1,729,741 research outputs found
Yu. M. Lotman Forever Turned the Idea of the Text
No full textAn interview with O. A. Kling is presented, revealing the significance of Yu. M. Lotman’s works for literary criticism of the XX–XXI centuries. Oleg Alekseevich Kling is a Russian literary critic, Doctor of Philology, Professor, Head of the Department of Literary Theory of the Faculty of Philology of Lomonosov Moscow State University, winner of the magazine award “Questions of Literature”. The areas of scientific interests are Russian literature, the history of Russian literary studies, symbolism and post-symbolism, the Silver Age. He is the author of many works in these fields, including books: “Alexander Blok: The Structure of the Novel in Verse”, “Russian Poetry: The poem ‘Twelve’” (2004), “The Poetic World of Marina Tsvetaeva” (2004), “The Influence of Symbolism on Post-Symbolist Poetry in Russia of the 1910s: Problems of Poetics” (2010), “‘The Platinum Age’ in Russian Literature” (2017), editor-in-chief of the encyclopedia “Russian Literary Critics of the twentieth Century: BioBibliographic Dictionary. Vol. I: A–L” (2017)
Yu. M. Lotman and the Problems of Theoretical Literary Criticism
No full textIn the article, the author tries to assess the contribution of Yu. M. Lotman to the development of basic concepts of literary theory, which, along with the study of the problems of culture studies and the history of Russian literature, played an extremely important role in philological science. Among the large number of monographs and articles written by the scholar from Tartu, “Lectures on Structural Poetics” (1964) and “Culture and Explosion” (1992) stand out. According to the author of this article, it was in these works that the main break through took place, which put up an end to the rule of dogmatic literary criticism and opened up new opportunities in the field of philology. In particular, in the first book, the concept of structure as an epistemological category was postulated for the first time, in contrast to composition, which represents the material embodiment of the structure in text. In the last study, Lotman largely develops a number of new ideas, in which the text is understood as a field of relationships between systemic and non-systemic elements and suggests the possibility of various options for its development. In “Culture and Explosion”, the scholar presented a set of ideas that largely coincide with the thoughts of European poststructuralists, but differ in the interpretation of the main features of the literary process
Yu. M. Kobiščanov, Aksum
No full textCaquot André. Yu. M. Kobiščanov, Aksum. In: Annales d'Ethiopie. Volume 7, année 1967. pp. 159-160
Yu. M. Lotman and the Problems of Theoretical Literary Criticism
Full text linkВ статье рассматривается вклад Ю. М. Лотмана в развитие основных положений теории литературы, которые сыграли исключительно важную роль в филологической науке.In the article, the author tries to assess the contribution of Yu. M. Lotman to the development of basic concepts of literary theory, which, along with the study of the problems of culture studies and the history of Russian literature, played an extremely important role in philological science
Yu. M. Lotman and the Problems of Theoretical Literary Criticism
No full textВ статье рассматривается вклад Ю. М. Лотмана в развитие основных положений теории литературы, которые сыграли исключительно важную роль в филологической науке.In the article, the author tries to assess the contribution of Yu. M. Lotman to the development of basic concepts of literary theory, which, along with the study of the problems of culture studies and the history of Russian literature, played an extremely important role in philological science
“He Was the Only Professor for Us...”: Yu. M. Lotman – Teacher and Scholar
No full textThe article presents an interview of I. Z. Belobrovtseva, characterizing the personality of Yu. M. Lotman as well as the significance of his works for structural semiotics in literary criticism of the 20th century. Irina Zakharovna Belobrovtseva is an Estonian specialist in literary studies, Doctor of Philology, Professor of Russian Literature at the Institute for the Humanities of Tallinn University, Laureate of the Estonian State Prize in Science. Her research interests are Russian literature and culture of the 20th – 21st centuries, Estonian literature and culture, Russian literature of Estonia. She is author of the following books: “Over the Blank Page Alone and with Hope: Articles on Contemporary Estonian Literature” (1987), “Reading Poetry Together: A Guide for Teachers” (1994), “Mikhail Bulgakov’s Novel “Master and Margarita”: Constructive Principles of Text Organization” (1997), “Mikhail Bulgakov’s Novel “The Master and Margarita”. Commentary.” (co-authored with S. Kulyus, 2004, 2006, 2007), “The Image of a "Small Enemy": the Baltic States and Poland in the Mirror of Soviet Caricature (1918–1940)” (co-authored with D. Vseviov, A. Danilevsky, 2014), “Leonid Zurov. In the Shadow of Bunin” (2020) and others
Yu. M. Lotman and Contemporary Narratology
No full textThe paper reconstructs the influence of the semiotic studies of Yu. Lotman on the formation of the problems and the research apparatus of modern (“post-classical”) multimedia narratology, associated with the names of J. Genette, P. Ricoeur, W. Schmid and others. In particular, the author discusses the emergence of scientific interest in the film narrative, which has also had a significant impact on literary narratology, enriching it with the constructive concept of the “narrative image”. The article focuses on Lotman’s storytelling research, especially the concept of “plot-driven texts” of culture in their opposition to “plotless texts”. Particular importance is attached to the distinction between plot and myth, which continued O. M. Freidenberg’s investigations into the origin of narration. Lotman’s pioneering role in mastering the scientific categories of “narrative worldview” and “narrative event” is described. The author reveals the place of Lotman's research heritage in the comprehension of narrative practices as a tool for mental appropriation of life, accumulation and retranslation of event experience, as well as in the birth and development of the modern project of historical narratology
Yu. M. Smirnov's General Equivariant Shape Theory
Full text linkA general equivariant shape theory for arbitrary -spaces in the case of a
compact group is constructed by using the method of pseudometrics suggested
by Yu. M. Smirnov as early as in 1985 at the fifth Tiraspol symposium on
general topology and its applications.Comment: 6 page
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
