328,683 research outputs found
Supporting Information for chlorine heterogeneity in silicic magma
No full textThis is the dataset for H2O- and Cl-content profiles shown in Figs. 3c, 4e, 5g, and 10 of "Chlorine heterogeneity in volcanic glass as a faithful record of silicic magma degassing" by Yoshimura & Nakagawa (2021 JGR)
Strumigenys kumadori Yoshimura & Onoyama, 2007, sp. nov.
No full textStrumigenys kumadori sp. nov. [Japanese name: Kita-uroko-ari] Strumigenys sp. 1: Sonobe, 1977. Strumigenys sp.: Masuko et al., 1985: 11; Masuko, 1984. Strumigenys lewisi: Munakata, 1972 [we confirmed his misidentification]; Bolton, 2000 (in part) Strumigenys sp. 4: Onoyama et al., 1992; JADG, 2003 a, 2003 b, 2003 c. Worker (Figs 3 - 9). HL 0.67, HW 0.45, CI 67.7, ML 0.32, MI 48.5, SL 0.36, SI 80.5, DSA 3 L 0.15, DSA 3 W 0.19, DSA 3 I 127.3 (Holotype worker). HL 0.62 - 0.67, HW 0.44 - 0.47 CI 69.0 - 72.3, ML 0.30 - 0.32, MI 46.0 - 50.5, SL 0.36 - 0.39, SI 79.4 - 86.6, DSA 3 L 0.13 - 0.15, DSA 3 W 0.17 - 0.20, DSA 3 I 113.6 - 140.0 (6 measured). Ventrolateral margin of head at level of eye not extended outward. Antenna consisting of 6 segments. Fully closed mandible in full-face view curvilinear. On the mandible, a distinct, long and spiniform preapical tooth present close to apical teeth. Apical teeth consisting of two distinct spiniform teeth and three small intercalary teeth between them: basal one of the two spiniform teeth longer than the apical one: basal one of the three intercalary teeth distinctly smaller than apical two. With mesosoma in lateral view, the diameter of the excavated area of mesopleural gland moderate, much less than the maximum width of the first coxa. Mesosoma except for propodeal declivity without spongiform tissue. Propodeal declivity equipped with a broad and conspicuous lamella; propodeal tooth very feeble and not sclerotized; posterior margin of the lamella convex, and immediately under the propodeal tooth of the margin sometimes slightly concave. Ventral margin of petiole in lateral view with longitudinal spongiform tissue. With petiole in lateral view, anteriormost point of lateral spongiform lobe nearly reaches level of anterior face of node. Dorsal and lateral surfaces of pronotum entirely reticulate-punctate, sometimes with a small patch above the fore coxa. Metapleuron and side of propodeum entirely smooth. Limbus distinct. Abdominal tergite IV longitudinally sculptured at the basal portion, but not entirely covered. With head in full-face view, a pair of distinct long flagellate hairs present on apicoscrobe; posterior to the apicoscrobal hairs with laterally projecting distally plumose filiform hairs; anterior to the apicoscrobal hairs without laterally projecting hair. With head in lateral view, dorsal surface from level of eye to preoccipital margin with erect to reclinate ground-pilosity; hairs on preoccipital margin distinctly differentiated from those on level of eye; from highest point of vertex to preoccipital margin with the anteriorly directed ground-pilosity, which is very feebly curved basely so that each hair is elevated and inclined upward away from the cephalic outline. A pair of long, flagelliform hairs present on the pronotal humeri and mesonotum. Dorsum of hind femur without short erect hairs, but with two or three (usually two) long erect flagellate hairs. Dorsal surface of hind basitarsus with one freely projecting flagellate hair. The whole of the dorsal surface of abdominal tergite IV with long filiform hairs. Basal portion of abdominal sternite IV covered with matted hair-like tissue. Body almost unicolorous, reddish brown to yellowish brown. Queen (Figs 17 - 22, 41). HL 0.65 - 0.67, HW 0.47 - 0.50 CI 72.4 - 76.1, ML 0.29 - 0.33, MI 45.3 - 48.8, SL 0.36 - 0.38, SI 74.0 - 78.0, DlO 0.04, DlOI 7.49 - 8.79, EL 0.12 - 0.14, EI 25.7 - 29.1, HD 0.32 - 0.34, PrH 0.21 - 0.25, MsW 0.33 - 0.36, MsWI 66.8 - 75.6, MsH 0.12 - 0.15, MsHI 25.1 - 29.8, DSA 3 L 0.13 - 0.16, DSA 3 W 0.22 - 0.23, DSA 3 I 135.8 - 169.1 (9 