1,723,335 research outputs found
Mrs. Florence V. Jones Barnes
Full text linkMrs_Florence_V_Jones_Barnes.pdf - Funeral program for Mrs. Florence V. Jones Barneshttps://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/willowhillheritage-obituaries/10894/thumbnail.jp
People v. Jones
No full textIn People v. Jones the Supreme Court of California held that the Sixth Amendment guarantee of an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed is not satisfied when the jury is drawn from a panel which excludes jurors residing in the geographic area where the alleged crime occurred
People v. Jones
Full text linkIn People v. Jones the Supreme Court of California held that the Sixth Amendment guarantee of an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed is not satisfied when the jury is drawn from a panel which excludes jurors residing in the geographic area where the alleged crime occurred
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Practice argument in Clinton v. Jones
No full textTitle on cassette label: Supreme Court preview moot court argument America and the Courts, October 1996, Clinton v. Jones Broadcast on C-SPAN as part of the America and the Courts series
Filmed at Marshall-Wythe College of Law, College of William and Mary on October 25, 1996. Presentation was a part of the Institute of Bill of Rights Law
Participants conducted a practice argument before a panel representing the United States Supreme Court in the case of Clinton v. Jones, a civil suit filed against the President of the United States, on appeal from a decision of the Eighth Circuit. Rodney Smolla represented Bill Clinton; Michael Gerhardt represented Paula Jones. Paul Marcus chaired the presentation Michael J Gerhardt was Dean of the CWRU School of Law
Recommended from our members
Practice argument in Clinton v. Jones
No full textTitle on cassette label: Supreme Court preview moot court argument America and the Courts, October 1996, Clinton v. Jones Broadcast on C-SPAN as part of the America and the Courts series
Filmed at Marshall-Wythe College of Law, College of William and Mary on October 25, 1996. Presentation was a part of the Institute of Bill of Rights Law
Participants conducted a practice argument before a panel representing the United States Supreme Court in the case of Clinton v. Jones, a civil suit filed against the President of the United States, on appeal from a decision of the Eighth Circuit. Rodney Smolla represented Bill Clinton; Michael Gerhardt represented Paula Jones. Paul Marcus chaired the presentation Michael J Gerhardt was Dean of the CWRU School of Law
United States V. Jones 132 S. Ct 945 (2012)
Full text linkThe manuscript entitled United States V. Jones 132 S. Ct 945 (2012) was retracted on December 5, 2014. Please contact our office at [email protected] for more information.
Panel on United States v. Jones
No full textA student event panel on the Supreme Court Case, United States v. Jones ( the GPS case ), focusing on whether the government may attach a GPS to a car without a warrant and whether receiving information from the device is a search
- …
