1,720,957 research outputs found
PENGARUH PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT DAN TRANSPARANSI KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK TERHADAP HUBUNGAN ANTARA PENGETAHUAN DEWAN TENTANG ANGGARAN DENGAN PENGAWASAN KEUANGAN DAERAH (APBD) (STUDY EMPIRIS DI PROVINSI PAPUA)
The purpose of this study examined influence of public participation and public policy transparancy on the relationship between budgeting knowledge council and budgeting control (APBD), which moderating by public participation and public policy transparancy . Independent variable are budgeting knowledge council and dependent variable are local financial control (APBD). The sample of study are legislative assembly at regency (DPRD) in period of 1999-2009 from all the Provinci of Papua. The data obtained by using Purpose Random Sampling methode and respondent in this research are 313. Collecting data by direct survey at the area of attainable, mail survei and contanck person for area of unattainable. Hyphothesis are tested empirically used multiple regression for each sample. The result of the study indicated that’s, first, budgeting knowledge council are statics significant on local financial (APBD), with p value = 0.018, second, interaction of public participation are negative significant on the relationship between budgeting knowledge council and local financial (APBD) with p value = 0,03 and coeficien regression are = -2,403, third, interaction from transparency of public policy are not statics significant between budgeting knowledge council and local financial (APBD) with p value = 0,266, fourth, interaction of budgeting knowledge council, public participation, transparency of public policy are not statics significant on local financial (APBD), with p value = 0,266.Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menguji pengaruh partisipasi masyarakat dan transparansi kebijakan publik terhadap hubungan antara pengetahuan Dewan tentang anggaran dengan pengawasan keuangan daerah (APBD), yang di moderasikan oleh Partisipasi masyarakat dan transparansi kebijakan publik. Variabel independen dalam penelitian ini adalah pengetahuan Dewan tentang anggaran dan variable dependennya adalah pengawasan keuangan daerah (APBD). Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah (DPRD) se-Provinsi Papua peroide 1999-2009, diperoleh dengan menggunakan tekhnik Purpose Random Sampling. Jumlah Responden dalam penelitian ini adalah sebanyak 313. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan cara survei langsung pada wilayah yang dapat dijangkau dan mail survei serta kontak person secara khusus pada wilayah tidak dapat dijangkau. Pengujian hipotesis diuji secara empiris dengan menggunakan multiple regression untuk masing-masing sample. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertama, terdapat hubungan yang positif signifikan antara variabel pengetahuan dengan pengawasan keuangan daerah (APBD) pada level (p value) 0.018. Kedua interaksi antara pengetahuan dewan tentang anggaran dengan partisipasi masyarakat berpengaruh negatif signifikan terhadap pengawasan Keuangan Daerah (APBD) dengan melihat nilai signifikansinya (p value) sebesar = 0,03 dengan koefisien regresinya bernilai -2,403, ketiga interaksi antara pengetahuan dewan tentang anggaran dengan transparansi kebijakan publik tidak berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap pengawasan APBD dengan melihat nilai signifikansinya (p value) sebesar = 0,266, ke empat interaksi antara pengetahuan dewan tentang anggaran dengan partisipasi masyarakat dan transparansi kebijakan publik tidak berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap pengawasan APBD dengan melihat nilai signifikansinya (p value) sebesar = 0,266
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
PENGARUH KUALITAS SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA, REGULASI, DAN PERENCANAAN ANGGARAN TERHADAP PENYERAPAN ANGGARAN PADA ORGANISASI PERANGKAT DAERAH PROVINSI PAPUA BARAT
The research aimed to examine and analyze the effects of the quality of human resources, eulation, and budget planning on the budget absorption in Regional Apparatus Organization of West Papua Province. This research was conduced by partially analyzing the quality of human resources, regulation, and budget planning on budget absorption. In this research used primary data and secondary data. The method of the data collection was the survey using the questionnaires distributed to the respondents. The data were then analyzed using the multiple Regression Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS).The research results indicated that the quality of human resources had an effects on the budget absorption variable of 0,379 or 37,9%. The regulation had a partial effect on budget absorption variable of 0,371 or 37,1%. Budget planning had a partial effect on budget absorption variable of 0,439 or 43,9%.  Â
PENGARUH PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT DAN TRANSPARANSI KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK TERHADAP HUBUNGAN ANTARA PENGETAHUAN DEWAN TENTANG ANGGARAN DENGAN PENGAWASAN KEUANGAN DAERAH (APBD) (Study Empiris Di Provinsi Papua)
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menguji pengaruh partisipasi masyarakat dan transparansi kebijakan publik terhadap hubungan antara pengetahuan Dewan tentang anggaran dengan pengawasan keuangan daerah (APBD), yang di moderasi oleh Partisipasi masyarakat dan transparansi kebijakan publik. Variabel independen dalam penelitian ini adalah pengetahuan Dewan tentang anggaran dan variable dependennya adalah pengawasan keuangan daerah (APBD).
Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah (DPRD) se-Provinsi Papua peroide 1999-2009, diperoleh dengan menggunakan tekhnik Purpose Random Sampling. Jumlah Responden dalam penelitian ini adalah sebanyak 313. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan cara survei langsung pada wilayah yang dapat dijangkau dan mail survei serta kontak person secara khusus pada wilayah tidak dapat dijangkau. Pengujian hipotesis diuji secara empiris dengan menggunakan multiple regression untuk masing-masing sample. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertama, terdapat hubungan yang positif signifikan antara variabel pengetahuan dengan pengawasan keuangan daerah (APBD) pada level (p value) 0.018. Kedua interaksi antara pengetahuan dewan tentang anggaran dengan partisipasi masyarakat berpengaruh negatif signifikan terhadap pengawasan Keuangan Daerah (APBD) dengan melihat nilai signifikansinya (p value) sebesar = 0,03 dengan koefisien regresinya bernilai -2,403, ketiga interaksi antara pengetahuan dewan tentang anggaran dengan transparansi kebijakan publik tidak berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap pengawasan APBD dengan melihat nilai signifikansinya (p value) sebesar = 0,266, ke empat interaksi antara pengetahuan dewan tentang anggaran dengan partisipasi masyarakat dan transparansi kebijakan publik tidak berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap pengawasan APBD dengan melihat nilai signifikansinya (p value) sebesar = 0,266.
Kata Kunci : Partisipasi masyarakat, Transparansi kebijakan publik, pengetahuan anggaran, pengawasan keuangan daerah (APBD)
REFOCUSING, RELOKASIANGGARAN DAN PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN APBD DALAM MASA PANDEMI COVID-19 DI PROVINSI PAPUA BARAT TAHUN 2020
Sugiyono, 2021. Refocusing, Budget Reallocation and Accountability of the Regional Budget during the 2020 West Papua Covid-19 Pandemic, supervised by Mr. Adolf Z. D. Siahay, as Advisor I and Mr. Samson Werimon, as Advisor II. The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of refocusing, budget relocation and budget accountability during the 2020 West Papua Covid-19 pandemic.This type of research is qualified as descriptive qualitative research with data collection techniques obtained through observation, interviews, documentation and internet access. Primary data in this study were interviews with the Head of BPK Representative for West Papua Province and Head of BPKAD for West Papua Province and secondary data was obtained from Financial Audit Reports by BPK in 2019 and 2020.The results of the study prove that the Covid-19 Pandemic has a very wide impact both in terms of government, politics, and the economy as well as society, including the drastic decline in the performance of APBD management. The 2020 Covid-19 Fund Allocation was Rp. 779,114,469,608.75, with an absorption value of 36.56%. The Weakness of the 2019 APBD Management was 0.028% while the 2020 APBD management performance decreased by 0.390%. The percentage of the Covid-19 budget management performance value in 2020 was found to be lower by 11.81% or the management was less than optimal
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
