1,721,002 research outputs found
Enver Orman: Hegel'in Mutlak İdealizmi (Hegel's Absolute Idealism)
No full textON HEGEL’S ABSOLUTE IDEALISM
Hegel was always considered as a great philosopher in history of philosophy because of his significant and systematic contribution to modern philosophy. In this article the main concern is to represent and criticize an important work on Hegel written by Enver Orman. Orman’s book called Hegel’s Absolute Idealism, focuses on his concept of ‘absolute idealism’, which is differentiated from classical and German idealism. Orman’s book represents an important contribution to Hegel, which has been never made in Turkey. While he concentrates on the problem of absolute idealism in Hegel philosophy, he also gives a general framework of Hegel’s philosophy. His work is also a kind of plea for Hegel, against those who consider Hegel as conservative, idealist, and rationalist. Therefore, for Orman, Hegel’s absolute idealism has a phenomenological, dialectical, and empirical character
Marx and Hegel on the Dialectic of the Individual and the Social
No full textMarx and Hegel on the Dialectic of the Individual and the Social is a detailed investigation of the major works of Hegel and the young Marx with exploring how the concept of the individual is positioned within their ontologies and how this positioning is reflected in their related political views. Instead of contrasting a Marxist understanding of the individual with that of a liberal thinker, Sevgi Dogan chooses to take Hegel’s theory of the state as representative of the modern state, which Marx criticizes. The decision to be in opposition to Hegel rather than some other liberal thinkers is important for two reasons. First, since Marx has developed many of his early ideas in critical interaction with Hegel, this comparative approach enables the book to present a more thorough and well-grounded exposition of Marx’s arguments. Second, since Hegel himself has also criticized the concepts of liberal ideology in many respects, differentiating Marx’s arguments from those of Hegel’s enables the book to underline how and why Hegel’s critique of liberal ideology falls short of actually empowering individuals in the way that Marx’s account does. © 2018 The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc. All rights reserved
Italyan marksizmi’nde praksis felsefesi
No full textL’articolo ricostruisce la storia della diffusione delle opere di Marx in Italia dalla metà del diciannovesimo secolo, con la elaborazione di un marxismo peculiare, fin dall’inizio intrecciato con la ricezione degli scritti marxiani. L’autore si sofferma in maniera particolare sulla fortuna del primo del libro del Capitale e del Manifesto e sulla vicenda delle traduzioni delle Tesi su Feuerbach. In tale prospettiva la riflessione di Antonio Labriola rappresenta una discontinuità, per la più ampia conoscenza della letteratura marxista e per la costruzione di una teoria originale. Con riferimento al “ritorno a Marx” nei Quaderni del carcere di Antonio Gramsci, l’articolo studia la presenza di Marx nel periodo fascista e negli intellettuali in esilio, delineando la storia delle edizioni e delle traduzioni nel secondo dopoguerra.The article takes into account the history of Marx's works in Italy from the mid-nineteenth century, with the elaboration of a peculiar Marxism, intertwined with the reception of Marxian writings. The author focuses in particular on the fortune of the volume one of the Capital and the Manifesto of the Communist Party and on the history of the translations of the Theses on Feuerbach. In this perspective, the philosophy of Antonio Labriola represents a discontinuity, due to the wider knowledge of Marxist literature and to the construction of an original theory. With reference to the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci, the article takes into consideration the presence of Marx in the fascist period and in the intellectuals in exile, studying the history of editions and translations after the Second World War
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
