1,720,982 research outputs found

    Maternal-fetal transplacental leakage of mitochondrial DNA in bovine nuclear transfer pregnancies: potential implications for offspring and recipients. CLONING AND STEM CELLS, 150-156, ISSN: 1536-2302

    No full text
    The synepitheliochorial placenta of ruminants is constructed of multiple tissue layers that separate maternal and fetal blood. In nuclear transfer cloned ruminants, however, placental anomalies such as abnormal vascular development and hemorrhagic cotyledons have been reported. We have investigated the possible exchange of genetic material between somatic cell nuclear transfer cloned (SCNT) bovine fetuses and recipients at day 80 of gestation using mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) as a marker. Twenty-three recovered SCNT-fetuses and their recipients were screened for divergent and thus informative mtDNA combinations. Twenty-one fetuses generated by in vitro fertilization (IVF) or multiple ovulation embryo transfer (MOET) and the corresponding recipients served as controls. A search for recipient mtDNA haplotype in DNA extracts from fetal blood by PCR-RFLP analysis revealed three cases of chimerism (two SCNT, one IVF) among a total of 19 informative fetus-recipient pairs (eight SCNT, seven IVF, four MOET). Placental anomalies have also been observed in some IVF fetuses and the present data therefore suggests transplacental leakage of cell components or cells from the recipient into some fetuses generated by in vitro techniques. Further studies are necessary to determine (i) the nature of leaked material, (ii) whether there is bi-directional leakage, and (iii) whether leaked material is present in recipients and calves after parturition, i.e. whether leakage takes place in vivo. If recipients were chimeric for DNA or cells derived from genetically modified SCNT (or IVF) embryos, their subsequent utilization might be affected

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore