3,478 research outputs found
Letter re: Fort Worth visit
No full textLetter from Estil Vance, president of The Fort Worth National Bank, to Amon Carter thanking Carter for his hospitality during the visit to Fort Worth of a Mr. Chenery
Letter re: Bell Aircraft Corporation officers visit
No full textLetter from Estil Vance, president of The Fort Worth National Bank, to Amon Carter informing Carter of the impending Fort Worth visit of the directors and officers of Bell Aircraft Corporatio
Left to right, Amon Carter, Bert Honea, Guy E. Vance and Homer Belew
No full textLeft to right, Amon Carter, Bert Honea, Guy E. Vance and Homer Belew.https://mavmatrix.uta.edu/specialcollections_startelegram1950s/13579/thumbnail.jp
The wages of principle and power : Cyrus R. Vance and the making of foreign policy in the Carter administration
No full textThesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2009.; Includes bibliographical
references.; Text (Electronic thesis) in PDF format. On April 28, 1980, Secretary of State
Cyrus R. Vance joined William Jennings Bryan in the exclusive club of U.S. secretaries of
state who resigned in the twentieth century as a matter of principle. Cyrus Vance fought and
lost a number of significant policy battles during the Jimmy Carter administration, but none
prompted him to resign until President Carter decided to undertake a military operation to
rescue U.S. hostages in Iran. Vance's forceful but lone opposition to the mission within the
administration was based on three factors: he believed the military rescue mission violated
U.S. foreign policies; he argued that the mission would endanger the lives of the U.S.
hostages and believed that negotiation could eventually secure the safe release of the
hostages; and he was convinced the mission would fail. As significant as Vance's resignation
was as a rare political act in U.S. history, it was his road to resignation, a road paved with
numerous conflicts involving principle and power, which merits a detailed historical analysis,
and provides valuable insights into the nature of leadership and the foreign policymaking
process during the Carter administration. This study focuses on how the disparate values,
leadership qualities, and strategic visions of Secretary Vance and President Carter helped to
ensure that Vance would engage in substantive and bureaucratic battles from the first days of
the administration until his resignation. Vance's struggles to hold Carter to what Vance
believed were mutually-accepted principles were an outgrowth of several factors. Although
Vance held a well-defined, consistent world view, Carter's statements and decisions over time
revealed that he did not share some of Vance's key strategic principles, particularly those
regarding the nature of Soviet power, the critical importance of a strategic arms agreement,
and the desirability of separating human rights and Third World issues from the East-West
context. Carter implemented a foreign policymaking structure that tilted the power in the
system to National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, created opportunities for policy
dissension, and ultimately undermined Vance's authority and influence. Finally, Vance and
Carter embraced different codes of professional behavior that affected the decisionmaking
process and policy outcomes
The Thinker, The Doer and The Decider: Zbigniew Brzezinski, Cyrus Vance and the Bureaucratic Wars of the Carter Administration
Full text linkWhen President Jimmy Carter entered the White House, he desired a decision-making structure that would be collegial and provide him with a diverse range of policy options from his principal advisors, Secretary of State Cyrus Vance and National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski. However, their differing outlooks coupled with a desire to control and manage U.S. foreign policy led to a furious and bitter battle to influence the administration’s agenda. This thesis analyses the relationship between Vance and Brzezinski and their struggles for the ear of the president.
It was a conflict exacerbated by the institutional rivalry between the National Security Council and the State Department as they battled with one another to affect policy. As issues arose, the president’s advisors, supported by their constituencies, jostled to orchestrate the administration’s strategies and approach. Subsequently, tensions increased as the conflict between Vance, Brzezinski and their departments developed into unbridled bureaucratic warfare within the Carter administration.
This study utilises the bureaucratic politics paradigm to illustrate how the influence of advisors and organisations can impact on presidential decision-making. While President Carter wanted to be the main decision maker in his administration, his insistence on a system that provided him with a range of advice precipitated the struggles between Vance and Brzezinski. As their disputes intensified, Carter was unable to effectively manage the views and advice of his advisors and formulate a clear strategy. As this thesis demonstrates, the bureaucratic politics model provides an effective framework to analyse the development and implementation of U.S. foreign policy.
While historians have neglected or played down the significance of their clashes, this thesis argues that the rivalry between Vance, Brzezinski, and their respective departments had a clear and visible effect on U.S. foreign policy. The bureaucratic wars raged throughout Carter’s time in office, contributing to a tapestry of inconsistencies that resulted in the administration’s inability to create a settled foreign policy agenda
Cyrus Vance (1917-2002): a busca obstinada da diplomacia
Full text linkO presente artigo busca analisar um breve balanço da atuação de Cyrus Vance enquanto secretário de Estado dos EUA durante a administração Carter.O presente artigo busca analisar um breve balanço da atuação de Cyrus Vance enquanto secretário de Estado dos EUA durante a administração Carter
Cyrus Vance (1917-2002) : a busca obstinada da diplomacia
Full text linkO presente artigo busca analisar um breve balanço da atuação de Cyrus Vance enquanto secretário de Estado dos EUA durante a administração Carter
The Carter Chronology
No full textThis paper proposes the Carter Chronology, a systemic realignment of the Hebrew Exodus within the mid-18th Dynasty of Egypt. Central to this model is the 1494 BC birth of Moses, which establishes a 1414 BC Exodus under Amenhotep II. By applying the "Rule of Inclusive Logic," the author demonstrates that the 480-year span of 1 Kings 6:1 represents a cumulative regnal total rather than linear solar time, resolving the 32-year variance to the 966 BC Temple foundation.
Furthermore, the paper offers a forensic analysis of the Amarna Correspondence, identifying the "Habiru" incursions as the primary archaeological signature of the Israelite Conquest (c. 1374 BC), specifically addressing the Shechem and Hazor synchronisms. Finally, the author defends the "Rameses" toponym (Exodus 1:11) as a scribal anachronism for the 12th-15th Dynasty site of Avaris, supported by the administrative reforms of Senusret III. This synthesis provides a 98/100 correlation between the biblical record and the archaeological strata of the Levant
Outstanding Southeastern Author Awards Go to Patchett and Carter
Full text linkMary Glenn Hearne, chair, presented SELA’s 2002 Outstanding Author Awards to Ann Patchett and Jimmy Carter
Jere Nash Interview with Rick Carter
No full textInterview conducted by author Jere Nash with casino proprietor Rick Carter as research for Mississippi Politics: The Struggle for Power, 1976-2006. Topics covered include Clark\u27s background; casino industry in Mississippi; legislation on gaming; and current status of casinos on the Gulf Coast
- …
