Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sriwijaya: Open Journal Systems
Not a member yet
807 research outputs found
Sort by
Kebijakan Sustainable Forest Management Sebagai Bagian Indonesia’S Folu Net Sink 2030
Get PDFThis study aims to determine the policies taken by the Government of Indonesia as a party to the Paris Agreement related to efforts to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This legal research is normative legal research using a conceptual approach that is based on the development of views and doctrines in the science of law. The legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials collected through library research techniques and analyzed using the deduction method. The results of this study indicate that Indonesia carries out constant GHG emission reductions as stated in the Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC). One of the sectors with the largest proportion of GHG emission reductions in Indonesia's NDC is the forestry sector, so forestry mitigation is vital for Indonesia. Forestry and Other Land Use (FOLU) is a component of the NDC which is targeted to contribute 60% of the total GHG reduction. The implementation of Indonesia's FOLU Net Sink 2030 is based on the Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) component where sustainable and sustainable forest management is a big task to be implemented and regulated carefully and wisely so that the GHG emission reduction target contained in the NDC can be achieved and can reach net zero emissions in 2060
Indonesia’s Contra-Productive Regulation against the Rights of Unskilled Workers for Balinese in New Zealand
No full textNew Zealand relies heavily on its agricultural industry. There are over 4,150 cultivators in the horticultural sector. They require the cooperation of foreign workers. Some of them were recruited from Indonesia, where most of the labour force is poor and unskilled. This research is conducted to analyse the compatibility of legislation and policy in Indonesia and New Zealand. So, they may enjoy their rights and possibilities for choosing, acquiring, or migrating from one work to another and earning a fair salary, whether domestically or internationally. Based on the contextual law method, it has been concluded that New Zealand’s laws provide excellent regulations for such enjoyment. Regarding the equal enjoyment of their fundamental employment rights, Indonesian Law and policy have failed to meet the needs of employees. This article demonstrates the Indonesian and New Zealand legal systems’ capacity and the need for Indonesian Law to be reconstructed to fulfil workers' demands
Single Shareholder Company in Africa, America and Australia: A Comparative Analysis
Get PDFSingle Person Companies (SPCs), known as One-Person Companies (OPCs), are a revolutionary concept and a new invention in the field of international company law. This study aims to investigate the meaning of OPC and how it is used in three different continents, namely Africa, America, and Australia, focusing on legal entity, OPC incorporation process, minimum share capital, nominee appointment, and OPC conversion. The researchers used the doctrinal data collection method to study relevant journals, articles, books, papers, and internet sources. When choosing the sample States, the researchers use the Gross Domestic Products (GDPs) as a methodological yardstick. According to the findings, only a natural person may form an OPC in some jurisdictions, such as Caledonia and New Zealand. The ability of both natural and legal persons to incorporate OPC has been made explicit in nations including South Africa, Nigeria, Algeria, and Argentina. The outcome further illustrates that in nations like the USA and Caledonia, only citizens of such nations or individuals who are residents of New Zealand are eligible to incorporate OPC. The minimum share capital for creating an OPC should be reasonable to enable the lower class to establish OPC and fully control the business
Finding the Truth in A Virtual Courtroom: Criminal Trials in Indonesia during the COVID-19
