data:InDoRES
Not a member yet
398 research outputs found
Sort by
From Stream to Bloom: the dataset
No full textTwo spreadsheets comprising:
-Visitors of aquatic and wetland flowering plants
-Plant visits, pollen found in gut contents and pollen transfers performed by aquatic insect
Database of bat acoustic activity at onshore wind turbine nacelles
No full text# Presentation of the data
This database is the result of data collection and preparation over 5 projects conducted at CESCO (UMR7204 - MNHN) and funded between 2020 and 2025 by France Renouvelables, ADEME, the FRB and the CNRS. The aim of these projects was to train algorithms to predict the collision risk between onshore wind turbines and bats, using data from continuous acoustic monitoring at wind turbine nacelles carried out as part of French ICPE regulatory monitoring. The database compiles the results of the identification of recording files, which have all been processed in a homogeneous manner using the TADARIDA software developed by CESCO (UMR7204 - MNHN). These data consist of a sum of 5-second acoustic detections of bats for each time slot on each date for each site. There are four versions of the database, corresponding to different sizes of time slot in which the sum of detections was made: the whole night, per 10, 5 or 2.5% of the night elapsed. For each of these bat detection sums, the operation of the wind turbine, the weather conditions and other contextual information are documented, making it possible to model the factors influencing bat activity around wind turbines. This database contains a total of more than 130 sites across metropolitan France, totalling more than 29,000 nights of monitoring over 7 years between 2017 and 2023. It is being used to train algorithms to predict bat activity at specific times in the future, which will enable more effective management of wind turbine operation so as to minimise their ecological impact.
# Files
- P2_5_ER90_Final.csv: dataset with a temporal resolution by time slot of 2.5% of the night elapsed
- P5_ER90_Final.csv: dataset with a temporal resolution by time slot of 5% of the night elapsed
- P10_ER90_Final.csv: dataset with a temporal resolution by time slot of 10% of the night elapsed
- P100_ER90_Final.csv: dataset with a temporal resolution by complete nights.
- Definition_variables: presentation of the definition, class, unit, format, missing value presence and meaning, for each column of datasets.
# Related publication
Barré, K., Froidevaux, J. S. P., Sotillo, A., Roemer, C., & Kerbiriou, C. (2023). Drivers of bat activity at wind turbines advocate for mitigating bat exposure using multicriteria algorithm-based curtailment. Science of The Total Environment, 866, 161404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161404
# Contacts
Kévin Barré ([email protected])
Christian Kerbiriou ([email protected]
Multilocus genotypes from wild and farmed sporophytes of Saccharina latissima in Europe
No full textThis dataset was obtain while genotyping wild and farmed sporophytes of Saccharina latissima (sugar kelp) in Europe using microsatellite markers
Suivi peuplement poisson par UVC
No full textLa méthode UVC (Underwater Visual Census) est une méthode de comptage non destructrice permettant l’évaluation de la diversité et l’abondance de poissons. C’est une méthode largement utilisée par la communauté scientifique depuis les années 1970 sur l’ensemble des écosystèmes marins, particulièrement dans les aires marines protégées. Le suivi du peuplement de poisson est un suivi qui s'effectue tous les 3 ans dans la réserve naturelle de Cerbère Banyuls et ce depuis 2007
Oise: Entre Chauny et Compiègne (19ème siècle)
No full textCe plan de l'Oise entre Chauny et Compiègne figure le canal de Manicamps (1821), le canal de Saint Quentin (1721 et 1802) et le canal latéral à l'Oise (1822) à l'état de projet. Pourtant la carte semble avoir été dessinée au XIX siècle. De plus l'exactitude du projet fait douter du code couleur adopté.
Raster GeoTIFF : EAT_Oise_Chauny_Compiegne_180.tif
Service des Cartes et Plans des Archives Nationales. Cote AN F/14/10071/1/9.
Numérisation en 2014. Géoréférencement en 2014 par Aurélien Baro. Mise en ligne en avril 2015. Métadonnées par Julie DAVODET et Juliette AUDET.</p
Replication Data for: Fig 5.5, Left side, BTPDs, territorial calls vs ward size, 17 Oct 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: black-tailed prairie dog, territorial calls, ward size
File name = Fig 5.5, Left side, BTPDs, territorial calls vs ward size, 17 Oct 2025
Vocal conspicuousness during in July vs ward size for black-tailed prairie dogs (1975).
The number above each bar indicates the number of days of listening for 15-45 minutes at a ward.
I assumed that data from different days from the same ward were independent.
These data were collected in late July 1975, when juveniles had emerged from their natal nursery-burrows in May.
Estimated ward size includes adults, yearlings, and JUVENILES, and are the maximal counts I ever observed
I made only one count of territorial calls per day at each ward.
Ranks and sizes of colonies and wards for most of the other graphs for my book do NOT include juveniles.
Data for this figure come from summations of data in Tables 1 and 3 of Hoogland 1979 (superscript 1282),
for which I could not easily calculate standard errors.
BTPD = black-tailed prairie dog, WTPD = white-tailed prairie dog.
Note: Comparable data from WTPDs (Fig 5.5, right side) do NOT include juveniles
Data used in the article: "Intraspecific variation and phenotypic plasticity of olive varieties in response to contrasting environmental conditions"
No full textThis archive pertains to the data used in the following article:
"Intraspecific variation and phenotypic plasticity of olive varieties in response to contrasting environmental conditions".
