186,608 research outputs found

    Josef Pieper y Peter Wust

    No full text
    Nos proponemos estudiar los vínculos biográficos y filosóficos entre ambos autores, ubicándolos en el marco histórico del pensamiento católico entre las dos guerras mundiales del cual fueron protagonistas destacados. Pieper habla de Wust en su Autobiografía' aunque no se refiere a él en su Autopresentación2Wust no menciona a Pieper en su ensayo autobiográfico' pero tenemos referencias importantes que nos permitirán describir un vínculo personal y filosófico. Por su especial importancia nos detendremos en el encuentro de Guardini y Scheler para mirar desde allí en adelante. Tuvo lugar en la casa de la familia Landsberg en Bonn a comienzos del'23. Scheler le aconseja a Guardini no tomar ningún tema sistemático sino observar al mundo, las cosas, los hombres, las novelas de Dostoievski, p. ej., desde el punto de vista cristiano. Esta conversación, llena de consecuencias para Guardini, fue agradecida como el único consejo verdaderamente importante para él. De manera que no puede sobreestimarse la figura de Scheler cuando se considera la obra de Guardini. Si bien Guardini y Pieper se conocieron en 1920, el famoso discurso en Rothenfels tuvo lugar en agosto de 19244, es decir, con posterioridad y hasta quizás como ulterioridad de aquel inolvidable consejo'. Por la misma época —a partir de 1922 y hasta el '24— Scheler se reunía semanalmente con P. Wust y otros en un pequeño círculo que Wust compara con lo que habría sido la Academia de Platón en Atenas..

    Peter Wust, Incertitude et risque, trad, par Geneviève du Loup. Collection : « Etre et Pensée ». Neuchâtel, La Baconnière, 1957

    No full text
    Burgelin Pierre. Peter Wust, Incertitude et risque, trad, par Geneviève du Loup. Collection : « Etre et Pensée ». Neuchâtel, La Baconnière, 1957. In: Revue d'histoire et de philosophie religieuses, 38e année n°2,1958. Hommage au Doyen Charles Hauter à l'occasion de son 70e anniversaire. 9 juillet 1958. p. 196

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    No full text
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    No full text
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Withdrawn by Author

    No full text
    <p>Withdrawn by Author </p&gt

    ADVENTSKO PISMO P. WUSTA

    No full text
    Wust je neumorno istraživao kakvu ulogu igra vjera u ovom egzistencijalnom mišljenju

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    No full text
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore