data:InDoRES
Not a member yet
398 research outputs found
Sort by
Replication data for: Fig 5.13, Upper left, Date of estrus by coterie, BTPDs, 24 Oct 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: black-tailed prairie dog, estrus date by coterie
Filename: Fig 5.13, Upper left, Date of estrus by coterie, BTPDs, 24 Oct 2025
OLD file name = synchron.sys, a SYSTAT file I created on 09 Nov 2016
These BTPD data are for 1986 only.
Dates shown here are Julian dates.
Julian date of copulation = 71 = 12 March, for example.
Julian date of parturition = 84 = March 25, for example.
These Julian data are for NON-LEAP years.
Julian dates for leap years after 28 February differ by 1 day.
This file contains data from only those coteries where >=2 females came into estrus
Excluded from this file are TWO coteries in which only one female came into estrus
This file checked TWO TIMES on 20 May 2025
These data used for Fig 5.13, Upper left graph, in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 19 May 2025.
Filename: Fig 5.13, Upper left, Date of estrus by coterie, BTPDs, 24 Oct 202
Parchment, ink and colouring materials analyses of the Mappa mundi of Albi
No full textThe Mappa mundi of Albi is one of the oldest examples of spatial representation of the Western world. The small map conserved on the verso of folio 57 in manuscript 29 of the Médiathèque Pierre Amalric in Albi (France) was drawn on parchment, probably made in the second half of the 8th century, somewhere between south-western France and northern Spain, maybe in Albi itself. Because of its exceptional importance for the history of space representation, the map, together with the Index of winds and seas facing it, on the recto of folio 58, was recorded in the UNESCO Memory of the World Register in 2015. The detailed study published here has examined the manuscript’s structure and characterised the different constitutive materials. Observations and physicochemical analyses were performed on the map and the index, from the micro to the macroscale, combining optical microscopy, XRF, FORS, FTIR, and micro-Raman spectroscopy, hyperspectral imaging, proteomic analysis, and non-linear optical microscopy. Three manuscripts conserved at the same library or suspected to have been produced in the scriptorium of Albi have also been examined for comparisons. This material investigation complements the historical studies of the map by shedding new light on the manufacturing, life, and conservation state of this exceptional document
Replication data for: Fig 8.13, Upper left, Number of alarm callers vs coterie size, BTPDs, 20 Nov 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: Number of alarm callers vs coterie size, BTPDs
File name: Fig 8.13, Upper left, Number of alarm callers vs coterie size, BTPDs, 20 Nov 2025
Old file name = Callers vs coterie size, 04 Nov 2025
This file has been checked ONE TIME by John and Judy. All corrections made.
Data for BTPDs in RED have been combined with data from another coterie.
Year = year of experiments
Coterie = name of coterie, based on resident adult male
Coterie size = number of BTPD adults and yearlings living in the same territory
For each coterie, I calculated a single mean number of alarm callers from all experimental
runs with moving stuffed badger.
The percentage of experiments with at least one alarm caller is obvious
Number of experiments = number of experimental runs with moving stuffed badger
Period (.) = missing data.
These data used for Fig 8.13 in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 03 June 2025.
I considered data from the same prairie dog in different years to be independent.
File name: Fig 8.13, Upper left, Number of alarm callers vs coterie size, BTPDs, 20 Nov 202
Coordonnées géographiques des sites atelier de la Zone atelier Environnementale Rurale Argonne
No full textCoordonnées géographiques au format WGS84 des sites ateliers de la ZARG (contours, emprise géographique et centroïde
Parcs éoliens terrestres équipés de SDA (Systèmes de Détection Automatique) en France
No full textCe jeu de données recense les parcs éoliens terrestres en France équipés de Systèmes de Détection Automatique (SDA). Ces systèmes permettent de détecter en temps réel la présence et la trajectoire d’oiseaux à proximité des éoliennes. En cas de trajectoire jugée à risque, le SDA envoie un ordre de ralentissement de l’éolienne afin de limiter les risques de collision.
Le jeu de données comprend des informations sur chaque parc, notamment :
- Identification et localisation : nom du parc, région, département, commune
- Caractéristiques technique : constructeur, exploitant, puissance installée et nombre de mâts
- Caractéristiques des SDA : présence d’un SDA et lorsque disponible, date de mise en service du SDA, modèle du SDA, nombre d’éoliennes équipées
Les données ont été principalement collectées auprès des DREAL (Directions Régionales de l’Environnement, de l’Aménagement et du Logement). Bien que ce recensement vise à être le plus complet possible, il n’est pas garanti d’être exhaustif.
Ce jeu de données constitue un outil de suivi du déploiement des parcs éoliens équipés de SDA en France
Replication data for: Fig 9.16, Lower left, UPDs, Estimates of r within home clan territory, 08 Dec 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: Kinships within home clan territory, UPDs, coefficient of genetic relatedness
File name = Fig 9.16, Lower left, UPDs, Estimates of r within home clan territory, 08 Dec 2025
Old File name = UPDs, estimates of r in home clan, 07 Feb 2025
Numbers shown here are in same order as numbers in Figure 9.16 for UPDs
103 (row 2)= no known kinships
0 (row 3) = 0.0156 =0
2 (row 4) = 0.313 > r <= 0.0156, etc.
I cannot find the RAW DATA for this figure, but this EXCEL file
shows all the raw data taken from original raw data sheets.
