data:InDoRES
Not a member yet
398 research outputs found
Sort by
The phylogeny and systematics of the Costellariidae (Caenogastropoda: Turbinelloidea) revisited
No full textReads bruts de l'article "The phylogeny and systematics of the Costellariidae (Caenogastropoda: Turbinelloidea) revisited" publié dans le journal Invertebrates Systematics
Replication data for Fig 5.10, Right side, WTPDs, Visual alarmers vs ward size
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: badger, WTPDs, visual alarmers, ward size, 21 Oct 2025
File name = Fig 5.10, Right side, WTPDs, Visual alarmers vs ward size. 21 Oct 2025
Number of visual alarmers in response to badger vs ward rank
for white-tailed prairie dogs
The number above each SEM line is the number of experiments
with the moving stuffed badger
Individual BTPDs were not marked, so I could accurately determine ward
ranks (relative ward sizes) but not exact ward sizes
Data in this EXCEL file are summaries. Raw data are in my field notes
from 1974 through 1976
Replication data for: Fig 6.4, Observed vs expected predations on peripheral adults and sexually active males during the mating season for UPDs, 03 Nov 2025.
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: Observed vs expected predations on peripheral adults and sexually active males, UPDs, 03 Nov 2025
Filename: Fig 6.4, Observed vs expected predations on peripheral adults and sexually active males during the mating season for UPDs, 03 Nov 2025.
The expected number for victims at the edge of colony resulted from the assumption that predation was equally likely for peripheral vs central adult residents.
The expected number for victimized sexually active males during the mating season resulted from the assumption that predation on adult males
was equally likely on all days of research (07 March 2005 through 08 July 2005).
I defined a territory as central if >50% of its boundary was contiguous with boundaries of other territories,
and as peripheral if <50% of its boundary abutted other territories.
Both P-values are from the Fisher exact test.
Of the 16 adult peripheral UPD victims shown in this figure, 14 were captured by the red fox and 2 were captured by northern goshawks.
Of the ten UPD sexually mature male victims, seven were captured by red foxes and three were captured by northern goshawks.
These data used for Fig 6.3 in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 03 Nov 2025.
Filename: Fig 6.4, Observed vs expected predations on peripheral adults and sexually active males during the mating season for UPDs, 03 Nov 2025
Dental Microwear Textures of Modern Pigs from the Geophagy Hypothesis Experimentation
No full textRead me - Dental Microwear Textures of Modern Pigs from the Geophagy Hypothesis Experimentation
Margot LOUAIL and Gildas MERCERON
This dataset contains dental microwear surfaces on crushing (f9, f10, f12, f13) and shearing (f1, f3, f4) facets on upper decidual premolars either right (dex) or left (sen) of controlled fed pigs at the GenESI Station at the Lusignan-Rouillé INRAe station, Nouvelle Aquitaine, France. Details are given in Louail et al. (2025).
Here are provided three different files for each specimen:
• Plu files: these files are the raw data extracted from the Leica DCM8 “Trident” stored at the PALEVOPRIM lab. Plµx files are also provided.
• Mnt files: these files include all pre-treatments ran on the Plu files. We batch-applied with a template on the Plu files. In a few cases, we adjusted the settings manually. All changes were saved in the mnt.
• Sur files: these files are the final studiables issued the mnt files. This is the data on which we can extract texture parameters.
A template is provided:
• Zinv200+ 100: this template is applied on the plux files obtained from dental molds, meaning the plux reproduces an inversed relief of the dental texture. A Z inverse operator is included in the template. 200 makes reference to the extraction of a 200x200 µm area and 100 to a 100x100 µm area on which analysis are run. PDF version of the template is provided so one could generate the very same procedures using open free software.
Each facet was scanned using “TRIDENT”, a Leica DCM8 (Leica Microsystem) white light confocal profilometer housed at the PALEVOPRIM lab (CNRS and University of Poitiers; numerical aperture: 0.90; working distance: 0.9 mm; Leica Microsystems). Scanned surfaces were pre-treated under LeicaMap v. 8.0 (Leica Microsystems, Mountain technology; see Merceron et al., 2016 including SI for more details). A 200 × 200 μm (1551 × 1551 pixels) leveled area was generated from each surface and used for Dental Microwear Texture Analysis.
