1,721,009 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Reliability of the European pressure ulcer advisory panel classification system
No full textAim. This paper reports a study examining the interrater and intrarater reliability ofclassifying pressure ulcers according to the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panelclassification system when using photographs of pressure ulcers and incontinencelesions.Background. Pressure ulcer classification is an essential tool for assessing ulcers andtheir severity and determining which preventive or therapeutic action is needed.Many classification systems are described in the literature. There are only a limitednumber of studies that evaluate the interrater reliability of pressure ulcer gradingscales. The intrarater reliability is seldom studied.Methods. The study consisted of two phases. In the first phase 56 photographs,together with a random selection of nine photographs from the same set, were presentedto 473 nurses. In the second phase, the 56 photographs were presented twiceto 86 other nurses with an interval of one month and in a different order. All thenurses were familiar with the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel classification.They did not receive any additional training on classification, and were asked toclassify the lesions as normal skin, blanchable erythema, pressure ulcers (four grades,European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel classification) or incontinence lesions.Results. In the first phase, the multirater-Kappa for the 473 participating nurses was0.37 (P < 0.001). Non-blanchable erythema was often confused with blanchableerythema and incontinence lesions. Also incontinence lesions were frequently notcorrectly classified. The intrarater agreement was low (k = 0.38). In the secondphase, the interrater agreement was not significantly different in both sessions. Theintrarater agreement was 0.52.Conclusion. Both the interrater and intrarater reliability of the European PressureUlcer Advisory Panel classification of lesion photographs by nurses was very low.Differentiation between pressure ulcers and incontinence lesions seems to be difficul
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
De fabricage van hydrazine hydraat
No full textDocument(en) uit de collectie Chemische ProcestechnologieDelftChemTechApplied Science
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
