Ehime University Institutional Repository

朝井, 志歩

Japanese

岩国基地への空母艦載機移駐問題をめぐる地域社会の変容 ─米軍基地がもたらす被害とは何か─

Christopher Connelly,

English

An Investigation of the Use of Western Music and Song Lyrics in the L2 Classroom

渡邉, 敬逸

四国地方における無住化集落の分布と空間的特徴

寺内, 浩

弘法大師空海と満濃池修築

中曽, 久雄

66 2019  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 O n   C a r p e n t e r  v.  U n i t e d  S t a t e s  
 
H i sa o  NA KA S O  
 
9 2  
 
 
5 4 FBI
4
4
 
4 
The right of  the people to be  
secure in their persons, houses, papers,  
and effects, against unreasonable 
searches and seizures,  shall  not be  
violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but 
upon probable cause,  supported by Oath 
or affirmation,  and particularly  
describing the place to be searched, and 
the persons or things to be seized
4
4
4
~
 
 
   
4  
1 2 7  
4
4
1 2 8
Olmstead v.  United States 1 2 9
4
 
Katz v.  United States 1 3 0
Olmstead
1 3 1
4
4
4
                                                         
1 2 7  Christopher 
Slobogin,  Making the Most  o f United States 
v.  Jones  in a.  Surveil lance Society:  
A Statutory Implementat ion  o f Mosaic  
Theory,  8  DU KE  J.  CON S T. L.  &.  PU B.  POL'Y 1,  
3-4 (2012).  
1 2 8  Akhil Reed Amar,  Fourth Amendment 
First Principles ,  107 HARV.  L.  REV.  757, 786 
(1994).  
1 2 9  277 U.S. 438 (1928) .  
1 3 0  89 U.S. 347 (1967) .  
1 3 1  389 U.S. 347 (1967) .  
Katz 4
4
4 1 3 2
Katz
Katz
1 3 3 Katz
4
1 3 4  
Katz
4 1 3 5  
Miller v. United States
Miller
Katz
Katz
                                                         
1 3 2  RICHARD M. THOMPSON  II,  
CON G.  RES EARCH SERV. ,  R43586, THE FOURTH 
AM EN DM EN T THIRD-PARTY DOCTRIN E,  6 (2014) .  
1 3 3  Id.   
1 3 4  Slobogin,  supra note 127, at  5 -7.  
1 3 5  Orin S. Kerr,  The  Case for the  
Third-Party Doctrine,  107 MICH.  L.  REV.  561, 
563 (2009).  
66 2019  
 
4
 
Miller
1 3 6  
Smith v.  Maryland 1 3 7
pen  
register
Smith Katz
Smith
Smith
                                                         
1 3 6  Eric Johnson,  Lost  in the  c loud:  Cloud 
storage , privacy, 
and suggest ions  for protect ing users 'data.  
69 STAN. L.  REV. 867,  883 (2017).  
1 3 7  442 U.S. 735 (1979) .  
Smith
 
1 3 8 California v.  
Greenwood 1 3 9
United 
States v.  Knotts1 4 0
 
 
 
1 4 1  
                                                         
1 3 8  
Nathanie l Wackman, Historical Cellular 
Locat ion Information & the Fourth 
Amendment , 2015 U.  ILL.  L.  REV. 263, 302 
(2015).  
1 3 9  486 U.S. 35,  37 (1988).  
1 4 0  460 U.S. 276 (1983) .  
1 4 1  THOMPSON II,  supra note 132, at 16.  
~
 
 
   
1 4 2
1 4 3
1
1 4 4  
                                                         
1 4 2  Kerr,  supra note 135, 576.  
1 4 3  Orin Kerr,  The Fourth Amendment and 
New Technologies:  Const itut ional Myths and 
the Case  for Caut ion , 102 MICH. L. REV.  801, 
859 (2004).  
1 4 4  Eugene Volokh, Freedom of  Speech and 
Information Privacy: The Troubling 
Implicat ions o f  a  Right to Stop People from 
Speaking About You, 52 STAN.  L. REV.  1049, 
1053 (2000).  
Miller
1 4 5
1 4 6
Mille Brennan
1 4 7
                                                         
