Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sriwijaya: Open Journal Systems
Not a member yet
807 research outputs found
Sort by
ASAS ITIKAD BAIK DALAM MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING: TINJAUAN TERHADAP HUKUM PERJANJIAN DI INDONESIA
This research aims to provide in-depth insight into the role of the principle of good faith in Memorandums of Understanding (MoU) in Indonesia and how this principle supports fair and sustainable relations between the parties. The principle of good faith is the legal principle that underlies the formation, implementation and cancellation of agreements, including MoUs. In the context of the MoU, the principle of good faith provides an ethical and legal basis that must be adhered to by the parties involved. This research explains how the principle of good faith influences the process of forming an MoU by emphasizing the importance of transparency, good intentions and mutual understanding between the parties. Apart from that, the principle of good faith also plays an important role in ensuring parties comply with their commitments in accordance with the objectives of the agreement. Within the framework of contract law in Indonesia, this study explains the relevance of the principle of good faith to applicable regulations. Thus, this journal provides an understanding of contract law in Indonesia and the principles underlying it
Third-Party Litigation Funding: Legal Feasibility and Insights from Australia, the UK, and the US for Expanding Access to Justice in Indonesia
Access to justice is often hindered by financial constraints, preventing plaintiffs from pursuing legal claims. Third-Party Litigation Funding (TPLF) offers a potential solution by allowing external funders to finance litigation in exchange for a share of any awarded damages or settlement. By covering litigation costs, TPLF enables financially disadvantaged plaintiffs to seek legal redress, making it a crucial mechanism for expanding access to justice. However, unregulated TPLF poses risks, including the encouragement of frivolous claims, ethical concerns, and profit-driven motivations that may override legal merit. Indonesia currently lacks specific regulations governing TPLF, raising questions about its legal permissibility and practical implementation. This study examines TPLF frameworks in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States to derive insights that may inform the development of TPLF practices in Indonesia. Utilizing a normative legal research methodology based on secondary data, the study explores the opportunities and challenges of introducing TPLF into the Indonesian legal system. The findings indicate that while TPLF can be legally accepted in Indonesia, its application should be restricted to cases with broad public interest, such as environmental and consumer litigation. Furthermore, Indonesia’s ongoing efforts to enhance access to justice and the absence of explicit legal prohibitions present opportunities for the regulated adoption of TPLF. This research contributes to the discourse on litigation funding by providing recommendations for policymakers, legal practitioners, and stakeholders in shaping a fair and regulated TPLF framework in Indonesia
Enhancing Consumer Protection in Electronic Transactions in Indonesia
Technological advancements have significantly facilitated electronic transactions, making business interactions faster and more convenient. However, these developments also introduce risks, especially for consumers, as electronic transactions can lead to significant financial losses if not handled carefully. This study proposes effective legal protections for consumers to prevent such losses and ensure proper compensation in electronic business transactions. This research employs a normative legal methodology, utilizing both a statutory and conceptual approach. The statutory approach analyses laws and regulations governing electronic transactions, while the conceptual approach applies Richard Posner's Economic Analysis of Law theory to assess the efficiency of consumer protection mechanisms. Data was gathered through a literature review of primary and secondary legal sources, and conclusions were drawn using deductive reasoning. The Economic Analysis of Law theory was the major premise, with relevant laws and regulations forming the minor premise. The findings reveal two main conclusions. First, while existing laws such as the Consumer Protection Law, the ITE Law, PP PMSE, PP PSTE, and Regulation of the Minister of Trade Number 31 of 2023 provide basic consumer protection by sanctioning businesses that offer mismatched products, reclaiming consumer rights is not straightforward. Second, to mitigate potential losses in electronic transactions, a validation process for business actors is necessary before they offer products, and Electronic System Trading Providers (PPMSE) must establish an efficient mechanism for compensating consumer losses. This study highlights the need for a more robust and accessible framework to protect consumers in electronic business transactions, ensuring that legal recourse is both efficient and effective
Legal Analysis of the Use of Personal Identity as Guarantee in Online Loans
