124,929 research outputs found
Repeat Repeat. (CTG)n expansion and myogenesis in DM1
No full textContains fulltext :
213671.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)Radboud University, 07 januari 2020Promotor : Wieringa, B. Co-promotor : Wansink, D.G
Expression and fate of normal and expanded transcripts of the myotonic dystrophy type 1 locus
No full textContains fulltext :
178285.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)Radboud University, 08 november 2017Promotor : Wieringa, B. Co-promotor : Wansink, D.G
Molecular aspects of myotonic dystrophy type 1, expression and silencing of DMPK gene products.
No full textContains fulltext :
91254.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, 13 mei 2011Promotor : Wieringa, B. Co-promotor : Wansink, D.G.191 p
Myotronic Dystrophy Protein Kinase Splice Isoforms. A Study of Structure-Function Relationships.
No full textContains fulltext :
50033.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)RU Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, 06 juni 2006Promotor : Wieringa, B. Co-promotor : Wansink, D.G.159 p
DMPK E and Lats2 in the cell division cycle. Study of two AGC kinases
No full textContains fulltext :
110769.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, 05 april 2012Promotor : Wieringa, B. Co-promotores : Hendriks, W.J.A.J., Wansink, D.G
DMPK isoforms in muscle and brain cells. Localization and function.
No full textContains fulltext :
85871.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, 01 april 2011Promotor : Wieringa, B. Co-promotores : Wansink, D.G., Fransen, J.A.M.157 p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Book Reviews
No full textReviews of : Wansink, B. Marketing Nutrition: Soy, Functional foods, Biotechnology and Obesity Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2005; Motzafi-Haller, P. (ed.) Women in Agriculture in the Middle East Aldershot, England: Ashgate Publishing, 2005Teaching/Communication/Extension/Profession,
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
At the movies: how external cues and perceived taste impact consumption volume
No full textExternal cues such as packaging and container size can powerfully and unknowingly increase how much food a person consumes. Do they still, however, stimulate consumption as the perceived favorability of a food declines? This was examined with popcorn in a theatre setting. Moviegoers who had rated the popcorn as tasting relatively unfavorable ate 61% more popcorn if randomly given a large container than a smaller one. Moviegoers who had rated the popcorn as relatively favorable ate 49% more when the container size was increased (and were likely to eat greater amounts if accompanied with a person of the opposite sex). One reason for this increase was that consumers had more difficulty monitoring how much they ate from large containers. Implications for raising the consumption levels of healthy, but unfavorable foods are investigated. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved
- …