1 4 5  Kenneth L. Karst,  “The Files”:  Legal  
Contro ls Over the Accuracy and Accessibi l ity 
of Stored Personal Data, 31 LAW & CON TEM P. 
PROBS.  342,  344 (1966).  
1 4 6  Susan W. Brenner & Leo L.  Clarke , 
Fourth Amendment for Shared Privacy 
Rights in Stored Transact ional  Dat a, 14 J.L. 
& POL’Y  211, 258 (2006) .  
1 4 7  THOMPSON II,  supra note 132, at 18-19.  
66 2019  
 
1 4 8  
4
 
1 4 9
1 5 0 GPS
United States v.  Jones 1 5 1
GPS 4
Sotomayor
GPS
Sotomayor
GPS
                                                         
1 4 8  Catherine Hancock, Warrants for Wearing  
a Wire: Fourth Amendment Privacy and 
Just ice  Harlan’s  Dissent in United States v.  
White,  79 MIS S.  L.  J.  35 (2009) .  
1 4 9  P. Kramer Rice,  You Are Here:  Tracking 
Around the Fourth Amendment  to Protect 
Smartphone Geolocat ion Information with 
the GPS Act ,  38 SETON HALL LEGIS .  J .  17, 
23-24 (2013) .  
1 5 0  Orin S. Kerr,  A User ’s Guide to the  Stored 
Communicat ions Act ,  and a Legislator ’s  
Guide to Amending It ,  72 GEO.  WAS H. L.  REV. 
1208, 1219 (2004).  
1 5 1  132 S. Ct.  945 (2012) .  
1 5 2
Sotomayor
4
1 5 3  
6
6
 
1 5 4
7
67
United States v.  
Davis 1 5 5
                                                         
1 5 2  Id.  at  954-57 (Sotomayor,  J. ,  concurring).  
1 5 3  Id.  at  957.  
1 5 4  Carpenter,  819 F.3d at 884-889.  
1 5 5  785 F.3d 498 (11th Cir.  2015).  
~
 
 
   
1 5 6
Stored Communications Act
In re 
Electronic Communication Service to  
Disclose1 5 7 3
4
3
3
Stored  
Communications Act §  
2307(d)
§ 2307(d)
specific and  
articulable facts
only if
1 5 8
1 5 9  
1 6 0
 
                                                         
1 5 6  Id.  at  511.  
1 5 7  620 F.3d 304 (3d Cir.  2010).  
1 5 8  Id.  at  315.  
1 5 9  Id.  at  319.  
1 6 0  David Oscar Markus & Nathan Freed 
Wessler,  That ’70s  Show: Why the 11th 
Circuit Was Wrong to Rely on Cases from the 
1970s to Decide  a Cell -Phone Tracking Case ,  
70 U. MIAM I  L.  REV. 1179, 1204 (2016).  
1 6 1
4
1 6 2  
1 6 3
1 6 4
                                                         
1 6 1  Susan Freiwald,  Cell Phone Locat io n 
Data and the  Fourth Amendment : A Quest ion 
of Law, Not Fact ,  70 MD.  L.  REV.  681, 744 
(2011) .  
1 6 2  Stephanie Lockwood,  Who Knows Where 
You’ve  Been?: Privacy Concerns Regarding 
the Use o f Cellular Phones as Personal 
Locators,  18 HARV. J.L.  & TECH. 307, 316 
(2004).  
1 6 3  Robert Harrington,  Note ,  Avoiding Scylla 
and Charybdis:  Why the  Third Party Doctrine  
Is Il l  Suited to  Treat CSLI, and What the 
State Courts Can Do About  It ,  4  VA.  J.  CRIM. 
L. 361,  382 (2016) .  
1 6 4  Id.  at  384.  
66 2019  
 
 
 
