38 research outputs found
The Light We Give: Sikh Wisdom for Cultivating Empathy and Justice
Growing up in South Texas, Dr. Simran Jeet Singh and his brothers confronted racism daily. As a turbaned, bearded, brown-skinned Sikh, he continued to face prejudice and hate in college and beyond. Simran chose to be defined not by the negativity that often surrounded him but by the Sikh teachings of love and justice that he grew up with. Delving deep into these core tenets of Sikh wisdom, he has sought to embrace an outlook that guides us to see the good in everyone and to forge a path of positivity, connection, and service—a way of life that so many of us are seeking in today’s world.
We all say that we choose love over hate. But when tested, we realize that it’s easier said than done and that our empathy for others is not rooted deeply enough. As a turbaned and bearded Sikh man, Simran has been subjected to racism his whole life. He has been working on the frontlines of hate violence for more than a decade. And yet, he has managed to avoid falling into the toxic trap of hate and anger. In this lecture, drawing on his recent book The Light We Give, he will draw from his personal experiences and from hate incidents he has witnessed firsthand to share the wisdom he has gained on what it really takes to choose love over hate.
Simran Jeet Singh, Ph.D., is the Executive Director of the Religion & Society Program at the Aspen Institute and the author of the national bestseller The Light We Give: How Sikh Wisdom Can Transform Your Life (Riverhead, Penguin Random House). Simran\u27s thought leadership on bias, empathy, and justice extends across corporate, university, and government settings. He is an Atlantic Fellow for Racial Equity with Columbia University and the Nelson Mandela Foundation, a Soros Equality Fellow with the Open Society Foundations, a Visiting Lecturer at Union Seminary, and a Senior Advisor on Equity and Inclusion for YSC Consulting, part of Accenture.
Organized and hosted by the Interfaith Fellows Program of the Jay Phillips Center for Interreligious Studies at the University of St. Thomas and the Minnesota Multifaith Network in collaboration with the Lutheran Center for Faith, Values, and Community at St. Olaf College and the Interfaith Institute at Augsburg University. Cosponsored by Minnesota Multifaith Network, and the Office of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, the College of Arts and Sciences, the Diversity Activities Board (DAB), and the Department of Theology at the University of St. Thomas. Funded, in part, by generous grants from the Arthur Vining Davis Foundations, the Jay and Rose Phillips Family Foundation of Minnesota, and the Center for Faculty Development at the University of St. Thomas
Keynote Address: The Light We Give: Sikh Wisdom for Cultivating Empathy and Justice
Growing up in South Texas, Dr. Simran Jeet Singh and his brothers confronted racism daily. As a turbaned, bearded, brown-skinned Sikh, he continued to face prejudice and hate in college and beyond. Simran chose to be defined not by the negativity that often surrounded him but by the Sikh teachings of love and justice that he grew up with. Delving deep into these core tenets of Sikh wisdom, he has sought to embrace an outlook that guides us to see the good in everyone and to forge a path of positivity, connection, and service—a way of life that so many of us are seeking in today’s world.
We all say that we choose love over hate. But when tested, we realize that it’s easier said than done and that our empathy for others is not rooted deeply enough. As a turbaned and bearded Sikh man, Simran has been subjected to racism his whole life. He has been working on the frontlines of hate violence for more than a decade. And yet, he has managed to avoid falling into the toxic trap of hate and anger. In this lecture, drawing on his recent book The Light We Give, he will draw from his personal experiences and from hate incidents he has witnessed firsthand to share the wisdom he has gained on what it really takes to choose love over hate.
Simran Jeet Singh, Ph.D., is the Executive Director of the Religion & Society Program at the Aspen Institute and the author of the national bestseller The Light We Give: How Sikh Wisdom Can Transform Your Life (Riverhead, Penguin Random House). Simran\u27s thought leadership on bias, empathy, and justice extends across corporate, university, and government settings. He is an Atlantic Fellow for Racial Equity with Columbia University and the Nelson Mandela Foundation, a Soros Equality Fellow with the Open Society Foundations, a Visiting Lecturer at Union Seminary, and a Senior Advisor on Equity and Inclusion for YSC Consulting, part of Accenture.
