Sapporo Gakuin University (SGU): Repository / 札幌学院大学学術機関リポジトリ
Not a member yet
3005 research outputs found
Sort by
Could Heidegger Criticize Traditional Ontology Truly? (2)
20世紀最大の哲学書と評されるハイデガーの『存在と時間』は1927年にその前半が公刊されたものの,その後半はついに最終的に仕上げられることなく,未完のままに放置された。この後半部分では西洋哲学の伝統的な存在論の批判と「解体」の作業が展開されるはずであった。この後半部分にかんするハイデガーの直接の草稿は残っていないが,その後のいくつかの講義や著作のなかでこの後半部分の仕上げが試みられており,これらからそのおおよその内容を推察することができる。本論文では,ハイデガーの講義と著作からこの後半部分の内容を推察しながら,伝統的な存在論とハイデガーの存在論とを対比させ,ハイデガーが真に伝統的な存在論の「解体」という革新的な課題をはたすことができたのかどうかを論じたい。伝統的な存在論はいわば主観を捨象した客体的な存在論であるのに対し,ハイデガーの存在論は「世界内存在」および「現実存在」としての人間存在の分析から存在の意味を主観的な時間に見出そうとして客体を捨象するいわば主体的な存在論である。そもそも主体的存在論によって客体的存在論を「解体」するという作業自体,これらの存在論のレヴェルの差異を踏まえない,無謀な試みであったのではないか。私見によれば,ハイデガーによる伝統的存在論の「解体」の試みもまた,『存在と時間』が未完のままに終わったことと深く関わりまたこれと並行して,未完のままに終わらざるをえなかったように思われる。“Being and Time” by Martin Heidegger has been described as the greatest philosophy book of the 20th century. The first half of the book was published in 1927, but the second half remained unfinished. This unfinished half was supposed to focus on criticism and the ‘destruction’ of traditional ontology in Western philosophy. No draft of the second half created by Heidegger exists. But he did try to complete that part in his lectures and writings, from which the content can be approximately inferred. In this paper, I infer the content of that unfinished second half based on Heidegger’s lectures and writings, with the aim of comparing traditional ontology with Heidegger’s ontology as well as discussing whether he would have been able to truly accomplish the revolutionary task of ‘destroying’ traditional ontology. Traditional ontology might be described as objective ontology where the subjective view is eliminated. In contrast, Heidegger’s ontology, in a way, is a subjective ontology where an objective view is deleted in an attempt to discover the meaning of existence in subjective time based on an analysis of human existence as ‘being in the world’ and ‘Dasein’(being there). Heidegger sought to achieve the ‘destruction’ of objective ontology by means of subjective ontology. Was this not a reckless attempt by Heidegger, who did not account for differences in levels between objective ontology and subjective ontology? From the author’s perspective, Heidegger’s attempt to ‘destroy’ traditional ontology was destined to be unsuccessful, being deeply linked to and parallel with “Being and Time” having been left unfinished.Bulletin論文Articledepartmental bulletin pape
Support for Students with Developmental Disabilities in Their Studies and Employment, and a University-Wide Compulsory Faculty and Staff Development (FD/SD) Workshop
札幌学院大学では,発達障害を含む多様な学生の修学就職支援の充実を図るため,全教職員を対象にしたFD/SD研修会を4年連続で開催した.昨年度からは学長からの呼びかけで,他大学では例を見ない全学の全教職員必修型研修会と位置付けて実施した.職員の参加率は2か年とも非常に高い水準であったが,教員については低く,補助金上の目標でもあった全教職員参加率75%を達成できなかった.発達障害に関する全学的な啓蒙啓発の難しさを再認識する厳しい結果となった.本学は「障害学生修学支援ネットワーク拠点校」としての使命もあり,取り組みの過程を可視化して敢えて記録に残し,今後の礎としたい.
For the fourth consecutive year, Sapporo Gakuin University held an FD/SD workshop for all faculty members and staff to improve educational and employment support for a variety of students, including those with developmental disabilities. Since last year, at the initiative of the university’s president, it has been positioned as a university-wide compulsory workshop for all faculty members and staff, which is something that is not seen in other universities. The participation rate of the staff was high for both years but that of faculty members was low, and thus, the target of 75% participation could not be met. This bleak outcome highlighted the difficulty of raising awareness about developmental disabilities throughout the university. As part of the university’s mission to become a ‘hub with an educational support network for students with disabilities’, we would like to visualize and document the process of the initiative to establish it as a framework for future use.Bulletin特集「コロナ禍における多様なニーズのある学生に対する修学就職支援Ⅱ」Special Topic: Study and Employment Support for Students with Diverse Needs Amid the Corona Pandemic II調査報告departmental bulletin pape
再考 H. Welzel とZong Uk Tjong ―鄭鍾勗博士没40年・H. ヴェルツェルはJ. ビンダーの門人か―
Bulletin論説Articledepartmental bulletin pape