measured). Generally similar to the worker with the usual caste differences. Head thicker than that of queen of S. lewisi in lateral view. With head in full-face view, the ocelli distinctly developed, situated at posterior 1 / 4 of the head. Eye relatively large. A distinct, long and spiniform preapical tooth present close to apical teeth. Apical teeth consisting of two spiniform teeth and three small intercalary teeth between them: basal one of the two spiniform teeth longer than another apical one: basal one of the three intercalary teeth distinctly smaller than the apical two. With mesosoma in lateral view, the highest point of the mesoscutum nearly situated on extension line of the mesopleural wing process; mesopleural gland orifice distinct, but its maximum width not reaching maximum width of the procoxa; the pits on the mesepisternum invisible. Metanotum in lateral view slightly convex posteriorly. Propodeal spine developed and sclerotized, and under which the lobe of spongiform tissue distinctly developed. With the spongiform tissue on propodeal declivity in lateral view, its posterior margin concave under the propodeal spine, and the remaining convex posteriorly. With mesoscutum in dorsal view, its anterior margin rounded, both lateral margins weakly constricted at posterior 1 / 3, lateral corners by the constriction not strongly angular. Transverse furrow on the mesoscutum weakly curved posteriorly. Mesoscutum wide (MsWI more than 63), its width exceeding 3 / 4 of the head width in frontal view. With petiole in lateral view, the lobe of spongiform tissue strongly developed. Most of veins on both of the fore and hind wings absent or vestigial. Only costal (C) and radial (R 1) veins and r-rs cross vein clearly present on fore wing. Vestiges of the radial sector (Rs), M + Cu, and cubital (Cu) veins sometimes visible as pigmented lines but not sclerotized. On the hind wing, radial (R) vein present, but not reaching to costal margin; jugal lobe absent. Head and mesosomal dorsum entirely reticulopunctate. Central part of mesepisternum and most part of propodeum ventral to propodeal spiracle not punctate and smooth. Dorsal margin of petiole reticulate- punctate. Dorsal surface of postpetiole not punctate and smooth. Limbs present on abdominal tergite IV. Abdominal tergite IV longitudinally sculptured at the basal portion, but sculpture not extended to posterior half. Pairs of hairs on the pronotal humeri long and flagellate. Mesonotal dorsum with erect, and straight or flagellate hairs. Dorsum of hind femur without short erect hairs, but with two or three (usually two) long erect flagellate hairs. Dorsal surface of abdominal tergite IV with long filiform hairs. Hair-like tissue on the basal portion of abdominal sternite IV dense. Fore and hind wings densely hairy. Body almost unicolorous, reddish brown to yellowish brown. Outer margins of ocelli distinctly bordered by brown to black pigment on inside portions among the three. Male (Figs 29 - 34, 42, 45 - 48). HL 0.46 - 0.48, HW 0.42 - 0.44, CI 87.3 - 95.6, SL 0.09 - 0.11, SI 21.9 - 24.9, DlO 0.05 - 0.07, EL 0.19 - 0.20, HD 0.34 - 0.36, PrH 0.23 - 0.26, MsW 0.40 - 0.43, MsWI 90.8 - 103.2, MsH 0.13 - 0.15, MsHI 30.7 - 35.4 (6 measured). With head in full-face view, portion posterior to the eyes subglobose; anterior to the eyes distinctly narrowed anteriorly. Ocelli distinct; the median ocellus situated about posterior 1 / 4 of the head length, the lateral ocelli not reaching to the posterior border of the head. Eyes distinctly developed and prominent, occupying central 1 / 3 of lateral margin of the head in full-face view. Eye in lateral view broadened ventrally, and its outer margin expanded anteroventrally and flattened posteriorly. Anterior tentorial pits indistinct. Anterior margin of the clypeus in full-face view slightly convex, but nearly straight. Frontal carinae undeveloped and antennal insertions exposed. Antennae long and filiform, consisting 13 segments. Scape short and broad. Pedicel short and