Emerita (E-Journal)
Not a member yet
1236 research outputs found
Sort by
Antifonte V 51, [And.] IV 7, PS-X. ATH I 5
Get PDFThis paper is related to the most ancient Attic prose writers, Le., Antiphon, Andocides, and the so-called Old Oligarch. The author intends to propose three new conjectures which are always supported by the present manuscript tradition of each text. Syntactic and rhetorical questions have also been taken into account.No disponible
Una revisión de la tradición textual de la Vita Desiderii de Sisebuto
Get PDFIn this paper the scholar revises the manuscript tradition of Sisebut's Vita Desiderii. He has studied for the first time all the manuscripts involved in the transmission of this work. As a result of this analysis there are some new aspects about the relations between manuscripts T and J and their relation to the famous Codex Ouetensis of bishop Pelagius (XIIth Century), now lost. The conclusion of this paper is a partial modification of the Vita Desiderii's stemma established by Gil.No disponible
Multas per gentes et multa per aequora vectus (Cat. c. CI 1). Catulo fra Omero ed Apollonio Rodio
Get PDFCompared with the current opinion for which Catullus would have imitated in c. CI 1 Horn. Odys. I 1-4, in this paper we would like to show the dependance on an Apollonius Rhodius's passage of Argonautica (III 348-349) which is also modeled on the Homer's passage itself.No disponible
El hidrónimo prerromano Mira
Get PDFThe aim of this paper is to study the toponymic element Mira as it is present at old and new place names in the Iberian Peninsula, in order to establish its diffusion area and to bear out its Indo-European origins, specifically belonging to the old European hydronymy system.No disponible
ϝορθασία, Ὀρθια y Ἄρτεμισ Ὀρθια en Laconia
No full textAn exhaustive review of the epigraphical forms attested in the Laconian Sanctuary of Artemis Orthia leads to the conclusion that they cannot be reduced to a single form, as it is usually assumed. In fact, they conceal forms belonging to two different roots, lE *ṷerdh- grow' and *Hṛdh- (from *ṛHdh-) '[set] straight', whose outcomes seem to have been confused from the Hellenistic period onwards, giving rise to a set of hybrid forms. To *ṷerdh- belong three forms attested in the early period: ϝορυασία, ϝορυαία (as the derivatives of *ϝορυά or *ϝόρυασις) and ϝορυεία, a variant of the last one (cf. Μαλεάτεια for Μαλεάταια): none of them occur as an epithet of Artemis, which suggests that they denote an old fertility goddess 'related with growth' or 'making grow'. On the other side, the form Ὀρυία is a derivative of όρυός 'straight' (*Hṛdh-ṷó-: av.ərəduuna-, lat. arduus), to be understood as 'straight' and, secondarily, as 'setting straight', which is attested (without ϝ) already in the VIIth Century and denotes an original healing-goddess protecting childbirth; its variants are attested also in later inscriptions, always as a surname of Artemis, the wild-nature deity who assimilated both Ὀρυασία and Ὀρυία at a later stage.No disponibl
Due noti a papiri Palau-Ribes
Get PDFProecdosis of six small fragments of Greek papyri from the collection Palau-Ribes of the Seminari de Papirologia, Institut de Teologia Fonamental, San Cugat del Vallès. They are alI private documents of the Byzantine period (sec. V/VI), as a contract of sale (inv. 230), a dialysis (inv. 236) from Aphrodites kame, two leases of land (inv. 24, 233) from the Oxyrhynchite nomos, and two sales for future delivery (inv. 243, 243 a) from the Hermopolite, of which we can read only a few lines or words.No dispinibl
Observaciones críticas a los Medicamina Faciei Femineae de Ovidio
Get PDFIn this paper several passages of Ovid's Medicamina Faciei Femineae are critically analysed.No disponible
El lenguaje tradicional de la Tebaida Homérica
Get PDFThis work examines the traditional language of the cyclical Thebais fragments by studying linguistic aod formulaic data with a view towards establishing its chronology relative to the two great Homeric copies. From this analysis we conclude that 1) there are no definitive data to establish a post-Homeric character for the poem; 2) the concurrence of various non-probative data leads us to consider as more likely a post-Homeric date for the poem's written text; and 3) the poem's fragments show a language sufficiently traditional for us to conclude that its written transmission cannot have occurred very much later than Homer.No disponible