329,060 research outputs found
Reply to Comment by A.P. Nutman et al. on “Tectonics of the Isua Supracrustal Belt 1: P-T-X-d Constraints of a Poly-Metamorphic Terrane” by A. Ramírez-Salazar et al. and “Tectonics of the Isua Supracrustal Belt 2: Microstructures Reveal Distributed Strain in the Absence of Major Fault Structures” by J. Zuo et al.
No full textStructural and metamorphic analyses from the works under discussion (Ramírez-Salazar et al., 2021, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020tc006516; Zuo et al., 2021, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020tc006514) show that the Isua supracrustal rocks can be interpreted to record one single deformation and metamorphic event featuring quasi-homogeneous deformation and amphibolite facies metamorphism, followed by late static retrogression or thermal event(s). Observed deformation and metamorphic records are consistent with three hypotheses: (a) they represent Neoarchean plate tectonic overprints following Eoarchean plate tectonic evolution (e.g., Nutman et al., 2022, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021TC007036); (b) they represent Eoarchean heat-pipe and/or plate tectonic deformation that survived later tectonic event(s) (e.g., Ramírez-Salazar et al., 2021, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020tc006516; Zuo et al., 2021, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020tc006514), and; (c) they represent one major Neoarchean tectonic event, such that the Isua supracrustal belt (ISB) records Eoarchean protolith-related processes but does not record Eoarchean metamorphism nor deformation. While a heat-pipe model for crustal formation is central to hypothesis 2, it is also a viable crustal formation mechanism for hypothesis 3 where the ISB would still form in a heat-pipe setting in Eoarchean time, but the major deformation of the heat-pipe lithosphere happened during Neoarchean time, probably by (proto-)plate tectonic processes. If the data presented in Zuo et al. (2021), https://doi.org/10.1029/2020tc006514 and Ramírez-Salazar et al. (2021), https://doi.org/10.1029/2020tc006516 only reflect Neoarchean histories, then these cannot be used to refute or support any Eoarchean geodynamic background for the formation of the ISB
An algorithm for finding a common solution for a system of mixed equilibrium problem, quasi-variational inclusion problem and fixed point problem of nonexpansive semigroup
No full textTyt. z nagłówka.Bibliogr. s. 483.Dostępny również w formie drukowanej.ABSTRACT: In this paper, we introduce a hybrid iterative scheme for finding a common element of the set of solutions for a system of mixed equilibrium problems, the set of common fixed points for a nonexpansive semigroup and the set of solutions of the quasi-variational inclusion problem with multi-valued maximal monotone mappings and inverse-strongly monotone mappings in a Hilbert space. Under suitable conditions, some strong convergence theorems are proved. Our results extend some recent results in the literature. KEYWORDS: nonexpansive semigroup, mixed equilibrium problem, viscosity approximation method, quasi-variational inclusion problem, multi-valued maximal monotone mappings, alpha-inverse-strongly monotone mapping
Policy preferences for water sharing in Alberta, Canada
No full textAbstract not availableH. Bjornlund, A. Zuo, S. Wheeler, W. Xu, J. Edward
Diffusive author(s), cohesive author: Analysis of S/N (1994)
No full textThis study indicates the ways in which various aspects of the author(s) are brought forth in Dumb type’s performance art, the S/N production. Previous research has suggested a non-hierarchical organization of Dumb type and the absence of a “privileged author” in Dumb type’s collaborative work, S/N. However, the results that I have investigated from member’s interviews on the creative process of S/N along with my analysis of the recorded images of S/N, indicate a different aspect of the author(s). First, S/N was created through, so to speak, the collective ideas of the members of Dumb type. Further, S/N has at least nine quotations from previous performances, installations, and printed writings, besides the work-in-progress technique. Explicating one of the “author functions” as given by Michel Foucault, each text has plural subjects of the author. However, it has been revealed from members’ interviews that Teiji Furuhashi had a decision-making role in selecting the members’ ideas within the performance. Since then, S/N has had plural subjects of creation; however, Furuhashi is one of the subjects of creation along with the “privileged author.” S/N has plural authors (diffusive authors) yet at the same time, it has a “privileged author,” Teiji Furuhashi (cohesive author)