broadened apically. With mandible in full-face view, its apical portion abruptly curved and narrowed; the basal lamella recognizable but very weakly projected; apical to the lamella edentate. Mandible in lateral view very narrowly subtriangular. With labrum in full-face view; its apical portion distinctly extended laterally; the distal lobes entirely reduced, and apical margin of the labrum concave toward the midpoint. Palp formula 1, 1 (1 observed on SEM). Mesosoma in lateral view shorter and higher than that of the queen. Mesoscutum distinctly developed and strongly raised dorsally in lateral view. Mesoscutellum developed and extended posteriorly. With the mesonotum in dorsal view, the median notal suture weakly impressed but mostly invisible; the notauli weakly impressed; the parapsidal furrows distinctly impressed and continued to the distinct transscutal suture, so that the axillae distinctly divided; anterior margin of the scuto-scutellar suture distinctly sculptured longitudinally. With mesopleuron in lateral view, its anteroventral margin distinctly more expanded than that of queen. Metanotum in lateral view slightly extended posteriorly. With the propodeum in lateral view, a distinct spiracle situated at the midheight; the posterior margin with distinct corner, but the spine or dent reduced; the lamella absent ventral to the propodeal corner, even if its ventral portion with a carina along the propodeal declivity. With the petiole in lateral view, the node more gently raised than that of worker and queen; the lateral spongiform lobe entirely reduced; the longitudinal spongiform tissue feebly present. Ventral surface of abdominal sternite III in lateral view usually with a distinct process and a weak lamella, but rarely the process reduced. Abdominal segment IV in lateral view thicker than that of worker and queen, the ventral expansion more gentle. With genitalia in ventral view, the basal ring broader than long; lateral margins of the parameral plate weakly concave; the cuspis of volsella distinctly shorter than the digitus. With genitalia in lateral view, an anteriorly-directed process, such as the barb, present at apical 1 / 4 of its ventral margin; the digitus of volsella gradually curved ventrally and not broadened at the corner. Fore and hind wings similar to those of queen. Head, pronotum, mesonotum, and metanotum entirely reticulate-punctate. Central part of mesepisternum and most part of propodeum ventral to propodeal spiracle not punctate and smooth. Dorsal margin of petiole reticulate-punctate. Dorsal surface of postpetiole not punctate and smooth. Limbus absent. Two pairs of standing filiform hairs present on the vertex. With head in lateral view, long and frontally projecting hairs absent anterior to median ocellus. Mesonotum with long, erect, and filiform to flagellar hairs. Dorsal surface of the petiole, abdominal tergite III and IV with sparse filiform hairs. Body almost unicolorous, blackish brown to reddish brown, legs same or lighter. Type material. Holotype worker, Japan: Gozenyama,Ibaraki Pref., 11. viii. 2002, M. Yoshimura leg., specimen code [649 - 1]. (Type No. [OMNH TI 196], Osaka Museum of Natural History). Paratypes. colony code [649] in Yoshimura collection: 1 alate queen, 4 dealate queens, 37 workers, 2 males, same data as holotype. Distribution. Japan: southern Hokkaido, Honshu, Kyushu; China: Peking; Korea; Taiwan [We could not examine specimens collected from Korea; specimens collected in Peking (workers, ix. 1980, P. Hammond) and Taiwan (worker, Chuchin, Taipai, Taiwan, 13. vi. 1992, C. C. Lin) were examined]. Etymology. The species is named from the Japanese “ Kumadori ”, a traditional make-up for the Kabuki actor.Published as part of Yoshimura, M. & Onoyama, K., 2007, A new sibling species of the genus Strumigenys, with a redefinition of S. lewisi Cameron., pp. 664-690 in Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 80 on pages 668-67
Probolomyrmex maryatiae Eguchi, Yoshimura & Yamane, 2006, sp. nov.
No full textProbolomyrmex maryatiae sp. nov. (Figs. 5A-D, 9E, 10E) Holotype: worker belonging to colony Eg97-BOR-587, Gunong Rara, Sabah, Malaysia, 25/ii/1997, Eg (ITBC).Paratypes: 4 workers from the same colony to which the holotype belongs (MCZC, MHNG, ACEG, SKYC). Nontype material examined. MALAYSIA: Sabah: Sepilok Forest [general coll.: SKY27/viii/1995]; Sarawak: Tower Region, Lambir N. P., Miri [general coll.: SKY, 15/i/1993, 1/iii/1997]. Eguchi's informal species code " Probolomyrmex sp. eg-4" applies to this species. Worker. HL, 0.54-0.58 mm; HW, 0.35-0.36 mm; SL, 0.33-0.37 mm; CI, 60-67; SI, 92-106; WL, 0.75-0.84 mm; PW, 0.26-0.29 mm; DPtW, 0.16-0.19 mm; DPtI, 61-66; PtH, 0.26-0.29 mm; PtNL, 0.25-0.29 mm; LPtI, 96-104 (N=5). Body ferruginous brown. Head in full-face view with weakly convex sides and very shallowly concave occipital border. Eye absent. Antenna relatively short; relative lengths of antennal segments II-XII as seen in Fig. 10E; antennal segment III shorter than IV. Dorsal outline of mesosoma almost straight; posterior margin of propodeal dorsum in dorsal view strongly concave; posterior face of propodeum margined laterally with a well-developed translucent lamella which in profile forming an obtuse angle in upper portion. Petiole including subpetiolar process as long as or a little longer than high, in profile with relatively gentle anterior slope and (weakly) concave posterior outline (above the articulation with gaster); posterodorsal margin of petiolar node in dorsal view weakly and broadly concave; subpetiolar process developed, with conspicuous anteroventral and posteroventral projections; the anteroventral projections relatively thick and not translucent. Abdominal segment III (gastral segment I) in profile relatively short, relatively gently narrowed anteriad in the anterior 3/4; abdominal sternum III weakly convex behind the midlength. Recognition. Four Oriental and Australian species are morphologically very similar to each other: this species, P. greavesi Taylor, P. salomonis Taylor, and P. vieti sp. nov. The difference between this species and P. vieti is given in the key. It is separated from P. greavesi as follows: in the worker the petiole in profile has a relatively steep anterior slope and straight posterior outline (above the articulation with gaster). Probolomyrmex maryatiae is barely separated from P. salomonis (holotype worker deposited in MCZC was examined) as follows: in the worker of the former the anterior portion of the subpetiolar process projects strongly and the posterodorsal margin of the petiolar node is relatively broadly concave. In contrast, in the worker of P. salomonis the anteroventral portion of the subpetiolar process forms a round corner and the posterodorsal margin of the petiolar node is relatively narrowly concave. Distribution. Known only from Borneo.Published as part of Eguchi, K., Yoshimura, M. & Yamane, S., 2006, The Oriental species of the ant genus Probolomyrmex (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Proceratiinae)., pp. 1-35 in Zootaxa 1376 on pages 26-2
Supplemental Material, MTX_Table#6-S - Modulation of methotrexate-induced intestinal mucosal injury by dietary factors
No full textSupplemental Material, MTX_Table#6-S for Modulation of methotrexate-induced intestinal mucosal injury by dietary factors by T Higuchi, M Yoshimura, S Oka, K Tanaka, T Naito, S Yuhara, E Warabi, S Mizuno, M Ono, S Takahashi, S Tohma, N Tsuchiya and H Furukawa in Human & Experimental Toxicology</p
Data for: Relationship between auditory pathway fractional anisotropy and audibility in patients with cerebellopontine angle tumors on diffusion tensor imaging
No full textData for tables 1 and 2, figures 2 to
Supplemental Material, MTX_Fig#6-S - Modulation of methotrexate-induced intestinal mucosal injury by dietary factors
No full textSupplemental Material, MTX_Fig#6-S for Modulation of methotrexate-induced intestinal mucosal injury by dietary factors by T Higuchi, M Yoshimura, S Oka, K Tanaka, T Naito, S Yuhara, E Warabi, S Mizuno, M Ono, S Takahashi, S Tohma, N Tsuchiya and H Furukawa in Human & Experimental Toxicology</p
Diffusive author(s), cohesive author: Analysis of S/N (1994)
No full textThis study indicates the ways in which various aspects of the author(s) are brought forth in Dumb type’s performance art, the S/N production. Previous research has suggested a non-hierarchical organization of Dumb type and the absence of a “privileged author” in Dumb type’s collaborative work, S/N. However, the results that I have investigated from member’s interviews on the creative process of S/N along with my analysis of the recorded images of S/N, indicate a different aspect of the author(s). First, S/N was created through, so to speak, the collective ideas of the members of Dumb type. Further, S/N has at least nine quotations from previous performances, installations, and printed writings, besides the work-in-progress technique. Explicating one of the “author functions” as given by Michel Foucault, each text has plural subjects of the author. However, it has been revealed from members’ interviews that Teiji Furuhashi had a decision-making role in selecting the members’ ideas within the performance. Since then, S/N has had plural subjects of creation; however, Furuhashi is one of the subjects of creation along with the “privileged author.” S/N has plural authors (diffusive authors) yet at the same time, it has a “privileged author,” Teiji Furuhashi (cohesive author)
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Probolomyrmex vieti Eguchi, Yoshimura & Yamane, 2006, sp. nov.
