1,721,137 research outputs found
Ansatz zum Nutzungserleben im soziotechnischen Arbeitskontext
No full textDas Modell zum Nutzungserleben (user experience) im soziotechnischen Arbeitskontext versucht, die bisher weitgehend getrennten Konzepte Nutzungserleben, soziotechnisches System und Technology Acceptance zusammenzuführen. Es erfolgte eine explorative Untersuchung des Modells mit Hilfe einer Interviewstudie in vier Werken eines internationalen Automobilunternehmens. Als Ergebnis dieser Studie wurden Handlungsfelder identifiziert, die Auswirkungen auf das Nutzungserleben im Arbeitskontext haben können
Bridging the communication gap: a driver-passenger video link
Get PDF"In a recent large-scale naturalistic study, driver-passenger interactions were identified as a major source of driver distraction. According to this study, driver inattention to the road is often caused by conversation with passengers. This suggests that when driving and conversing with passengers, drivers attempt to bridge the visual communication gap with passengers by turning to look at them. In an online survey presented in this paper, responses confirmed that most drivers interact with their passengers while driving and and want eye contact during these interactions; however most would also prefer to keep their eyes on the road while driving. To address these conflicting preferences, a driving simulator user study was conducted with a monitor-based and a head-up display (HUD) video system. Results show that a video system can provide drivers with greater visual contact with passengers without degrading driving performance. Participants also had greater interest in using a HUD-based system." (author's abstract
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