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Family Assessment- Author Index
No full textAuthor Index (12 pages)
A-Z
A
Abbott, D.: 263 Abery, B.: 242 Abidin, R: 81, 265 Abramovitch, R: 134, 135, 136, 137, 139,142,143,144,145,146 Abril, s.: 118 Achenbach, T. M.: 12,47, 118, 223, 265 Acock, A. c.: 206 Adams, G. R: 205 Adams, S. J.: 226 Al-Khayyal, M.: 74 Alexander, J. F.: 75 Allisson, P. D.: 185 Alwin, D. F.: 182,191,194 Amato, P. R: 205- 231, 206, 207, 210, 213,215,216, 219, 221, 222, 224, 227,230 Ammerman, R : 263 Amoloza, T. 0 .: 170, 171,172,176, 179, 187, 188 Anastasi, A.: 265 Anderson, B. J.: 85 Anderson, c.: 117 Anderson, P. P.: 104 Anderson, S. A.: 79, 168, 177 Anthony, J.: 117 Apley, J.: 84 Aponte, H. J.: 117 Appelbaum, M.: 263 Arrington, A.: 11 Asher, S.: 82 Asterita, M. F. : 92 Attneave, c.: 121 Auslander, W. F: 85
Z
Zane, N .: 107, 119 Zetlin, A.: 263 Zill, N.: 83 Zuo, J.: 171, 180, 18
Family Assessment- Author Index
No full textAuthor Index (12 pages)
A-Z
A
Abbott, D.: 263 Abery, B.: 242 Abidin, R: 81, 265 Abramovitch, R: 134, 135, 136, 137, 139,142,143,144,145,146 Abril, s.: 118 Achenbach, T. M.: 12,47, 118, 223, 265 Acock, A. c.: 206 Adams, G. R: 205 Adams, S. J.: 226 Al-Khayyal, M.: 74 Alexander, J. F.: 75 Allisson, P. D.: 185 Alwin, D. F.: 182,191,194 Amato, P. R: 205- 231, 206, 207, 210, 213,215,216, 219, 221, 222, 224, 227,230 Ammerman, R : 263 Amoloza, T. 0 .: 170, 171,172,176, 179, 187, 188 Anastasi, A.: 265 Anderson, B. J.: 85 Anderson, c.: 117 Anderson, P. P.: 104 Anderson, S. A.: 79, 168, 177 Anthony, J.: 117 Apley, J.: 84 Aponte, H. J.: 117 Appelbaum, M.: 263 Arrington, A.: 11 Asher, S.: 82 Asterita, M. F. : 92 Attneave, c.: 121 Auslander, W. F: 85
Z
Zane, N .: 107, 119 Zetlin, A.: 263 Zill, N.: 83 Zuo, J.: 171, 180, 18
From Literature of HUMAN to LITERATURE of Human——An Essay on ZHOU Zuo-ren′s View of ″Literature of Human″
No full text“人的文学”是公认的中国新文学运动的两大中心理论之一,周作人是该理论的代表人物之一。周作人从达尔文进化论出发,将“人”定义为“从动物中进化而来的”,人性等于“神性+兽性”;他的人道主义就是代表“神性”的博爱型人道主义与出于“兽性”的个人主义的结合,人道主义文学是“人”的文学”。由于对自由主义的坚定信念并加以对尼采学说的扬弃,周作人坚持自由与宽容;随着他更多的返回传统和对古希腊、日本人对自然与美的热爱之情的向往,周作人倡导生活艺术化,其文学观也随之更突出人的“文学”。周作人的“人的文学”观是身兼启蒙者与文学家的周作人在特定时空里融合启蒙主义和审美主义的文学观。Literature of human was one of the two central theories in the campaign of the New Literature in China.ZHOU Zuo-ren advocated the theory and was one of the represents.The passage will tell his Literature view from four aspects.First,the humanitarian component of that was started from Darwin′s theory of evolution,″Human″ was definited ″evoluting from Animal″ by ZHOU Zuo-ren;and he believed humanism composed of Godism and Animalism.Second,ZHOU Zuo-ren sent out his humanitarian was formed through merging humanitarianism in the way of universal fraternity with individualism;the former was coming from Godship and the later was coming from beastliness.Third,Mr.ZHOU adhered to freedom and toleration firmly,for he was a liberalist,at the same time,sublating the theory of Nietzsche.Fourth,adding more of the return to the tradition,and the nourishing by Greek and Japanese love of natural beauty,ZHOU Zuo-ren advocated ″art in life″,so,his view of literature was more emphased the LITERATURE of human.ZHOU Zuo-ren′s ″literature of human″was a theory that one who was both an enlightener and a writer conformed to the demand by the specific time in history and the specific country
Ein christliches und trostreiches Gespräch zwischen Gott dem Herren und der betrübten Seel : einer gottseligen und fürnemmen Person zuo Trost
No full textauss eigner Erfahrung gestellet durch Wolfgang Mayern, h. Schrifft Doctorn und Pfarherrn zuo S. Alban in BaselBogensignaturen: A-C
- …