No full textProbolomyrmex vieti sp. nov. (Figs. 7A-F, 9G, 10G, 14A-F, 15G, H, 16J-L) Probolomyrmex sp. 1: Ito et al., 2001: 403 (species list). Holotype: worker belonging to colony Eg04-VN-783, South Cat Tien N. P. (behind the headquarters, <160 m alt.), Dong Nai, S. Vietnam, 23/x/2004, Eg (IEBR).Paratypes: 7 workers from the same colony to which the holotype belongs (MCZC, MHNG, ACEG, SKYC). Nontype material examined. THAILAND: Nakhonratchasima: Khao Yai N. P. [general coll.: SKY, 29/v/2000]; INDONESIA: W. Java: Kebun Raya, Bogor [general coll.: FI, i/1993 (including male); colony: FI92-305 (including queen), FI93-60 (including queen)]. Eguchi's informal species code " Probolomyrmex sp. eg-2" and Yamane's " Probolomyrmex sp. 3" apply to this species. Worker. HL, 0.51-0.57 mm; HW, 0.33-0.35 mm; SL, 0.29-0.35 mm; CI, 61-65; SI, 88-100; WL, 0.69-0.79 mm; PW, 0.25-0.28 mm; DPtW, 0.16 mm; DPtI, 57-64; PtH, 0.25-0.27 mm; PtNL, 0.21-0.25 mm; LPtI, 78-100 (N=5). Body ferruginous brown. Head in full-face view with weakly convex sides and very shallowly concave occipital border. Eye absent. Antenna relatively short; relative lengths of antennal segments II-XII as in Fig. 10G; segment III shorter than IV. Dorsal outline of mesosoma straight; posterior margin of dorsum of propodeum in dorsal view moderately concave; posterior face of propodeum margined laterally with a well-developed translucent lamella which in profile is weakly produced posteriad but not forming a conspicuous propodeal spine. Petiole including subpetiolar process a little higher than long, in profile with relatively steep anterior slope and straight posterior outline (above the articulation with gaster); posterodorsal margin of petiolar node in dorsal view almost straight (very weakly concave medially in a specimen from Thailand); subpetiolar process developed; its anteroventral portion with a translucent projection/lobe which extends anteroventrad and often with a narrow apex; posteroventral portion of subpetiolar process forming an angle. Abdominal segment III (gastral segment I) in profile relatively short, gently narrowed anteriad in the anterior 2/3; abdominal sternum III weakly (in the type series) or very weakly (in the worker from Indonesia) convex behind the midlength. Queen (based on nontype dealate and teneral alate queens). HL, 0.51 mm; HW, 0.35 mm; SL, 0.30 mm; EL, 0.09 mm; CI, 69; SI, 86; EI, 26; WL, 0.74 mm; PW, 0.27 mm; DPtW, 0.16 mm; DPtI, 59; PtH, 0.26 mm; PtNL, 0.20 mm; LPtI, 77 (N=1). Body ferruginous brown. Head in full-face view elongate, with very weakly convex sides and almost straight or very weakly concave occipital border. Eye shorter than the width of apical antennal segment. Antenna relatively short; scape when laid backward at most reaching the level of anterior margin of median ocellus; relative lengths of antennal segments II-XII as in the worker (see Fig. 10G); segment III shorter than IV. Pronotum large; mesoscutum ca. 1.25-1.35 times as long as broad, in profile very weakly convex; notauli absent; parapsidal lines very fine; scuto-scutellar suture fine, very weakly and roundly curved posteriad; scutellum in profile with relatively gentle posterior slope; axilla poorly separated from scutellum by an obscure impression but not by suture; mesopleuron fully divided by a suture into anepisternum and katepisternum (but suture sometimes absent in its posteriormost part); median portion of metanotum abruptly raised with the dorsum small in size and almost rectangular in shape; suture between metepisternum and propodeum absent; a weak depression present dividing metepisternum into anepisternum and katepisternum; orifice of metapleural gland small, opening posterolaterad; posterior margin of propodeal dorsum in dorsal view moderately and broadly concave; posterior face of propodeum margined laterally with a well-developed translucent lamella which in profile is weakly produced posteriad but not forming a conspicuous propodeal spine in upper portion. Petiole including subpetiolar process a little higher than long, in profile with relatively steep anterior slope and straight posterior outline (above the articulation with gaster); posterodorsal margin of petiolar node in dorsal view almost straight; subpetiolar process developed; the anteroventral portion of the process more or less projecting or at least forming a round corner, and the