1,721,015 research outputs found
Risk management and treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer
Full text linkContains fulltext :
141384.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, 30 juni 2015Promotor : Witjes, J.A. Co-promotor : Witjes, W.P.J
Micturition variables in the assessment and treatment of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms
No full textRe: DNA-repair Defects and Olaparib in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
No full textContains fulltext :
171343.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access
Mictievariabelen bij de diagnostiek en de behandeling ban patienten met lagere urinewegsymptomen
No full textItem does not contain fulltex
Lagere-urinewegsymptomen bij de oudere man
Full text linkContains fulltext :
26181___.PDF (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access
Micturition varibles in the assessment and treatment of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms
No full textItem does not contain fulltextKUN, 21 mei 1997Promotor : Debruyne, F.M.J. Co-promotor : Rosette, J.J.M.H.C. de la251 p
Micturition variables in the assessment and treatment of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms
Full text linkContains fulltext :
mmubn000001_242751202.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)Promotores : F. Debruyne en J. de la Rosette251 p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
