188,411 research outputs found
Plagiarism Composite Severity Calculations (Vossen, 2021b)
No full textPlagiarism Composite Severity Calculation (Vossen, 2021a) is part of the "Developing a Comprehensive Plagiarism Assessment Rubric" published by Education and Information Technologies at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11365-1. </p
R. Vossen, Archäologische Interpretation und ethnographischer Befund
No full textDuvernay-Bolens Jacqueline. R. Vossen, Archäologische Interpretation und ethnographischer Befund. In: L'Homme, 1971, tome 11 n°2. p. 127
Worldview and Social Practice: A discourse-space approach to political text analysis
Full text linkCienki, A.J. [Promotor]Vossen, P.T.J.M. [Promotor]Chilton, P. [Copromotor
Dog owner in problematic dog-rearing situations: Techniques of disciplining behaviour
Full text linkContains fulltext :
26968_dog_owinp.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)RU Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, 12 september 2005Promotores : Vossen, J.M.H., Felling, A.J.A. Co-promotor : Korzilius, H.P.L.M.167 p
A WordNet View on Crosslingual Language Models
No full textW. Tufa, W., L. Beinborn, and P. Vossen “A WordNet View on Crosslingual Language Models”, in: Proceedings of the 12th Global Wordnet Conference (GWC2023) San Sebastian, Spain, January 23-27, 202
Extending, trimming and fusing WordNet for technical documents
Full text linkThis paper describes a tool for the automatic
extension and trimming of a multilingual
WordNet database for cross-lingual retrieval
and multilingual ontology building in
intranets and domain-specific document
collections. Hierarchies, built from
automatically extracted terms and combined
with the WordNet relations, are trimmed
with a disambiguation method based on the
document salience of the words in the
glosses. The disambiguation is tested in a
cross-lingual retrieval task, showing
considerable improvement (7%-11%). The
condensed hierarchies can be used as
browse-interfaces to the documents
complementary to retrieval
Debating Humanitarian Intervention
No full textThe book offers contrasting views of humanitarian intervention—a war aimed at ending tyranny or violence. Fernando Tesón argues that humanitarian interventions are sometimes permissible; Bas van der Vossen argues that as a rule they are not. The authors use the tools of modern analytic philosophy, in particular just war theory, to substantiate their claims. According to Tesón, a humanitarian intervention has the same just cause as a justified revolution: ending tyranny. He analyzes the different kinds of just cause and whether or not an intervener may pursue other justified causes. For Tesón, the permissibility of humanitarian intervention is almost exclusively determined by the rules of proportionality. Bas van der Vossen, by contrast, holds that military intervention is morally impermissible in almost all cases. Justified interventions, van der Vossen argues, must have high ex ante chance of success. Analyzing the history and prospects of intervention shows that they almost never do.</p
Rüdigen Vossen et Wilhelm Ebert, Marokkanische Töpferei, Poterie marocaine. Localités de potiers et centres de poterie
No full textTroin Jean-François. Rüdigen Vossen et Wilhelm Ebert, Marokkanische Töpferei, Poterie marocaine. Localités de potiers et centres de poterie. In: Annales de Géographie, t. 99, n°554, 1990. p. 503
- …
