1,720,954 research outputs found
Oskarżony jest pod ochroną, ale czy jest chroniony? – analiza werbalnych konstrukcji funkcyjnych w funkcji biernej typu stehen unter
In der Literatur werden Funktionsverbgefüge des Typs ‚stehen unter NP‛ aufgrund ihrer semantischen Ähnlichkeit zum Passiv der Kategorie ‚Passiv‘ zugeordnet (Pape-Müller1980, Weinrich 2002). Im vorliegenden Aufsatz zeigen wir auf, dass sich die beiden Konstruktionen nicht nur formal, sondern auch semantisch voneinander unterscheiden.Light verb constructions which have the form ‘stehen unter NP’ show semantic similarities to an eventive passive construction and therefore are treated as an instance of passive voice (Pape-Müller 1980, Weinrich 2002). In the current paper, we demonstrate that the two constructions show formal as well as semantic differences. W literaturze przedmiotu werbalne konstrukcje funkcyjne typu „stehen unter NP” ze względu na ich semantyczne podobieństwo do strony biernej przypisywane są do kategorii „stronabierna” (Pape-Müller 1980, Weinrich 2002). W niniejszym artykule pokazujemy, że obie konstrukcje różnią się od siebie nie tylko na płaszczyźnie formalnej, ale także semantycznej
Jak wzbudzić zachwyt lingwistów: Trzy wzorce werbalnych konstrukcji funkcyjnych z dopełnieniami w roli doświadczającego
Dieser Aufsatz beschäftigt sich mit drei Mustern von Funktionsverbgefügen mit Objekt- Experiencern: in N bringen, zu N bringen, in N versetzen. Die Muster haben gemeinsam, dass sie eine Kausativierung des durch das enthaltene Nomen denotierten emotionalen Zustands darstellen, unterscheiden sich jedoch in aspektuellen Eigenschaften, sowie darin, mit welchen Nomen sie kompatibel sind. Auf der Grundlage einer Korpusstudie zu 60 Emotionsnomen charakterisiert der Aufsatz Gruppen von Nomen, die in Bezug auf die Funktionsverbgefüge das gleiche Verhalten aufweisen, arbeitet Eigenschaften heraus, die die Funktionsverbgefüge blockieren, und schlägt Bedeutungen für die drei Muster vor.This paper deals with three patterns of light verb constructions with experiencer objects: in N bringen, zu N bringen, in N versetzen. The patterns have in common that they constitute a causativization of the emotional state denoted by the noun included in the construction, but they differ in aspectual properties, and in their compatibility with different nouns. On the basis of a corpus study on 60 emotion nouns, the paper characterizes groups of nouns showing the same behaviour with respect to light verb constructions, carves out properties that block the use of the light verb constructions, and puts forward suggestions on the semantics of the patterns.W artykule omówiono trzy wzorce werbalnych konstrukcji funkcyjnych z dopełnieniami w roli doświadczającego (Experiencer): in N bringen, zu N bringen, in N versetzen. Wzorce te mają tę wspólną cechę, że reprezentują przyczynowość stanu emocjonalnego denotowanego przez rzeczownik, który zawierają, ale różnią się właściwościami aspektowymi, a także tym, z jakimi rzeczownikami są kompatybilne. Na podstawie badania korpusowego 60 rzeczowników emotywnych scharakteryzowano w artykule grupy rzeczowników, które wykazują to samo zachowanie w stosunku do werbalnych konstrukcji funkcyjnych, opracowano właściwości blokujące werbalne konstrukcje funkcyjne oraz zaproponowano znaczenia dla trzech wzorców
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