Louail, M., Souron, A., Ferchaud, S., Merceron, G., 2025. Controlled and natural geophagy: how mineral particle consumption impacts dental microwear textures in pigs. Journal of Archeological Method and Theory
Merceron, G., Ramdarshan, A., Blondel, C., Boisserie, J. R., Brunetiere, N., Francisco, A., ... & Pret, D. (2016). Untangling the environmental from the dietary: dust does not matter. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 283(1838), 20161032.
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rspb.2016.103
Seine: Plan d'une partie de l'île Notre-Dame, carte de Duchanoy (1810)
No full textPlan d'une partie de l'île Notre-Dame, actuelle partie occidentale de l'île Saint-Louis.
Carte de Louis Duchanoy (1810).
Cette carte illustre un rapport rendu en 1810. Les parties lavées en bleu ont été construites en 1810 et les parties lavées en rouge sont en re-construction. Le plan est réalisé sans fioriture, lavé et figuré sommairement mais précisément. Il s'agit d'un document utile qui n'a pas la prétention d'avoir une visée esthétique.
Raster GeoTIFF : EAT_Seine_Notre_Dame_Duchanoy_1810.tiff
Service des Cartes et Plans des Archives Nationales. Cote AN F/14/10078/1/44.
Numérisation en 2014. Géoréférencement en 2014 par Julie DAVODET. Métadonnées par Julie DAVODET et Juliette AUDET. Mise en ligne en avril 2015.</p
Replication data for Fig 9.15 and 9.16, Upper right, GPDs, Kinships within home clan territory, 08 Dec 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: Kinships within home clan territory, GPDs, coefficient of genetic relatedness
File name = Fig 9.15 and 9.16, Upper right, GPDs, Kinships within home clan territory, 08 Dec 2025
OLD File Name = GPDs, PEFO kinships in 1995, 14 March 2023
Data checked TWO TIMES on 13 and 14 March 2023
X in Column-E (Kincheck) means that I checked entry for Kinship (Column-C)
No known kinship means no kinship, but I might not have been able to detect distant kinships
Shown here are kinships among GPD FEMALES ONLY--no data from yearling males
All kinships are based on maternal genetic relationships only--no information from paternities
For littermates, I assume FULL SIBSHIPS for all cases--i.e., I assume single paternity
when assigning maternal kinships--but I recognize that some of those cases were HALF SIBSHIPS
Half sisters are nonlittermate females of the same mother born in different years.
No known kinship = Kinship score = 13
These data are from Petrified Forest Colony only in May 1995. NO DATA from Redondo Meadow
Colony (RMC) or Visitor Center Colony (VCC)--both at Valles Caldera National Preserve (VCNP).
These GPD data used for Figures 9.15 and 9.16 in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 07 Feb 2025.
Petrified Forest National Park = PEFO, where I studied one colony only.
My last year of research at PEFO was 1995, when I had best information on kinships.
Note well: These kinships do NOT include data from sexually active males, which (almost)
always were from a different clan
once rem = once removed
When female GPDs had more than one common ancestor, I have depicted only the closer kinship in this EXCEL file.
For coefficients of relatedness (r) for kinships in this figure, see also Table 18.2, or Table 22.5 of Hoogland 2026.
For each species, data are shown for one year only. For GPDs, the year was May 1995.
r = coefficient of genetic relatedness
For GPD immigrants into the study-area, Kinship score = 13 and R-value X 100 = 0
File name = Fig 9.15 and 9.16, Upper right, GPDs, Kinships within home clan territory, 08 Dec 202
Replication data for: Fig 9.12, GPDs, adult female survivorship vs clan size, 05 Dec 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: GPDs, adult female survivorship, clan size
File name = Fig 9.12, GPDs, adult female survivorship vs clan size, 05 Dec 2025
OLD File name = GPDs, female survivorship vs clan size 06 Feb 2025
I cannot find the RAW DATA for these percentages.
These data are from GPD adult and yearling females that did or did not survive until next mating season
These percentages were checked TWO TIMES at creation of Figure 9.12
on 22 May 2022
Data for sample sizes are shown in Fig 9.12, as numbers above circles.
This file includes adult and yearling females that did and did not wean a litter.
This file includes adult (>=2 year old) and yearling females that did and did not wean a litter,
but this file does NOT include information from juvenile females
These data used for Figure 9.12 in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 06 Feb 2025.
Clan size = Number of adult and yearling GPDs living in same clan territory.
