1,720,954 research outputs found
Malentendu, différence et sens commun
Missverständnis, Unterschiede und gesunder Menschenverstand.
Ausgehend von dem Erfahrungsfeld des Austausches zwischen Pflegekräften und Patienten im Krankenhaus leitet dieser Artikel die theoretischen Grundlagen eines interindividuellen und interkulturellen Konzeptes für Missverständnisse ab. Welche Unterschiede gibt es zwischen Missverständnis und ähnlichen Verständnisstörungen wie Vorurteilen, Stereotypen, Aberglauben und Glaubensvorstellungen, die die Umrisse unserer gegenseitigen Verständigungs schwierigkeiten bilden und uns davon abhalten, harmonische Beziehungen einzugehen ? Der Artikel unterstreicht die Existenz von Missverständnissen als Konzept, um eine sich ständig verändernde und unstete Realität unserer Zeit zu beschreiben, in der es keine gemeinsamen Nenner mehr gibt, und das Erfordernis, den Rahmen und die Beziehungen zwischen Menschen und sozialen Gruppen ständig neu anzupassen. Missverständnisse zeigen Beziehungshindernisse auf und funktionieren gleichzeitig als Gelegenheit, Beziehungsverhältnisse neu zu überdenken und neue Modalitäten des Zusammenlebens in einer pluralistischen Gesellschaft zu schaffen.Misunderstandings, difference and common sense.
Based on field experience with exchanges between carers and foreign immigrant patients in a hospital environment, the article puts forward the theoretical basis for a conception of misunderstandings which is both inter-individual and intercultural. What differentiates misunderstandings from similar concepts (prejudice, stereotypes and beliefs) which define the outline of mutual difficulties in understanding and prevent us from building up a mutually harmonious relationship ? The article underlines the relevance of misunderstandings as a concept for describing a fragile and constantly changing contemporary reality, marked by the loss of common reference points and in constant need of redefining what is at stake, the framework and codes inherent in relations between individuals or social groups. Misunderstandings denote obstacles hindering the relationship. They function both as opportunities to redefine the terms of the relationship and a potential for encouraging new modes of cohabitation in a many-faceted world.Partant d’un terrain d’expérience qui est celui des échanges entre soignants et patients immigrés étrangers dans un cadre hospitalier, l’article pose les bases théoriques d’une conception à la fois interindividuelle et interculturelle du malentendu. Quelles sont les différences entre le malentendu et des concepts similaires (préjugés, stéréotypes, croyances) qui définissent le contour des difficultés de compréhension mutuelle et nous empêchent d’instaurer des relations réciproquement harmonieuses ? L’article souligne la pertinence du malentendu comme concept pour décrire une réalité contemporaine fragile et en constante transformation, marquée par la perte des repères communs et la nécessité de constamment redéfinir les enjeux, les cadres et les codes des relations entre individus et groupes sociaux. Les malentendus signalent des obstacles dans la relation et fonctionnent en même temps comme autant d’opportunités de redéfinir les termes de cette relation et de relancer de nouvelles modalités de cohabitation dans un monde plurielProfita Gabriele, Volclair Alain. Malentendu, différence et sens commun. In: Revue des sciences sociales, N°50, 2013. Malentendus. pp. 122-133
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
DeepL résout-il les conflits ? Bio-traduire et post-éditer les courriers d'avocats de l'italien en français
À l’automatisation ambiante, la TA ne déroge pas. Problèmes éthiques, retour à une objection préjudicielle moderne. L’article se fixe l’objectif de soulever quelques interrogations traductologiques et de fournir des éléments de réponse par le prisme de la traduction juridique des courriers d’avocats de l’italien en français. Est-ce un genre textuel à part entière ? L’intervention humaine est-elle obligatoire ? Peut-on laisser entre les mains de l’IA la résolution de litiges relevant du droit civil ? La performativité est-elle transférable d’une langue à une autre par DeepL sans comporter de risques rédhibitoires ? 12 traducteurs professionnels ont été mis à l’épreuve de la Post-édition pour tracer la voie d’une bonne pratique
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