This EXCEL file checked TWO TIMES on 03 March 2000
These UPD data used for Figure 9.16 in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 07 Feb 2025.
No known kinship means no kinship, but I might not have been able to detect distant kinships
Shown here are kinships among UPD FEMALES ONLY--no data from yearling males
All r-values are based on maternal genetic relationships only--no information from paternities
For littermates, I assume FULL SIBSHIPS for all cases--i.e., I assume single paternity
when assigning maternal kinships--but I recognize that some of those cases were HALF SIBSHIPS
Half sisters are nonlittermate females of the same mother born in different years.
These data are from UPD Horse Corral Colony at Bryce Canyon National Park in May 2000 only.
No data on UPD kinships from other years.
This file ready for longterm storage on 07 Feb 2025.
Note well: These kinships do NOT include data from sexually active males, which (almost)
always were from a different clan
once rem = once removed
When female UPD had more than one common ancestor, I have depicted only the closer kinship in this EXCEL file.
For coefficients of relatedness (r) for kinships in this figure, see also Table 18.2, or Table 22.5 of Hoogland 2026.
For each species, data are shown for one year only. For UPDs, the year was May 2000.
File name = Fig 9.16, Lower left, UPDs, Estimates of r within home clan territory, 08 Dec 2025
UPD Horse Corral Colony had 29 clans in 2000.
r = coefficient of genetic relatednes
Pollen and ovule production data of ancestral and descendant populations of Viola arvensis in four location of the Parisian region
No full textThis dataset has been obtained while phenotyping ancestral and descendant populations of four locations of the field pansy (Viola arvensis). Ancestral populations were collected in the field in 90's-2000's and conserved in seedbanks and descendant were collected in the field in 2021. A first generation was grown in common garden in 2021. Using mothers from the first generation, a second generation composed of families of 5 siblings was grown in controlled greenhouses in 2022. We measured pollen and ovule productions in this second generation. Measurements were made following the methods described in this article: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaf203
Seine: Le secteur de Choisy, carte de Navier (1810)
No full textCe plan et ce profil sont destinés à « faire connaître la forme du terrain dans l'emplacement de la gare », en vue de la construction d'un pont, qui sera effectivement réalisé.
L'emplacement est dessiné en plan et de profil. Il est intéressant de souligner ici que le célèbre ingénieur Navier choisit comme point de référence un zéro à 15 mètres au dessus de l'étiage. Cette technique, utilisée dans un premier temps pour les relevés hydrographique a été surtout été théorisée par les militaires. Deux dates sont indiquées sur la carte 1810 et 1801. La commission topographique qui s'est tenue en 1802 préconise le choix du zero au niveau général de la mer. On pourrait donc penser que c'est l'ingénieur Navier qui s'est trompé de date... Seulement Navier n'a accédé au grade d'ingénieur qu'en 1806. Il s'agit donc d'une erreur de l'ingénieur en chef.
La carte est bien de 1810, Navier choisit donc de ne pas respecter les préconisations de la commission de topographie, sans doute à cause de la nature de l'ouvrage construit.
Raster GeoTIFF : GOT_Seine_Navier_1810.tif
Service des Cartes et Plans des Archives Nationales. Cote AN F/14/10078/1/31.
Numérisation en 2014. Géoréférencement en 2014 par Julie DAVODET. Mise en ligne en avril 2015. Métadonnées par Julie DAVODET et Juliette AUDET.</p
Replication data for: Fig 9.3, Top, Territory sizes, BTPDs, 03 Dec 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: black-tails, territory size, burrows per territory
File name: Fig 9.3, Top, Territory sizes, BTPDs, 03 Dec 2025
OLD File name = Fig 9.3, BTPDs, Territory sizes, 04 Feb 2024
Date = 26 April 2020
I created this file today from SYSTAT file = terrsize, which I created on 08 Oct 2020
I used this file for Hoogland 1995, and I assume that all data were checked TWO TIMES at creation
Coterie size = number of adults and yearlings in home coterie territory
Territory size is in hectares
Burrow entrances in coterie territory = number of burrow entrances in home territory
These data used for Figure 9.3 in Hoogland 2026.
This file ready for longterm storage on 04 Feb 2025.
File name: Fig 9.3, Top, Territory sizes, BTPDs, 03 Dec 202
Fig 5.12, Right side, BTPDs, Estimate of female ARS vs reprod synchrony, 22 Oct 2025
No full textFILE DESCRIPTION
Keywords: BTPDs, female ARS vs reproductive synchrony, litter size, yearlings
File name = Fig 5.12, Right side, BTPDs, Estimate of female annual reproductive
success (ARS) vs reprod synchrony when litter size >=1, 22 Oct 2025
This table shows ARS of BTPD females vs reproductive synchrony of
copulations within single BTPD ward (my Rankin Ridge study-colony).
1st third = copulations in first third of mating season = early copulations
2nd third = copulations in second third of mating season = synchronous copulations
3rd third = copulations in third third of mating season = late copulations
The number above each SEM line indicates the number of females for which I have data.
BTPD = black-tailed prairie dog
This file contains data from all four species.
Early copulations occurred in the first third of the mating season;
synchronous copulations in the middle third; and late copulations in the final third.
SEM = standard error of mean
This file shows data from BTPDs only; other graph in Fig 5.12 (left side)
shows data from all four prairie dog species
Litter size = litter size at first juvenile emergence = weanlings
Yearlings = number of weanlings that survived for >9 months after weanin