File name = Fig 9.12, GPDs, adult female survivorship vs clan size, 05 Dec 202
Replication data for Fig 9.15 and 9.16, Upper left, BTPDs, Kinships within home coterie territory, 08 Dec 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: Kinships within home coterie territory, BTPDs, coefficient of genetic relatedness
File name = Fig 9.15 and 9.16, Upper left, BTPDs, Kinships within home coterie territory, 08 Dec 2025
OLDFile name = BTPDs, Kinships in home coterie, 14 Nov 2022
Kinship = coefficient of genetic relatedness = r for all BTPD kinships in spring 1988
Note well: These kinships do NOT include data from sexually active males, which (almost)
always were from a different coterie
So, BTPD kinships are for (a) female-female, (b) female-yearling male who were both
born in the same coterie territory, and (c) yearling male-yearling male who were both born in the same coterie territory.
I have use this file to make identical copies of Figures 10.4a and 10.4b in Hoogland 1995 (page 216).
This file is IDENTICAL to SYSTAT file = kincots.sys, which I created on 19 Dec 1991
I used this file for Hoogland 1995, and assume that I checked it TWO TIMES UPON COMPLETION
For this figure, the number of dyads was 309, with individuals from 16 coteries.
These data used for Figures 9.15 and 9.16 in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 07 Feb 2025.
When two prairie dogs had more than one common ancestor, I have depicted only the closer kinship in this EXCEL file.
Data from Gunnison’s, Utah, and white-tailed prairie dogs are for females only, and include maternal kinships only.
Data from black-tailed prairie dogs include information from sexually immature yearling males
(who rarely disperse; see Chapter 22), and information from paternal kinships as well.
For coefficients of relatedness (r) for kinships in this figure, see also Table 18.2, or Table 22.5 of Hoogland 2026.
For each species, data are shown for one year only. For BTPDs, the year was April 1988.
r = coefficient of genetic relatedness
File name = Fig 9.15 and 9.16, Upper left, BTPDs, Kinships within home coterie territory, 08 Dec 202
Aisne: Cours de l'Aisne de Berneuil à Compiègne (1837)
No full textCette carte a pour but d'indiquer l'emplacement de projets d'écluse sur l'Aisne entre Soissons et Berneuil et Berneuil et Compiègne.
Une série de nouvelles écluses sont suggérées ainsi que l'assainissement du chemin de halage près de Crouy. Des écluses ont effectivement été réalisées près de Choisy au Bac, Rethondes, Fontenoy, et Vic-sur-Aisne. A Villeneuve-Saint-Germain, une écluse a bien été réalisée mais de l'autre côté de la rivière. Complété par un canal de dérivation, cet aménagement permet de raccourcir le temps de navigation. Le document est très simplement lavé.
La végétation n'est pas figurée et seuls les chemins principaux sont indiqués. Elle ne possède ni titre, ni bordure, ni signature.
Raster GeoTIFF : EAT_Aisne_Berneuil_Compiegne_1837.tif
Service des Cartes et Plans des Archives Nationales. Cote AN F/14/10049/1/12.
Numérisation en 2014. Géoréférencement en 2014 par Julie DAVODET. Métadonnées par Julie DAVODET et Juliette AUDET. Mise en ligne en avril 2015.</p
Aisne: Amélioration de la navigation de l'Aisne, carte de Marcilly (1837)
No full textCette carte est la pièce n°3 du projet de perfectionnement de l'Aisne. Contrairement à la carte F/14/10049/1/14 du même projet, la représentation est ici très soignée et le relief est juste.
Les couleurs conventionnelles adoptées sont différentes de la précédente carte du même projet : il ne s'agit pas du même dessinateur. Le plan de la rivière a été réalisé puis contrecollé sur une autre feuille de papier. Le plan de comparaison du nivellement général, la légende, le titre, l'échelle ont alors été ajoutés. Le projet a été ensuite validé par l'ingénieur en chef qui y a apposé sa signature.
Carte de Marcilly (1837).
Raster GeoTIFF : EAT_Aisne_Marcilly_1837.tif
Service des Cartes et Plans des Archives Nationales. Cote AN F/14/10049/1/20.
Numérisation en 2014. Géoréférencement en 2014 par Julie DAVODET. Métadonnées par Julie DAVODET et Juliette AUDET. Mise en ligne en avril 2015.</p