Get PDFVideo conferencing through video call platforms, such as Zoom and Google Meet, has become a useful option for judges holding criminal trials during the COVID-19 pandemic in many countries. This trend also occurred in Indonesia. Some judges believe that video conferencing technology will help them accomplish justice in an emergency, referring to the legal maxim 'salus populi suprema lex esto’ or ‘let the welfare of the people be the supreme law’. Although virtual trials assist courts in preventing the spread of the deadly virus, they have also affected the work of judges to reach the substantive truth. This paper examines the challenges concerning the rights of the accused and technological matters that have emerged under the use of virtual courtrooms and, in some ways, led to unfair trial procedures. We argue that the absence of laws that regulate virtual courtrooms, along with an outdated the Code of Criminal Procedure in Indonesia (KUHAP), can lead to miscarriages of justice. The arguments presented in this article are based on survey data conducted from December 2020 to January 2021. The respondents are judges from Indonesia's western, middle, and eastern regions who used video conference facilities for criminal court hearings during the COVID-19 outbreak of 2020-2021
Relationship between the Obligations from the European Convention on Human Rights and the Accession to the European Union
Get PDFBosnia and Herzegovina (B&H) has difficulty integrating and moving closer to the goal of becoming a member of the European Union (EU). From the legal perspective, the main issue is the need to fulfil the accession criteria. The article aims to examine the relationship between the obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights and Basic Freedoms (ECHR) and the obligations related to the European Union (EU) accession process, with emphasis on Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H) as an EU membership candidate country. At first sight, those two obligations are separate. However, upon close examination, a strong link between those two obligations can be established using normative research with a historical approach, statute and case-based approach. On the other hand, the constitutional system of B&H has been described as discriminatory by numerous judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and, most prominently, by the Sejdic-Finci case. B&H has difficulties implementing those judgments. Implementing those judgments is also set as one of the requirements of EU accession. Even if the two obligations seem separate at first sight, the ECHR has a special position within the law of the EU and is especially important in the accession of new Member States, including B&H. The research results show a special position of the ECHR in EU law and a link between the obligations under the ECHR and EU accession
PENYELESAIAN KASUS PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA AKIBAT PANDEMI COVID-19 BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG PENYELESAIAN PERSELISIHAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL
Get PDFPandemi COVID-19 telah mengakibatkan banyak dampak dalam berbagai sektor kehidupan masyarakat khususnya di Indonesia. Banyaknya pekerja dipecat oleh perusahaan karena banyak perusahaan yang mengalami kebangkrutan akibat pandemi. Banyaknya pekerja yang tidak mengetahui tata cara penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial berdasarkan Undang Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial. Dalam menyelesaikan masalah ini, Undang Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial telah menetapkan bahwa harus dilakukan dengan konsensus (non-litigasi) terlebih dahulu, tetapi kenyataannya tidak demikian. Pekerja/buruh secara langsung mengajukan gugatan ke Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial tanpa terlebih dahulu membuat penyelesaian melalui musyawarah dan konsensus. Penelitian ini adalah jenis penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan hukum dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil diskusi menunjukkan penyelesaian kasus penghentian kerja berdasarkan Undang Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial dapat dilakukan dengan beberapa cara, yaitu non litigasi yang berorientasi pada musyawarah dan konsensus serta litigasi dengan mengajukan gugatan ke pengadilan. Undang Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial menekankan penyelesaian kasus penghentian kerja harus dilakukan melalui musyawarah konsensus terlebih dahulu, yakni perundingan bipartit. Dengan cara ini, jika kesepakatan tidak tercapai, penyelesaian dilakukan melalui mediasi, konsiliasi, atau arbitrase. Dengan cara ini, jika kesepakatan masih belum tercapai, penyelesaian baru menggunakan metode pengajuan gugatan ke Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial. Ke depan, penulis menyarankan agar upaya dilakukan untuk terus meningkatkan kesadaran hukum para peminat terkait penyelesaian kasus penghentian pekerjaan
KEDUDUKAN AKTA YANG DIKELUARKAN OLEH NOTARIS YANG SEDANG DALAM MASA TAHANAN
