1,720,982 research outputs found
sj-pdf-1-cpx-10.1177_21677026231164958 – Supplemental material for Cognitive Inhibition in Trauma Recovery Among Asylum Seekers: Test in a Randomized Trial of Mindfulness-Based Trauma Recovery for Refugees
No full textSupplemental material, sj-pdf-1-cpx-10.1177_21677026231164958 for Cognitive Inhibition in Trauma Recovery Among Asylum Seekers: Test in a Randomized Trial of Mindfulness-Based Trauma Recovery for Refugees by Iftach Amir, Anna Aizik-Reebs, Kim Yuval, Yuval Hadash and Amit Bernstein in Clinical Psychological Science</p
Prospective Matched-Controlled Intervention Study of Insight Mindfulness Meditation Retreats
No full textProspective Matched-Controlled Intervention Study of Insight Mindfulness Meditation Retreats
No full textProspective Matched-Controlled Intervention Study of Insight Mindfulness Meditation Retreats
No full textBehavioral Assessment of Mindfulness: Defining Features, Organizing Framework, and Review of Emerging Methods
No full textThe development and implementation of psychometrically sound behavioral measures of mindfulness is important to advancing the science of mindfulness. To help organize, conceptualize, and guide the development of behavioral measures of mindfulness, we propose defining features, and a four-domain framework, of the behavioral assessment of mindfulness. The framework domains include measurement of (I) objects of mindful awareness, (II) time-course of mindful awareness, (III) sensitivity of mindful awareness, and (IV) attitudes towards present moment experience. We describe mindfulness processes in each domain, and review extant behavioral method(s) and specific behavioral measure(s) of mindfulness processes per domain. Four of the 12 reviewed measures demonstrate acceptable reliabilities and preliminary evidence of construct validity as measures of mindfulness processes
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Behavioral Assessment of Mindfulness: Defining Features, Organizing Framework, and Review of Emerging Methods
No full textThe development and implementation of psychometrically sound behavioral measures of mindfulness is important to advancing the science of mindfulness. To help organize, conceptualize, and guide the development of behavioral measures of mindfulness, we propose defining features, and a four-domain framework, of the behavioral assessment of mindfulness. The framework domains include measurement of (I) objects of mindful awareness, (II) time-course of mindful awareness, (III) sensitivity of mindful awareness, and (IV) attitudes towards present moment experience. We describe mindfulness processes in each domain, and review extant behavioral method(s) and specific behavioral measure(s) of mindfulness processes per domain. Four of the 12 reviewed measures demonstrate acceptable reliabilities and preliminary evidence of construct validity as measures of mindfulness processes
Behavioral Assessment of Mindfulness: Defining Features, Organizing Framework, and Review of Emerging Methods
No full textThe development and implementation of psychometrically sound behavioral measures of mindfulness is important to advancing the science of mindfulness. To help organize, conceptualize, and guide the development of behavioral measures of mindfulness, we propose defining features, and a four-domain framework, of the behavioral assessment of mindfulness. The framework domains include measurement of (I) objects of mindful awareness, (II) time-course of mindful awareness, (III) sensitivity of mindful awareness, and (IV) attitudes towards present moment experience. We describe mindfulness processes in each domain, and review extant behavioral method(s) and specific behavioral measure(s) of mindfulness processes per domain. Four of the 12 reviewed measures demonstrate acceptable reliabilities and preliminary evidence of construct validity as measures of mindfulness processes
Single Experience and Self-Implicit Association Test (SES-IAT)
No full textBuddhist thought and contemporary psychological science suggest that an important mechanism through which mindfulness contributes to well-being is by reducing self-referential processing of experience and cultivating selfless processing of experience. Self-referential processing of experience is implicated in prevalent forms of suffering and mental health problems. In contrast, selfless processing of experience is considered to be fundamental for the cultivation of attitudinal qualities of mindfulness (e.g., non-judging) and of a metacognitive process subserving decentering (e.g., disidentification from internal experience). Critically, study of these processes has been limited by the absence of behavioral measurement methods of self-referential and selfless processing of experience. Accordingly, the Single Experience & Self-Implicit Association Test (SES-IAT) was developed to behaviorally measure these processes. It involves the experimental elicitation of a subjective experience (e.g., elicitation of fear using videos and audio), while concurrently measuring the cognitive association between self and the elicited experience (e.g., fear) by means of a Single Category-Implicit Association Test. Based on this method, the fear SES-IAT was designed to measure self-referential and selfless processing of fear. Experimental and correlational findings indicate that the fear SES-IAT measures selfless processing of fear, identification with fear, and negative self-referential evaluation of fear. Importantly, findings also support the fear SES-IAT as a measure of key attitudinal qualities of mindfulness and of a metacognitive process subserving decentering (i.e. disidentification from internal experience). This chapter describes the theoretical foundations of the SES-IAT, findings supporting its reliability and validity, its methodology and score computation, and possible future directions for the SES-IAT
- …
