Jurnal STAI Al-Hamidiyah
Not a member yet
    83485 research outputs found

    Health in police custody in Australia: a scoping review

    No full text
    Project completed and published Dec 30, 2025. Original description: Unlike individuals in prisons, little information on the health of people in police custody is released in Australia. Of the limited information available, both academic and grey literature have raised repeated concerns about the health and wellbeing of individuals in this setting. An initial step towards identifying the main knowledge gaps in this area is extensively searching, identifying and describing what information is available. The objective of this scoping review is to identify and describe the available information on the determinants of health, and health outcomes of individuals in police custody in Australia

    Young at Heart: Exploring the Relationship Between Subjective Age and Prescriptive Stereotype Violation

    No full text
    This project explores potential factors that might impact younger perceivers’ attitudes towards older adults who feel young at heart. We examine the possible association between endorsement of prescriptive age stereotypes and reactions to older adults whose subjective age is younger than their chronological age. While a growing body of research suggests that a younger subjective age is predictive of greater well-being in older adulthood (for a review see Alonso Debreczeni & Bailey, 2021), more work is needed to understand whether and how backlash might occur towards older people who feel ‘younger than their years.’ The findings from this project may be informative for future anti-ageism interventions

    Baylor Religion Survey, Wave VI (2021)

    No full text

    Storying our future: exploring psychological patterns across Black and white Americans' narratives about the future of the U.S. and world

    No full text
    This mixed-methods study explores psychological patterns in the way middle-aged Black (n=58) and white (n=76) Americans imagine the future of the U.S. and world. In particular, we draw upon a set of interviews and self-report data (N=135), conducted in the wake of the 2016 U.S. election, as part of which participants were asked, “what do you think our country and the world will be like 14 years from now, in approximately 2030?” Four psychological dimensions were identified across participants’ future narratives: hope, fear, faith in humanity and sensemaking. A working coding manual was developed, and narratives were coded to capture individual differences in levels of psychological themes. This analysis explores the following possibilities: first, that racial context impacts the extent to which individuals express psychological themes of hope, fear, faith in humanity and sensemaking in narratives about the future of the U.S. and world. And second, that racial context also impacts the extent to which these psychological themes relate to important mental health outcomes of psychological well-being, depression and generativity. This quantitative analysis will lay the groundwork for a deeper qualitative investigation of the ways in which racial experience may shape how Black and white individuals envision the future of society

    The Influence of Deepfakes in the US election campaign - A panel study

    No full text
    In this study, the relationship between the perceived use of deepfakes by political parties and their supporters in the US election campaign will be examined using various psychological, political and socio-demographic variables. During the last election campaign in 2020, social media was observed to have an impact on citizens (Guess e al., 2023). We therefore assume that social media will also play a major role in the upcoming election campaign, in which deepfakes are appearing more and more frequently. The basic aim is to investigate how the influence of deepfakes on democratic processes is perceived. There is already some research that deals with the effects of deepfakes on democratic processes. For example, they lead to lower trust in institutions, distortion of democratic discussions and lower legitimacy of political decisions (Pawelec, 2022; Chesney & Citron, 2019). Thus, there is already evidence that deepfakes influence democratic processes. We would like to combine these approaches with socio-psychological approaches to threat research and refer to the Intergroup Threat Theory (Stephan, Ybarra & Morrison, 2009), which distinguishes between symbolic and realistic threat, among other things. We assume that deepfakes have an impact on the perception of a symbolic threat to democratic values and discussion culture, and that a fundamental willingness of people to engage in political discussions influences this perception, as they scrutinize media content more carefully (Scheufele et al. 2002). On the other hand, we assume that they have an effect on the perception of realistic threats of potential abuse by political opponents, whereby we consider party affiliation and proximity to the party to be decisive influencing factors. We will collect data at four data points in time, three of them being before the election and one after the election

    Scientist Stereotypes: Examining the Role of Race and Gender

    No full text
    The primary goal of this experiment is to examine how traits stereotypically associated with Black men, Black women, White men, and White women overlaps with scientist traits. Black participants will be assigned to one of six social groups (scientists, nurses, White men, White women, Black men, or Black women) and will be told to select 6 positive and 6 negative traits that best describes how their assigned social group is viewed in society. We will then explore how these selected traits overlap with scientist traits

    224

    full texts

    83,485

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    Jurnal STAI Al-Hamidiyah
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