1 6 5  
4
1 6 6  
FBI
 
Roberts 4
4
                                                         
1 6 5  Stephanie K.  Pell & Christopher 
Soghoian,  Can You See  Me Now?:  Toward 
Reasonable Standards for Law Enforcement 
Access to  Locat ion Data That Congress Could 
Enact,  27 BERKELEY  TECH.  L.J.  117, 127 
(2012).  
1 6 6  Susan Freiwald,  Light in the Darkness:  
How the LEATPR Standards Guide 
Legis lators in Regulat ing Law Enforcement 
Access to Cell Site Locat ion Records , 66 OKLA.  
L. REV.  875, 885-86 (2014).  
United States v.  Knotts Smith v.  
Maryland  
4
Jones
GPS
GPS
Smith Miller
4
Carpenter
4
 
~
 
 
   
privacies 
of  li fe GPS
Knotts
Jones
 
4
Kennedy
Kennedy
Carpenter
 
Thomas Katz
Katz
4
4
Katz
Carpenter
Thomas
Carpenter
4
Sprint MetroPCS
Carpenter
4
 
Alito
Alito
4
Alito
Alito
Alito
66 2019  
 
Alito
Carpenter
Carpenter
 
Gorsuch
Gorsuch Thomas
Katz
Gorsuch Katz
 Gorsuch Katz
Gorsuch 4
Gorsuch
Carpenter Katz
 
Kennedy
 
1 6 7
1 6 8  
Jones
Sotomayor
1 6 9 Sotomayor GPS
Sotomayor
                                                         
1 6 7  Lance H. Selva et  al. ,  Rise o f  the Mosaic 
Theory: Implicat ions for  Cell Site  Locat ion 
Tracking by Law Enforcement,  32 J.  
MARS HALL J.  IN FO. TECH. & PRIVACY L.  235 
(2016) ;  Aaron Stevenson,  A Fourth 
Amendment  Framework for the Future : 
Applying the Mosaic  Theory to  Digital  
Communicat ions,  77 OHIO ST. L.J.  
Furthemore 145 (2016) .   
1 6 8  Orin S. Kerr,  The  Mosaic Theory o f the  
Fourth Amendment ,  111 MICH.  L. REV.  311, 
320 (2012).  Kerr
 
1 6 9  Christ ian Bennardo,  The Fourth 
Amendment , CSLI Tracking, and the Mosaic  
Theory, 85 FORDHAM L. REV.  2385,  2408 
(2017).   
~
 
 
   
1 7 0 Jones
 
Katz
Katz
Gorsuch Thomas
Katz
1 7 1 Katz 4
1 7 2
1 7 3
Katz
1 7 4
                                                         
1 7 0  Id.  at  2408-09.  
1 7 1  Id.  at  2411.  
1 7 2  Id.  at  2411-12.  
1 7 3  Id.  at  2412.  
1 7 4  Id.  
1 7 5
1 7 6  
1 7 7
1 7 8
1 7 9
1 8 0
1 8 1
                                                         
1 7 5  Id.  at  2412-13.  
1 7 6  Id.  at  2413.  
1 7 7  Id.  at  2414.  
1 7 8  Id.  
1 7 9  Id.  at  2414-15.  
1 8 0  Id.  at  2415.  
1 8 1  Id.  at  2416.  
66 2019  
 
 
1 8 2
1 8 3
 
 
                                                         
1 8 2  4
Ric  Simmons, The Missed Opportunit ies of  
Riley v.  California,  12 OHIO ST. J .  CRIM.  L.  
253, 253 (2014).  
1 8 3  Aaron Stevenson, A Growing Consensus: 
A Comment  on United States v .  Carpenter,  
and the  U.S. Supreme Court 's 
Opportunity  to  Protect  Privacy, 78 OHIO ST.  
L.J.  FU RTHERM ORE 13, 28 (2017).   
~



携帯電話の位置情報とプライバシー 2

金, 玄勲

魁生, 由美子

66 91-100 2019 
What is learned in the field related to Care? 
From the angle of Social welfare and Education  
 
