323,285 research outputs found
B. Ubach, O. S. B. Legisne Toram ?. Vol. I, Phonologiam et Morphologiam complectens, 1931
No full textVincent A. B. Ubach, O. S. B. Legisne Toram ?. Vol. I, Phonologiam et Morphologiam complectens, 1931. In: Revue des Sciences Religieuses, tome 13, fascicule 1, 1933. p. 149
B. Ubach, O. S. B. Legisne Toram ?. Vol. I, Phonologiam et Morphologiam complectens, 1931
No full textVincent A. B. Ubach, O. S. B. Legisne Toram ?. Vol. I, Phonologiam et Morphologiam complectens, 1931. In: Revue des Sciences Religieuses, tome 13, fascicule 1, 1933. p. 149
[Retrato de Francesch Ubach y Vinyeta] [Material gráfico]
No full textInscripción: FANnco UBACH VINYET
D. B. Ubach, O. S. B., Legisne Toram ? Grammatica pratica linguae hebraicae, t. II, 1919
No full textDennefeld Louis. D. B. Ubach, O. S. B., Legisne Toram ? Grammatica pratica linguae hebraicae, t. II, 1919. In: Revue des Sciences Religieuses, tome 9, fascicule 3, 1929. p. 448
Capture of Ubach (30th Inf. Div), North of Aachen, 3-6 October 1944 (Siegfried Line offensive).
No full textCovers the operations of the 3d Battalion, 117th Infantry from its penetration of the Seigfried Line to the capture of Ubach, from October 3rd through 6th, 1944
Dom Bonaventura Ubach, O. S. B. — La Biblia, il-lustracio pals monjos de Montserrat, XXIII — 1, El-Genesi. Monestir de Montserrat, MCMXXIX
No full textMouterde René. Dom Bonaventura Ubach, O. S. B. — La Biblia, il-lustracio pals monjos de Montserrat, XXIII — 1, El-Genesi. Monestir de Montserrat, MCMXXIX. In: Mélanges de l'Université Saint-Joseph, tome 15, 1930. pp. 328-329
Ecos de ultra tumba
No full textPrecede al tit.: Inauguración de la estatua de Jovellanos, Gijón 6 de agosto de 1891Contiene además: A Jovellanos / Francisco Ubach y Vinyeta. A la memoria de Jovellanos / Ventura Ruiz Aguilera. Xovellanos / Juan Barcia Caballer
Diffusive author(s), cohesive author: Analysis of S/N (1994)
No full textThis study indicates the ways in which various aspects of the author(s) are brought forth in Dumb type’s performance art, the S/N production. Previous research has suggested a non-hierarchical organization of Dumb type and the absence of a “privileged author” in Dumb type’s collaborative work, S/N. However, the results that I have investigated from member’s interviews on the creative process of S/N along with my analysis of the recorded images of S/N, indicate a different aspect of the author(s). First, S/N was created through, so to speak, the collective ideas of the members of Dumb type. Further, S/N has at least nine quotations from previous performances, installations, and printed writings, besides the work-in-progress technique. Explicating one of the “author functions” as given by Michel Foucault, each text has plural subjects of the author. However, it has been revealed from members’ interviews that Teiji Furuhashi had a decision-making role in selecting the members’ ideas within the performance. Since then, S/N has had plural subjects of creation; however, Furuhashi is one of the subjects of creation along with the “privileged author.” S/N has plural authors (diffusive authors) yet at the same time, it has a “privileged author,” Teiji Furuhashi (cohesive author)
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