Organized and hosted by the Interfaith Fellows Program of the Jay Phillips Center for Interreligious Studies at the University of St. Thomas and the Minnesota Multifaith Network in collaboration with the Lutheran Center for Faith, Values, and Community at St. Olaf College and the Interfaith Institute at Augsburg University. Cosponsored by Minnesota Multifaith Network, and the Office of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, the College of Arts and Sciences, and the Department of Theology at the University of St. Thomas. the , and in collaboration with the Office of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion at the University of St. Thomas. Funded, in part, by generous grants from the Arthur Vining Davis Foundations, the Jay and Rose Phillips Family Foundation of Minnesota, and the Center for Faculty Development at the University of St. Thomas
Critical Anaylsis on the Effects of Triple Talaq, the Plight of Women, its Impact on the Society Muslim Community
Today, the issues of women rights in muslim personal law is highly controversial. Specially, muslim women rights relating to triple talaq, inheritance, maintenance has got much attention nowadays. A muslim man can divorce his wife by prouncing three times talaq. When husband clearly mentions it is called as express talaq. After that husband and wife cannot be together back until wife marries someone else. The legal decisions are based on the norms mentioned in quaran therefore, certain anomalies need to be eradicated by giving true essence of holy quaran for the benefit of muslim women's right. There is three types of talaq namely, unlike other religion marriage is viewed as sacrament but, under, muslim law it is civil and social contract. Talaq ul sunnat sanctioned by prophet is sub divided into Talaq e ehsan, Talaq hasan, Talaq e biddat. The current debate on triple talaq, centred on the Sharaya Bano and several other petitions which considers no aspect of Islamic personal laws which amounts to violate the spirit of constitution. The whole triple talaq has become a battleground for the culture vs social debate. In this paper the author deals with the question of triple talaq in the light of the recent petition filed in the Supreme Court for declaring such talaq invalid. The author argues that there is an already existing legal precedent established by the apex court with respect triple talaq which should be followed instead of resorting in aggressive approach which may become dominant to muslim women themselves. This research paper analyze to attempt the on going implications on triple talaq, muslim personal law and solutions to empower muslim women. Simran Chhallani "Critical Anaylsis on the Effects of Triple Talaq, the Plight of Women, its Impact on the Society Muslim Community" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-2 | Issue-5 , August 2018, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd16996.pd
Nonprofit Youth Engagement: A Normalized Industrial-Complex
The 'Disrupting the Talent Pipeline: Youth Engagement & The Nonprofit-Industrial Complex' curriculum is intended to serve as an accessible resource to community that can be practically applied. This resource seeks to highlight key aspects of the experiences of 'multiply-marginalized' youth/young people navigating the nonprofit-sector, and its relationship to the industrial-complex that it perpetuates. The curriculum is informed by lived experiences as well as existing literature - offering both core content and activities/additional resources to guide its application in various community contexts.Not peer reviewe
Race through the finish line with your customers: Customer Segmentation and Profiling of CredRev
During a semester long research project, our research team analyzed the CRM of CredRev, an auto financing company based in Kelowna, BC with customers all over BC. Our research objectives were to perform customer segmentation and profiling for the chosen organization, promote greater CRM strategies with the use of customer databases, and increase the amount of customers for CredRev by further understanding their customer segments and profiles.This poster won the Vice-President, Students award (2020). Supervisor: Dr. David Dobson, School of Business
Data Model for Computer Vision Explainability, Fairness, and Robustness
In recent years, there has been a growing interest among researchers in the explainability, fairness, and robustness of Computer Vision models. While studies have explored the usability of these models for end users, limited research has delved into the challenges and requirements faced by researchers investigating these requirements. This study addresses this gap through a mixed-method approach, involving 20 semi-structured interviews with researchers and a comprehensive literature analysis.Through this investigation, we have identified a practical need for a data model that encompasses the essential information researchers require to enhance explainability, fairness, and robustness in Computer Vision applications. We developed a data model that holds the potential to improve transparency and reproducibility within this field, speed up the research process, and facilitate comprehensive evaluations, whether quantitative or qualitative, of proposed methodologies. To refine and demonstrate the practicality of the data model, we have populated it with four existing datasets. Additionally, we have conducted two user studies to validate the model's usability. We found that participants were enthusiastic about using the data model. Some potential uses described by the participants were comparing models and datasets, accessing (niche) datasets and models, creating and exploring datasets, and having access to ground truth explanations. However, participants also had concerns about the data model, mainly with its usability being restricted to people with database knowledge and the richness of data in the database. Nonetheless, hope that this research constitutes the first step for data modelling for researchers in the field of Trustworthy AI.https://github.com/delftcrowd/CV_datamodel Code on GithubComputer Science | Data Science and Technolog
Detecting Rhyming Words
Rhyming words are one of the most important features in poems. They add rhythm to a poem, and poets use this literary device to portray emotion and meaning to their readers. Thus, detecting rhyming words will aid in adding emotions and enhancing readability when generating poems. Previous studies have been done on the topic of poem generation. However, those works did not put too much emphasis on the rhyme detector. Thus, this research will solely focus on rhyme detection and its evaluation. The aim of this research is to determine the most accurate way of detecting whether two English words rhyme. English rhyming words will be detected using combinations of features. Five features are used: edit distance, hamming distance, jaccard similarity, longest common substring, and vowel and consonant weights. We also experiment with two methods of retrieving phonemes: using the entire phoneme translation, and using part of the phoneme translation. We find that using only hamming distance and jaccard similarity with part of the phoneme translation, we can already obtain an accuracy of 90.05% with a log loss of 0.25 when trained on a balanced dataset. The reason for this remains unclear because there is no clear separation between the two classes.CSE3000 Research ProjectComputer Science and Engineerin
Association Between Industry Sponsorship and Author Conflicts of Interest With Outcomes of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Interventions for Opioid Use Disorder
Introduction: Author conflicts of interest (COI) and industry sponsorship may lead to biased research results and conclusions. Considering the direct influence that systematic reviews have on patient care, including the management of patients being treated for opioid use disorders (OUD), these studies should be free of industry bias. Thus, we sought to determine whether a relationship exists between COI and the favorability of systematic review outcomes using a sample of systematic reviews regarding OUD interventions.
