1,721,011 research outputs found
راپۆرتی بیکەر-هامیلتۆن: سیاسەتی ئەمریکا بە بنبەست گەیشتووە یا پڕۆژەی "عێراقی دیمۆکراتی و فیدڕاڵی"؟
عێراقی دوای سەددام و چارەنووسی باشووری کوردستان
This book is an anthology of a number of inquiries regarding Iraq after the fall of the Baath regime in Iraq in 2003, written by the author. There are a range of themes been discussed in the book, the Kurds in Iraq at crossroads, the process of rebuilding the state of Iraq, the US foreign policy and the case of Iraq, regional power and the rebuilding of Iraq, Turkey’s policies vis a vis Iraq and the Kurdish administration in that country, … etc. There are also a number of interviews conducted with the author, republished in this anthology
Iraq After Saddam Hussein and the Future of Southern Kurdistan, Duhok [Elektronisk resurs] : Hawar, 2008
This book is an anthology of a number of inquiries regarding Iraq after the fall of the Baath regime in Iraq in 2003, written by the author. There are a range of themes been discussed in the book, the Kurds in Iraq at crossroads, the process of rebuilding the state of Iraq, the US foreign policy and the case of Iraq, regional power and the rebuilding of Iraq, Turkey’s policies vis a vis Iraq and the Kurdish administration in that country, … etc. There are also a number of interviews conducted with the author, republished in this anthology
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
دوڕیان و بڕیار : چەند سەرنجێک لەسەر پێدراوە سیاسییەکانی باشووری کوردستان لە پۆست-شکستدا
The article deals with the tensions and conflicts between the local regional Kurdish government of Iraqi Kurdistan and the ways the difficulties and tensions coped with
- …
