1,720,956 research outputs found
The UEMS training charter for pathology: a common trunk and a challenge ahead for the EFCS.
No full textBACKGROUND: Primary aldosteronism is the most frequent cause of secondary hypertension and is responsible for an increased risk of cardiometabolic complications. A concomitant subtle cortisol hyperproduction could enhance cardiovascular risk. We prospectively estimated the occurrence of subclinical hypercortisolism in primary aldosteronism patients.
METHODS: In a large population of hypertensive patients without clinical signs of hypercortisolism, 76 consecutive patients with primary aldosteronism were investigated. Differential diagnosis between unilateral and bilateral aldosterone hypersecretion was made by computed tomography/MRI and/or adrenal venous sampling (AVS). Subclinical hypercortisolism was defined as failure to suppress plasma cortisol to less than 50 nmol/l after 1 mg-overnight dexamethasone, used as screening test, and at least one of two other abnormal hormonal parameters, that is, adrenocorticotrophin (ACTH) less than 2 pmol/l and urinary cortisol more than 694 nmol/24 h.
RESULTS: Three out of 76 patients had postdexamethasone plasma cortisol more than 50 nmol/l. Only one also showed low-normal ACTH and mildly elevated urinary cortisol. The patient had a right 4 cm adrenal mass. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy was followed by short-term steroid replacement to prevent adrenal insufficiency. In-situ hybridization showed CYP11B1 expression exclusively in tumoral tissue, whereas CYP11B2 was expressed only in a peritumoral region composed of zona glomerulosa-like cells, suggesting the co-existence of a cortisol-producing adenoma and an aldosterone-producing hyperplasia in the same adrenal. The restoration of hormone abnormalities to normal levels was confirmed at 12 months of follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Concurrent aldosterone and subclinical cortisol hypersecretion seems to be a rare event in primary aldosteronism patients; however, its detection by appropriate testing is important to avoid AVS misinterpretation
The diagnostic role of PTEN and ARID1A in serous effusions.
No full textThe aim of this study was to analyze the diagnostic role of PTEN and ARID1A in effusion cytology. Effusions (n = 279), consisting of 226 carcinomas (70 ovarian, 64 breast, 36 lung, and 15 uterine corpus carcinomas; 41 carcinomas of other origin) and 53 malignant mesotheliomas, were analyzed for PTEN and ARID1A expression using immunohistochemistry. PTEN was preserved in 166 (59%) tumors, partially lost in 38 (14%), and absent in 75 (27%), with lower expression in malignant mesotheliomas compared to carcinomas, though not significantly (p = 0.084). ARID1A was preserved in 243 (88%) tumors, partially lost in 18 (6%), and absent in 18 (6%). The majority of tumors with absent ARID1A were ovarian carcinomas, predominantly of clear cell or low-grade serous type. Reactive mesothelial cells in carcinoma specimens were uniformly positive for both proteins. ARID1A mutation analysis showed no mutations in eight analyzed specimens negative by immunohistochemistry. Loss of PTEN and ARID1A expression is highly specific for malignancy in effusion pathology. Loss of PTEN is not informative of organ of origin, whereas absence of ARID1A should raise suspicion of an ovarian primary
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
The UEMS section/board of pathology, chapter 6: requirement for recognition of postgraduate training in pathology: a presentation of the paris document.
No full textAfter more than five years discussion the UEMS Section/Board of Pathology agreed a specification of requirements for recognition of post-graduate training in pathology, which is the key to the future of our discipline. The document published here, subject to ratification by UEMS Council, was voted on and accepted by the Pathology Board at the UEMS Paris meeting of 9 June 2012. Cytopathology is regarded as integral part of pathology: in general, training in pathology takes five years and maintains a common trunk of four (minimum three) years where surgical pathology, autopsy pathology and basic knowledge of neuropathology, dermatopathology and cytopathology are adequately trained and assessed. Training in so-called ‘areas of interests’ covers the remaining 12–24 months. Certificates of ‘advanced level of competence’ remain within the authority of national boards.
As senior members of its Executive Board, we believe that the European Federation of Cytology Societies (EFCS) should take responsibility for establishing 1) standards in the quality of cytopathology training, 2) training guidelines and qualification for advanced levels of competence in cytopathology, 3) manpower planning, 4) tutorials for pathologists and cytotechnologists and 4) standards of cytotechnologist training
- …