Get PDFThe notary in carrying out his position must remember that the deed made by or before him is an authentic deed that becomes a document/state archive, and the agreement stated therein becomes a law for those who make it. The important role of a Notary in making a deed is inseparable from the possibility of actions that are contrary to the propriety prevailing in the society in carrying out the duties and functions of a Notary. A notary who is currently in detention as long as he has not been dismissed as a notary is still capable of making an authentic deed, but in terms of propriety, this is not justified. UUJN contains sanctions against Notaries who are proven to have committed violations, during this period the Deeds made downgraded from Authentic Deeds to Underhanded Deeds. This legal research uses a statute approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. In this context, it is concluded that the Notary is temporarily dismissed from his position because he is currently undergoing a detention period. After the temporary dismissal period ends due to the detention period, the Notary will be rehabilitated after the temporary dismissal period ends. The rehabilitation in question implies that the notary concerned is activated and returned to his original position. Therefore, if the notary is returned to his original position, the deed made by the notary is authentic. In this case, if the detention period is more than 6 months, while the temporary dismissal period has ended, the notary has authority according to his functions and duties
ASPEK HUKUM PELAKSANAAN PERLINDUNGAN KERAHASIAAN PENYIMPANAN DANA NASABAH PADA BUMD BANK LAMPUNG
Get PDFRahasia perbankan penting sebab bank menjadi lembaga terpercaya harus merahasiakan sesuatu hubungan menggunakan simpanan serta penyimpanannya. Maka, bank menjadi entitas juga pihak terkait, termasuk karyawan serta manajemen senior bank bersangkutan wajib mengetahui rezim kerahasiaan perbankan untuk menghindari hukuman pidana, administrasi, serta sosial oleh warga. Penerapan hal tersifat rahasia (informasi) khususnya pada bank sangat sulit dilakukan, sebab tak ada definisi seragam tentang informasi dari informasi serta data nasabah bisa digolongkan menjadi rahasia oleh bank. Bank Lampung selalu menjaga misteri perbankan. Adapun bentuk upaya bisa lakukan Bank Lampung untuk menjaga keamanan misteri nasabah bank, terdapat tanyakan identitas nasabah pengadilan, bank tak sampaikan informasi apapun. Rahasia perbankan penting, sebab bank menjadi lembaga terpercaya harus rahasiakan segala suatu berhubungan menggunakan penyimpan serta simpanannya. Tentang tatacara perlindungan hukum pada kerahasiaan dana nasabah menyimpan dananya pada BUMD Bank Lampung, khususnya maraknya transaksi perbankan menyangkut himpunan dana rakyat seperti melalui tabungan, giro, deposito, serta lainnya. Sedangkan sesudah menghimpun dana tadi, bank harus menyalurkan dana tadi pada masyarakat melalui pemberian pinjaman. Upaya lain yaitu pencatatan baik atas operasional bank atau transaksi dilakukan oleh bank adalah suatu keharusan. Saran Manajemen Bank: usahakan waspada pada penerapan prinsip kehati-hatian bank terutamanya pada mendapatkan dana disimpan dari nasabah menggunakan cara tanyakan sumber dana nasabah terutama simpanan besar, supaya bank bisa menghindari upaya kejahatan seperti uang pencucian
PERAN PPAT DALAM OPTIMALISASI PENERIMAAN NEGARA DARI SEKTOR PERPAJAKAN
Get PDFPajak sebagai kewajiban kenegaraan merupakan wujud peran serta rakyat dalam membiayai berbagai pengeluaran negara yang pemungutan pajak dilaksanakan berkaitan dengan perbuatan hukum yang bergerak dalam lingkungan hukum perdata, seperti pendapatan, kekayaan, perjanjian, penyerahan, pemindahan hak karena pewarisan, dan sebagainya. Pajak sumber penerimaan negara untuk pelaksanaan pembangunan untuk kesejahteraan rakyat.[1] Peran pajak dalam pengelolaan keuangan negara sangat penting untuk mewujudkan stabilisasi ekonomi dan melaksanakan pembangunan yang berkelanjutan.[2] Peran penerimaan negara dari sektor pajak dalam APBN 2021 adalah sebesar Rp.1,546,51 triliun atau 77,20% dari APBN sebesar Rp. 2.003,06 triliun.[3] Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) secara khusus mengemban tugas dalam membantu pelaksanaan administrasi perpajakan yang berkaitan langsung dengan objek pajak dalam ruang lingkup pekerjaannya sebagai pejabat umum yang diberi kewenangan untuk membuat akta-akta otentik mengenai perbuatan hukum tertentu mengenai hak atas tanah atau Hak Milik Atas Satuan Rumah Susun.[4]Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui dan menganalisis peran PPAT dalam optimalisasi penerimaan negara dari sektor perpajakan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, dengan menggunakan pendekatan sejarah dan perundang-undangan, karya ilmiah, buku-buku, dan jurnal yang berkaitan dengan tema penulisan. Penelitian ini menggunakan bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier, menyimpulkan pelaksanaan PPAT dalam membantu administrasi perpajakan telah sesuai dengan perundang-undang, apabila ada perbedaan data pada laporan PPAT ke Kantor Pelayanan Pajak dengan nilai transaksi yang seharusnya, maka Wajib Pajak dan PPAT dikenakan sanksi dan pengenaan tarif pajak terkait akta yang dibuat oleh PPAT telah sesuai dengan Undang-Undang
TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS TERHADAP PENOLAKAN UNTUK MENJADI PEMEGANG PROTOKOL NOTARIS
Get PDFAbstrak: Notaris adalah pejabat umum yang memiliki kewenangan untuk membuat akta otentik. Setiap akta otentik tersebut memiliki kekuatan hukum yang sempurna, yang mana tidak diperlukannya alat bukti lain dalam pembuktian untuk memutuskan suatu perkara. Sehingga isinya sangat dirahasikan dan tidak semua orang dapat melihat isinya, kecuali para pihak dan yang pihak lain yang sudah ditentukan dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Selain membuat akta otentik, notaris juga memiliki kewajiban untuk menyimpan akta-akta yang dibuatnya berupa minuta akta dan dokumen-dokumen lainnya dalam protokol notaris yang menjadi bagian dari pengadministrasian kantor. Protokol Notaris tersebut wajib dijaga dan dirawat karena sifatnya yang termasuk dalam arsip negara. Maka dari itu, sangat diperlukan penyerahan protokol notaris kepada pihak lain yang telah ditunjuk sebagai pemegang atau penerima protokol jika notaris pembuat akta tersebut bermasalah atau yang termasuk dalam kategori di Pasal 62 Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Namun, dalam praktiknya sangat dimungkinkan jika pemegang atau penerima protokol menolak untuk menjadi pemegang protokol atas alasan apapun, seperti sedang sakit, kantor pemegang protokol yang sempit sehingga tidak ada tempat lagi untuk menyimpan protokol, dan sebagainya. Hal tersebut tidak diperbolehkan karena notaris wajib untuk menerima protokol meskipun tidak adanya dasar hukum yang jelas. Kewajiban tersebut tersirat dalam Pasal 2 ayat (3) huruf c Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi manusia Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 dan putusan pengadilan yang diteliti dalam penelitian ini. Maka dari itu, dalam putusan yang diteliti dalam penelitian ini menjadi dasar bahwa seorang notaris diwajibkan untuk menerima protokol notaris. Tanggung jawab yang diambil oleh pemegang protokol yang telah menolak untuk menjadi pemegang protokol notaris namun ingin membatalkannya adalah dengan membuat Pernyataan Pencabutan atas Surat Penolakan Menjadi Protokol meskipun penerima protokol dalam keadaan tidak memungkinkan.Kata Kunci: Protokol Notaris; Tanggung Jawab; Tolak Abstract: Notary is a public official who has the authority to make authentic deeds. Each authentic deed has perfect legal force, which does not require other evidence in proof to decide a case. So that the contents are very confidential and not everyone can see the contents, except for the parties and other parties specified in the laws and regulations. In addition to making authentic deeds, notaries also have an obligation to keep the deeds they make in the form of deed minutes and other documents in the notary protocol which is part of the office administration. The Notary Protocol must be maintained and cared for because of its nature which is included in the state archives. Therefore, it is very necessary to hand over the notary protocol to another party who has been appointed as the holder or recipient of the protocol if the notary making the deed has a problem or is included in the category in Article 62 of the Notary Law. However, in practice it is very possible if the holder or recipient of the protocol refuses to become the protocol holder for any reason, such as being sick, the protocol holder's office is so small that there is no more space to store the protocol, and so on. This is not allowed because the notary is obliged to accept the protocol even though there is no clear legal basis. This obligation is implied in Article 2 paragraph (3) letter c of the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 19 of 2019 and the court decisions examined in this study. Therefore, the decisions examined in this study serve as the basis that a notary is required to accept the notary protocol. The responsibility taken by a protocol holder who has refused to become a notary protocol holder but wants to cancel it is to make a Statement of Revocation of the Letter of Refusal to Become a Protocol even though the protocol recipient is in an impossible situation.Keywords: Notarial Protocol; Responsibility; Refusa