Hyun Hoon KIM and Yumiko KAISHO 
 
( 9 2 ) 
 
 
 
(Ethics of care) (relationships) (volunteer) 
 
 
2018 9
65
28.1% 1
2018 0.98
5
2019 3
 2017 2067 2016
2023
2019
2  
3
愛媛大学教育学部紀要　第66巻　91~100　2019
 
 
 
1997
4
( 1)
 
1 (
: 2019 3 21 ) 
 
1980 1
5  
66 91-100 2019 
20
6  
30
1997
10 2006
(2006 9 26 )
 
 
( ) 
 
( ) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
( ) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
( ) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
愛媛大学教育学部紀要　第66巻　91~100　2019
 
( )
7  
8  
9  
 
2
5 6
10  
11
66 91-100 2019 
 
(personal social services)
 
 
 
 
Kids' Asian Union( Kids’ AU )  
2000 12
2004 Kids’ AU
1 1
( 2)  
 
20
 
愛媛大学教育学部紀要　第66巻　91~100　2019
 
2 Kids’ AU (
: 2017
8 13 ) 
 
 
12
Kids’ AU
 
( ) 
 
2018 12 30
0.6 57.9%
53.3%
13 18
1992 205 2018 118
 
I.
 
 
(schooled)
14  
 
 
15
Moodle
66 91-100 2019 
 
 
9 10
7
 
 
16
(gift)
 
1979( 54)
 
17
愛媛大学教育学部紀要　第66巻　91~100　2019
 
18
 
19
20  
 
21
 
 
 
22  
 
(incubator)
OG
 
 
23
66 91-100 2019 
 
24
( 3)
 
 
25  
 
 
 
3 (
2019 3 21 : 
) 
 
30
 
 
 
( ) 
 
 
 
愛媛大学教育学部紀要　第66巻　91~100　2019
 
                                                   
1 
https://www.stat.go.jp/data/topics/topi1130.htm
l (2019 8 30 ) 
2 HP 
http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/1/1/inde
x.board?bmode=read&aSeq=373873 (2019 8
30 ) 
3 ( 64 )
2016 p.3.( ) 
4 
(15) 2015 pp.88-90. 
5 
( 2019
)
 
6 
(22) 2018 pp.76-78. 
7 
2004
( 67 )
2017 p.3. 
8 ( )
1987
2014 pp.1-21. 
9 21 (2017 5 15 )
(
) 
10 (2018 4 16 )  
 
( ) 
11 (
59 ) 2014 p.3.( ) 
12 HP 
http://world-ch.com/?pgCode=0207 (2019 8
30 ) 
13 HP 
http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/toukei/chousa01
/kihon/kekka/k_detail/1407849.htm (2019 8
30 ) 
14 ( )
1977 p.13. 
15 
2003   
                                                                                 
16 
NPO
(2001 )
(
2018 5 11
)
(2019 3 26
) 
17 p.32. 
18 
2019
pp.12-13. 
19 (
)
2014 p.19. 
20 p.87. 
21 HP 
http://www.bunka.go.jp/pr/publish/bunkachou_
geppou/2012_03/series_08/series_08.html (2019
8 30 ) 
22 p.84. 
23 
(
( )
2010 p.294.) 
p.81. 
24 (http://sinsa9988.or.kr/ )
3,100 9 2,900
220
46 2
3,500
1
(2019 3 29
) 
25 
47 2017
pp.125-136. 


ケアの現場で何を学ぶか? : 社会福祉と教育の視点から

遠藤, 健嗣

板橋, 衛

柑橘地域における農作業事故の特徴と対策の現状 -JA にしうわ管内の農作業事故を事例として-

小嶋, 博巳

六十六部巡礼地再考 : 八十八カ所の成立とも関わらせて

野並, 浩

細胞膨圧計測に伴うソフトイオン化細胞分子計測の開発

NAKASO, Hisao

判例研究 性同一性障害特例法3 条1 項4 号の合憲性(最決平成31 年1 月23 日)

Not a member yet