Methods: We searched MEDLINE and Embase for systematic reviews and meta-analysis related to OUD treatment. The study team performed all data extraction in a masked duplicate fashion. We searched for undisclosed COI for each systematic review author in 3 databases--the CMS Open Payments database, Dollars for Profs, and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). The research team quantified results using descriptive statistics. We evaluated associations between review characteristics using Fisher\u27s exact tests, when possible.
Results: This article includes seventeen systematic reviews and meta-analyses with 81 authors. We found that 25 authors (30.9%) had some form of COI, and 22 (of 25, 88.0%) authors had an undisclosed COI. However, no significant association existed between COI and favorability of results and conclusions. Notably, two systematic reviews (of 17; 11.76%) were industry-sponsored. Similarly, we found no association between the study sponsor source and the favorability of systematic review results and conclusions.
Conclusions: Our results suggest the favorability of systematic review results and conclusions are not influenced by author COI or industry sponsorship. However, nearly one-fourth of authors had an undisclosed COI, further emphasizing the need for standardization and adherence to COI disclosure policies within addiction medicine literature
Penmanship in print: English copy-books and their makers, 1570-1763
Starting in the 1570s, printed penmanship manuals promised to teach Englishpeople speedy, legible, even beautiful writing through textual instruction and illustrated specimens. Based upon an extensive survey of extant writing-books, this dissertation contends that writing-masters developed and deployed a range of strategies to establish their authority over their subject, their command over their art. As such, despite their fundamentally commonplace material (the accepted forms of the letters of the alphabet), their books could serve as proprietary proxies for their hands, bodies, and voices. By studying the construction of authorial expertise within functional, non-literary books circulating in a crowded, competitive market, this study argues for broader understandings of authorship beyond its inscription in canonical textual works. Examining a dispute between two late-sixteenth-century writing-masters, William Panke and Peter Bales, about creating letterforms through individual strokes, Chapter 1 shows why their common hybrid script-and-print method was an early revolution in the search for ways to successfully teach writing in absentia. An Interchapter exploring the early shift from relief to intaglio methods in printing English writing-books establishes the importance of illustrative technologies in the creation of successful calligraphical specimens. Chapter 2 captures how seventeenth-century writing-master Edward Cocker marketed himself, through an exceptionally large, innovative corpus and through verbal and visual rhetoric, as an instructor, artisan, and author-figure. As a counterpoint, Chapter 3 investigates the two-way trade in content between attributable and unattributed writing-books, and the motivations of the stationers who published them, to promulgate anonymity as an alternative model of authority. A second Interchapter traces the advent of an unembellished round hand, starting in the 1660s, placing the move toward uniformity in writing within the context of England\u27s increasingly mercantile culture. Chapter 4 consolidates late-seventeenth century writing-masters\u27 affinity for flourishes, drawings, and ornament into an aesthetics of excess that directly responded to the new emphasis on legibility and pragmatism in writing. Finally, Chapter 5 analyzes the emergence of a retrospective, curatorial impulse among eighteenth-century writing-masters, who, through visual anthologies and textual histories of domestic writing-books, depicted Britain\u27s economic power as a function of a national tradition in literacy
Analyzing the Brand Personalities and Social Media Practices of College Athletic Twitter Accounts
abstract: This study examined the brand personality types and social media practices of six college athletic Twitter accounts. Specifically, this study investigated whether certain brand personalities corresponded with specific social media practices on Twitter. The author conducted a content analysis of each school's tweets to measure brand personality and scraped data in order to collect social media practice information. Results suggest that brand personality and social media practices are distinct. Extraversion was the most common personality type among all schools. In addition, schools that tweeted less frequently than others exhibited more brand personality and used more visual media