It is composed of two files: (1) 2025_Wakibetal-Olive_AoBP_Readme.txt, which describes the content of the data file; (2) 2025_Wakibetal-Olive_AoBP_phenotypic_traits-data.txt, which contains the trait values averaged a the tree level for the two varietal collections in which the data were take
Données codes pour : Couleur et matérialité dans la peinture néo-impressionniste de P. Signac : l’influence des théories de la couleur sur sa création artistique - PhD Octobre 2025
No full textA methodology, adapted to large datasets, combining a spatial reduction step followed by an unsupervised partitioning step, is developed for the study of materials and color
Replication data for: Fig 7.1 and 7.2, Focal and scan samples summaries, GPDs, 04 Nov 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: Gunnison's prairie dog, vigilance, focal and scan samples
File name = Fig 7.1 and 7.2, Focal and scan samples summaries, GPDs, 04 Nov 2025
OLD File name = GPDs, Focal and scan summaries used in Hirschler, 15 May 2015
I received this file from Ian Hirschler sometime in fall 2021. I have not made any changes.
Mean of all scan samples= the overall average for vigilance per GPD from scan (Instantaneous) samples,
with ONE MEAN scan score for each GPD (N = 101 different GPDs)
Mean of all focal samples = the overall average for vigilance per GPD from focal samples,
with ONE MEAN focal score for each GPD (N = 60 different GPDs)
Ian Hirschler checked these data TWO TIMES for the following publication:
Hirschler, I. M., J. L. Gedert, J. Major, T. Townsend, J. L. Hoogland. 2016. What is the best way to estimate vigilance?
A comparison of two methods for Gunnison’s prairie dogs (Cynomys gunnisoni). Animal Behaviour 121: 117-122.
This file ready for longterm storage on 30 May 2025
In combination with data from Hoogland et al. 2013 (ref-1327), this file used for Figures 7.1 and 7.2
of Hoogland 2026. Citation for ref-1327 is the following:
Hoogland, J. L., S. L. Hale, A. D. Kirk, and Y. D. Sui. 2013. Individual variation in vigilance among
white-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys leucurus). Southwestern Naturalist 58:279-285.
File name = Fig 7.1 and 7.2, Focal and scan samples summaries, GPDs, 04 Nov 2025
More information for this file:
All data here are from the GPD Redondo Meadow Colony at Valles Caldera National Preserve in 2014
GPD Redondo Meadow Colony (RMC, studied in 2013 through 2016) was at Valles Caldera National Preserve (VCNP).
GPD Visitor Center Colony (VCC, studied in 2017 and 2018) was also at VCNP.
GPD colony at Petrified Forest National Park (PEFO) was studied from 1989 through 1995.
For statistical analyses of focal samples, I used data from a single overall percentage for the entire field season calculated from
single percentages of vigilance from focal samples per day per individual.
For statistical analyses of scan samples, I used a single mean estimate of vigilance per individual over the entire field season
calculated from single mean percentages of vigilance per day from all daily scan samples.
Ian Hirshcler created this file and checked all data TWO TIMES before publication of Hirschler et al. 2016.
GPD marker = Nyanzol dye marker. No information from eartags in this file.
Note, however, that all data are from a single year (2014).
These data used for Fig 7.1 and 7.2 in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 30 May 2025.
Notice that this file is now sorted BY INDIVIDUAL GPD. I did that sorting to get the "Single estimate per individual of
GPD vigilance from focal samples" = 18.6% + 10% (Mean + SD) depicted in Figure 7.1.
I also used sorting to get the "Single estimate per individual of GPD vigilance from scan samples
= 31.3% + 11.7%.
This file thus contains ALL RAW DATA for GPD focal samples and for GPD scan samples for Fig 7.1.
The raw data in this file for GPD focal samples comes from 60 different GPDs.
The raw data in this file for GPD scan samples comes from 101 different GPDs.
Citation for Hirschler et al. 2016.
Hirschler, I. M., J. L. Gedert, J. Major, T. Townsend, J. L. Hoogland. 2016. What is the best way to estimate vigilance? A comparison of two methods for Gunnison’s
prairie dogs (Cynomys gunnisoni). Animal Behaviour 121: 117-122.
File name = Fig 7.1 and 7.2, Focal and scan samples summaries, GPDs, 30 May 2025
Note that the data in this file are PROPORTIONS. To convert proportions to PERCENTAGES
for Figs 7.1 and 7.2, I multiplied proportions by 100
Aisne: Cours de l'Aisne de Soissons à Berneuil (1837)
No full textCette carte a pour but d'indiquer l'emplacement de projets d'écluse sur l'Aisne entre Soissons et Berneuil.
Une série de nouvelles écluses sont suggérées ainsi que l'assainissement du chemin de halage près de Crouy. Des écluses ont effectivement été réalisées près de Choisy au Bac, Rethondes, Fontenoy, et Vic-sur-Aisne.
A Villeneuve-Saint-Germain, une écluse a bien été réalisée mais de l'autre côt�� de la rivière.
Complété par un canal de dérivation, cet aménagement permet de raccourcir le temps de navigation.
Le document est très simplement lavé. La végétation n'est pas figurée et seuls les chemins principaux sont indiqués. Elle ne possède ni titre, ni bordure, ni signature.
Rasters GeoTIFF :
EAT_Aisne_Soissons_Berneuil_1837_1.tif
EAT_Aisne_Soissons_Berneuil_1837_2.tif
EAT_Aisne_Soissons_Berneuil_1837_3.tif
Service des Cartes et Plans des Archives Nationales. Cote AN F/14/10078/1/11.
Numérisation en 2014. Géoréférencement en 2014 par Julie DAVODET. Métadonnées par Julie DAVODET et Juliette AUDET.
Mise en ligne en avril 2015.</p