In the developing digital era, the practice of online lending has become a new thing among the public due to its ease and quick access. The use of ID cards as collateral in online lending has become an interesting topic in the legal context. This research aims to analyze whether ID cards can be categorized as documents that can be used as collateral. The research method used is a normative analysis of laws and regulations and other rules that can be used as a legal basis. Because basically ktp is a population document that functions as a means of identifying a person, not as proof of property ownership. However, in practice, personal identity/KTP is sometimes used as one of the requirements for obtaining online loans. This is done to verify the borrower's identity and minimize the risk of fraud. The analysis highlights various legal issues related to the use of ID as collateral in online lending, including aspects of consumer protection, contract validity, and legal liability in cases of identity misuse. This research provides a deep insight into the legal framework governing this practice as well as the challenges faced in law enforcement and consumer protection in the digital age
Pemanfaatan Wilayah Yang Tidak Sesuai Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Atas Rencana Pembangunan Pabrik Tapioka
The spatial planning of the North Lampung district is about to undergo an overhaul due to the planned construction of a tapioca factory by PT Sinar Baru Rusa Prima in the Abung Kunang area, which is not an industrial area in accordance with the established Regional Spatial Plan. This became a polemic because the North Lampung Regency legislature had submitted a recommendation letter to stop the construction of the tapioca factory because it was not in accordance with the RTRW. However, this is constrained because the North Lampung Regency Government has obtained a Space Utilization Conformity Permit so that the tapioca factory construction plan will continue by amending the North Lampung Regional Regulation Number 4 of 2014 concerning the North Lampung Regency Spatial Plan 2014-2034 which previously had five industrial areas to thirteen industrial areas.This research uses a normative method using literature study. The purpose of this research is to analyze the impact of the plan to build a tapioca factory by PT Sinar Baru Rusa Prima in the Abung Kunang area, North Lampung Regency, on the established regional spatial planning. This research aims to identify the discrepancies between the factory development plan and the applicable Regional Spatial Plan, and evaluate the implications of these changes for regional development
Mengkaji Kembali Pengaturan Kewajiban Kerja Sama Internasional Negara Anggota Statuta Roma 1998 Dalam Melaksanakan Surat Perintah Penangkapan
Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi ketentuan mengenai kerja sama internasional dalam Statuta Roma 1998, khususnya terkait pelaksanaan surat perintah penangkapan oleh negara-negara anggota. Artikel ini membahas dua permasalahan utama, yaitu kelemahan dalam Bagian 9 Statuta Roma 1998 mengenai kerja sama internasional dan bantuan hukum, khususnya dalam pelaksanaan surat perintah penangkapan; dan bagaimana seharusnya ketentuan tersebut dioptimalkan agar pelaksanaan surat perintah penangkapan dapat dilaksanakan secara efektif. Dalam rangka menjawab kedua permasalahan tersebut, penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, yaitu Statuta Roma 1998; dan pendekatan kasus, yaitu kasus Omar Al-Bashir dan Vladimir Putin. Penelitian ini juga menggunakan teknik penalaran retorika dengan cara memberikan argumentasi-argumentasi yang meyakinkan dalam menjawab permasalahan tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kelemahan struktural dan politis dalam pengaturan kerja sama internasional telah mengurangi efektifitas surat perintah penangkapan. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini mengusulkan tiga strategi penguatan: yaitu memperluas yurisdiksi OTP melalui prinsip yurisdiksi universal, memperkuat peran Assembly of States Parties (ASP), serta mengoptimalkan keterlibatan Dewan Keamanan Perserikan Bangsa-Bangsa (DK PBB). Penelitian ini juga merekomendasikan bahwa penting bagi International Criminal Court (ICC) untuk melakukan pembaharuan hukum terhadap ketentuan kerja sama internasional dalam Bagian 9 Statuta Roma 1998, baik melalui amandemen, pedoman pelaksanaan yang lebih jelas, maupun bentuk pengaturan lain yang mengikat, guna meningkatkan efektivitas surat perintah penangkapan dan memperkuat komitmen negara anggota
Prinsip Fair Use Dalam Gubahan Lagu Di Era Digital Bedasarkan Perlindungan Hak Cipta di Indonesia
Indonesia salah satu negara yang menghargai karya cipta lagu/musik dengan berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta. Ketentuan mengenai hak cipta merupakan langkah negara untuk menjaga hak cipta dari para pencipta atau pemegang hak cipta agar tidak terjadinya pelanggaran hak cipta. Salah satu prinsip yang memberikan pengecualian dalam gubahan lagu dan karya cipta lainnya yaitu prisnip fair use. Namun prinsip ini masih belum jelas pengaturannya dalam sistem hukum hak cipta di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum (normative), dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statue approach). Hasil pembahasan penelitian ini yaitu gubahan lagu non komersil bedasarkan prinsip fair use bukanlah suatu pelangaran hak cipta semasih tidak melanggar ketentuan dalam Pasal 43-44 UUHC. upaya hukum dalam pelanggaran hak cipta dapat meneggunakan jalur litigasi dan non litigasi. kesimpulan dari penelitian ini yaitu fair use merupakan prinsip yang memberikan batasan dalam suatu penggunaan karya cipta yang sudah terdaftar, prinsip fair use memberikan pengecualian terkait batas wajar penggunaan dalam suatu karya cipta seperti lag