posteroventral portion forming an angle; ventral edge of the process thin. Abdominal segment III (gastral segment I) in profile short, gently narrowed anteriad in the anterior 2/3; abdominal sternum III very weakly convex behind the midlength. Wing structure and venation as in the male. Hind wing with three hamuli. Male. HL, 0.39-0.41 mm; HW, 0.43-0.45 mm; CI, 110; HD, 0.34 mm; HDI, 83-87; EL, 0.20 mm; SL, 0.24 mm; SI, 53-56; MstlL, 0.16 mm; MstlW, 0.16 mm; MstlI, 100; WL, 0.75 mm; PtNL, 0.16-0.18 mm; PtH, 0.17-0.18 mm; LPtI, 94-100 (N=2, but N=1 for WL). Head in lateral view relatively thin (HDI<90); protrusion of the frontoclypeal region relatively short so that antennal insertion is situated on apical portion of its dorsal surface. Frontal carina high, distinctly exceeding posterior margin of antennal insertions in fullface view. Eye moderately widened ventrally. Antennal flagellum relatively short, slightly widened apically; antennal segment III shorter than segment II; segment XI (the third from apex) broader than long; ventrolateral surface of the apical segment widely and strongly concave. Mandible elongate-triangular, with two small dents and a single strong apical tooth on its masticatory margin; the basal angle distinct. Palpal formula: maxillary 4, labial 2; maxillary palp relatively short; the third palpomere short, slightly longer than the second, and the apical distinctly longer than the third. Pronotum in profile slightly higher than mesoscutum; metanotum moderately produced posteriorly, and a suture separating it from mesoscutellum strongly notched; anepisternum of metapleuron separated from metakatepisternum and propodeum by a deep furrow; metakatepisternum clearly separated from propodeum; dorsal margin of propodeum rounded, not forming a distinct angle with the posterior slope. With the mesosoma in dorsal view, mesonotum lacking notauli; parapsidal lines distinct; axillae distinct; mesoscutellum longer than broad; declivitous face of propodeum not concave, edged laterally with weak sculpture. Petiole in lateral view with a short peduncle differentiated from node; node distinctly shortened, with steep anterior slope and gentle posterior slope; posterodorsal margin rounded; subpetiolar process broadly developed and its apex blunt. Abdominal sternum IX short; its apical margin transversely flat, not pointed medially. Genitalia not retractile. With the phallus in lateral view, the basal ring moderately long and its dorsal margin nearly straight; basiparamere with the dorsal margin suddenly raised in its basal portion, and posterodorsal slope gentle; digitus volsellaris simply curved ventrally in its apical portion; cuspis volsellaris broadly developed; penis valve wide and nearly straight, and its apical portion blunt. Paramere thin; its expanded inner faces directed ventrally, with its apical portion not curved. On fore wing, costa and radius apical to stigma vestigial; Rsf2 and Rsf3 completely absent; radial sector never reaching costal margin; Mf1, Rs+M and media apical to Rs+M completely absent; cu-a cross vein absent. On hind wing, Rsf4+5 vestigial; jugal lobe absent. Recognition. In the worker, this species is barely separated from P. greavesi Taylor described from Capital Territory and S. Queensland, Australia (1 paratype worker and 1 paratype queen deposited in MCZC were examined), but the anteroventral portion of subpetiolar process projects anteroventrad in the worker of P. vieti. In the male, this species is rather clearly separated from P. greavesi by 1) masticatory margin of mandible with two teeth in addition to apical tooth, 2) dorsal margin of the node that is declining posteriorly and clearly divided from anterior and posterior faces, and 3) a broad and strong ventrolateral concavity on the apical segment of antenna. Distribution. Known from the Indo-Chinese Peninsula and Java.Published as part of Eguchi, K., Yoshimura, M. & Yamane, S., 2006, The Oriental species of the ant genus Probolomyrmex (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Proceratiinae)., pp. 1-35 in Zootaxa 1376 on pages 29-3
Supporting Information for chlorine heterogeneity in silicic magma
No full textThis is the dataset for H2O- and Cl-content profiles shown in Figs. 3c, 4e, 5g, and 10 of "Chlorine heterogeneity in volcanic glass as a faithful record of silicic magma degassing" by Yoshimura & Nakagawa (2021 JGR)
- …
