1,721,032 research outputs found
LegalRuleML: Design Principles and Foundations
No full textThis tutorial presents the principles of the OASIS Legal-
RuleML applied to the legal domain and discusses why, how, and when
LegalRuleML is well-suited for modelling norms. To provide a framework
of reference, we present a comprehensive list of requirements for devising
rule interchange languages that capture the peculiarities of legal rule
modelling in support of legal reasoning. The tutorial comprises syntactic,
semantic, and pragmatic foundations, a LegalRuleML primer, as well as
use case examples from the legal domain
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - JURIX 2017: The Thirtieth Annual Conference
Full text linkThe proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems – JURIX 2017. For three decades, the JURIX conferences have been held under the auspices of the Dutch Foundation for Legal Knowledge Based Systems (www.jurix.nl). In the time, it has become a European conference in terms of the diverse venues throughout Europe and the nationalities of
participants
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
OWL ontology of basic legal concepts (LKIF-Core). Estrella: Deliverable 1.4.
No full textThis document is part of Deliverable D1.4 of the Estrella project. It reports the work performed under Task 1.5 of the Estrella Workplan: “Defining an ontology of basic legal concepts, using the Ontology Web Language (OWL).” The ontology itself is the other part of this Deliverable. In this document we describe the methodology used to develop the ontology, which we have named LKIF-Core ontology. The workplan suggests that by starting from an already existing core-ontology – LRI-Core [Breuker et al., 2004b]— this development process could be a rather simple top-down approach.1 This was not the case, as the number of legal concepts in LRI-Core was rather small; it was rather a top ontology covering abstract concepts of common-sense rather than the field of law. Moreover, it appeared that in law, and in particular in legal reasoning, complex patterns of concepts are used, which do not easily fit into an ontology. We adopted a rather restrictive view on what should be in an ontology and what kinds of knowledge are beyond the scope of an ontology proper, and should rather be separated from the ontology. This kind of knowledge structures are called: frameworks. This distinction was not so much inspired by conceptual puritanism, based upon experiences with earlier kinds of legal core ontologies [Breuker and Hoekstra, 2004a], but particularly by the fact that the expression of such structures in OWL-DL is often not, or only partially possible
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
