1,721,115 research outputs found

    EFEKTIVITAS PEMBELAJARAN KIMIA MENGGUNAKAN METODE PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF STAD (Student Team Achievement Divisions) DILENGKAPI MODUL UNTUK MENINGKATKAN PRESTASI BELAJAR SISWA MATERI POKOK PERHITUNGAN KIMIA KELAS X SEMESTER 1 MAN KARANGANYAR TAHUN PELAJARAN 2008/2009

    No full text
    ABSTRACT Wagiyo. THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CHEMISTRY LEARNING WITH USING COOPERATIVE METHOD OF STAD (STUDENT TEAM ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS) WHICH IS ACCOMPANIED BY MODUL TO INCREASE LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT FOR THE STUDENT OF CLASS X SEMESTER 1 MAN OF KARANGANYAR, IN THE EDUCATION YEAR 2008/2009 , ON THE CHEMISTRY CULCULATE MATERIAL Thesis.Surakarta:Teaching Training and Education Faculty, Sebelas Maret University of Surakarta, August, 2009. This research aims is to know the efectivity with using cooperative learning method of STAD (Student Team Achievement Divisions) which is accompanied by modul. This research uses experiment research of method with design for research from the arrangement of Randomized Control Group Pretest-Postest Design. Population in this research are student of class X semester 1 MAN of Karanganyar in the education year of 2008/2009. Sample taking is done with random sampling with research sample of class X1 as experiment class, chemistry learning is done with using cooperative learning method of STAD (Student Team Achievement Divisions) which is accompanied by modul, while class X2 as control class with using explanatory method . Data collecting method which is test method for achievement variable of cognitive aspect and questioner for learning result of affective aspect. Data analyze technique is right–t test. From the result of the research can be concluded that using cooperative learning method of STAD (Student Team Achievement Divisions) which is accompanied by modul efective to increasing learning achievement for the student coverages cognitive and affective aspect. It can be seen from the result of analyze with right t-test that showed the value of tcalculation gained. For cognitive capability tcalculation = 2,3682 > ttable =1,67 and affective capability tcalculation = 4,2475 > ttable =1,67 with significance level 5 %. ABSTRAK digilib.uns.ac.id Wagiyo. EFEKTIVITAS PEMBELAJARAN KIMIA MENGGUNAKAN METODE PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF STAD (Student Team Achievement Divisions) DILENGKAPI MODUL UNTUK MENINGKATKAN PRESTASI BELAJAR SISWA MATERI POKOK PERHITUNGAN KIMIA KELAS X SEMERTER 1 MAN KARANGANYAR TAHUN PELAJARAN 2008/2009. Skripsi,Surakarta: Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu pendidikan. Universitas Sebelas Maret, Agustus 2009. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui efektivitas pembelajaran kimia menggunakan metode kooperatif STAD (Student Team Achievement Divisions) dilengkapi modul. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode eksperimen dengan desain dari rancangan Randomized Group Pretest-Posttest Design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas X semester I MAN Karanganyar tahun pelajaran 2008/2009. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan random sampling dengan sampel penelitian kelas X1 sebagai kelas eksperimen, pembelajaran kimia dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode kooperatif STAD (Student Team Achievement Division) dilengkapi modul, sedangkan kelas X2 sebagai kelas kontrol menggunakan metode ceramah. Pengumpulan data dengan menggunakan metode tes untuk variabel prestasi belajar aspek kognitif dan angket untuk hasil belajar aspek afektif. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah uji t-pihak kanan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa pembelajaran kimia menggunakan metode kooperatif STAD (Student Team Achievement Divisions) dilengkapi modul efektif meningkatkan prestasi belajar siswa baik dari aspek kognitif maupun aspek afektif. Hal ini dapat dilihat dari uji-t pihak kanan pada taraf signifikansi 5% yang menunjukkan harga uji-t dari selisih nilai aspek kognitif yaitu: thitung = 2,3682 lebih besar dari ttabel=1,67, sedangkan harga uji-t dari nilai aspek afektif yaitu: thitung= 4,2475 lebih besar dari ttabel= 1,67

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    No full text
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    No full text
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    No full text
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    No full text
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
    corecore