KOLABORASI BANK, PPATK DAN OJK DALAM PENCEGAHAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG DI INDONESIA
Pencucian uang merupakan salah satu tindak pidana yang menjadi tindak pidana tambahan seperti kasus korupsi, narkoba atau lainnya. Pejabat di Indonesia menjadi salah satu pelaku kejahatan yang paling banyak dalam melakukan tindak pidana pencucian uang. Pencucian uang dapat berupa aset, kendaraan saham ataupun uang tunai dan sebagainya. Transaksi keuangan pejabat seharusnya terus diawasi agar dapat terlihat nilai yang wajar berupa tabunngan. Yang berhak atas tabungan tersebut adalah bank, tentunya pihak bank memerlukan kerjasama dan landasan hukum dalam melakukan setiap pengawasan. Penelitian ini bertujuan Untuk menganalisis Bentuk Kolaborasi Antara Pusat pelaporan dan Analisi Transaksi Keuangan (PPATK), Otoritas Jasa Keuangan dan Bank dalam Melakukan Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dan untuk mengidentifikasi dan menganalisis Dampak Kolaborasi Antara Pusat pelaporan dan Analisi Transaksi Keuangan (PPATK), Otoritas Jasa Keuangan dan Bank dalam Melakukan Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode normatif. Penelitian ini ditemukan bahwa fakta dari kolaborasi beberapa instansi yang terkait dengan tindak pidana pencucian uang seperti Bank Indonesia, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan bahkan PPATK sudah berjalan dan memiliki landasan. Akan tetapi hal ini tidak mencegahnya tindakan pencucian uang. Sehingga dalam kesimpulan penulis pada penelitian ini akan memberikan rekomendasi terhadap pelaksanaan dan mekanisme dalam pencegahan tindak pidana pencucian uang pada masa yang akan datang
TANGGUNG JAWAB MUTLAK TERHADAP PEMBERIAN GANTI RUGI KECELAKAAN PESAWAT UDARA PADA PENUMPANG YANGMENINGGAL (STUDI KASUS KECELAKAAN PESAWAT SRIWIJAYA AIR SJ-182)
Abstrak: Fokus Penelitian ini adalah terhadap tanggung jawab mutlak terhadap pemberian ganti rugi kecelakaan pesawat udara studi kasus terhadap kecelakaan pesawat udara Sriwijaya Air Sj-182. Dalam penelitian ini akan dibahas Bagaimana tanggung jawab mutlak pengangkut terhadap korban kecelakaan pesawat udara menurut undang-undang nomor 1 Tahun 2009 tentang penerbangan dan Bagaimana mekanisme tanggung jawab mutlak terhadap ganti rugi korban kecelakaan pesawat udara terhadap penumpang yang meninggal dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2009 tentang penerbangan (Studi Kasus Kecelakaan Pesawat Sriwijaya Air SJ-182). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undang, pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2009 tentang Penerbangan memberikan kerangka kerja yang solid untuk memastikan bahwa korban kecelakaan pesawat dan keluarganya ditangani dengan cara yang adil dan efektif serta melindungi hak-hak mereka untuk ganti rugi di Pasal 141 ayat 1 dan besaran ganti rugi yang wajib dibayarkan ialah terdapat di pasal 165 Undang - Undang No. 1 Tahun 2009 dan Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan No. 77 Tahun 2011 terkait Tanggung Jawab Pengangkutan. Kedepannya Sebaiknya diterapkan peningkatan transparansi dalam proses klaim ganti rugi agar informasi lebih mudah diakses oleh keluarga korban, mempercepat penanganan klaim untuk meringankan beban finansial keluarga, serta melatih staf yang terlibat dengan keahlian komunikasi dan pemahaman hukum yang mendalam. Selain itu, penting juga untuk memperkuat kerjasama dengan lembaga penyelidikan kecelakaan, memperbarui undang-undang yang ada untuk menyesuaikan dengan kondisi ekonomi dan sosial terkini, serta mengembangkan sistem penyelesaian sengketa alternatif seperti mediasi.Kata Kunci: Tanggung Jawab Mutlak; Ganti Rugi; Kecelakaan Pesawat Udara
CYBERTURFING AND GLOBAL LEGAL FRAMEWORKS: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF REGULATORY RESPONSES
Cyberturfing, a form of deceptive practice that involves the manipulation of public perception by means of systematic disinformation campaigns, has become an international problem. It compromises democratic institutions, distorts market competition, and undermines public trust in digital communication. This study offers an integrated analysis of cyberturfing by discussing its development, central methodologies, and socio-political implications. Utilizing a comparative law perspective, it examines how various jurisdictions across the globe, such as the United States, European Union, and some Asian jurisdictions, have enacted, regulated, or reacted to cyberturfing by way of judicial precedent. It places special emphasis on the enforcement challenge, limits of jurisdiction, and technology's twofold enabling/frustration effect. Additionally, it reflects on how consumer rights, freedom of expression, and cybercrime legislation play roles in crafting regulatory interventions. On that basis, the paper makes recommendations for a harmonious international order where the effectiveness of regulation is matched with safeguarding digital rights. The study adds to existing literature on digital governance and provides policy directions to regulators, legal academics, and tech interests interested in mitigating the ubiquitous scope of cyberturfing