1,720,956 research outputs found
Школа читателей Мандельштама: Читатели №№ 1, 2, 3
Full text link“To prove now, that the history of literature is not only the history of writers, but also the history of readers […] means to belabor the obvious,” stated Alexander Beletskii a century ago, but the task of the detailed detecting of the separate groups, or rather to use Boris Tomashevskii’s term, “schools” of readers, is still vital for the historians of modern Russian poetry. The following is the attempt to name the first “enrollees” of the school of reading Osip Mandelshtam’s poetry, two of them sharing his activities in the literary workshop “The Guild of the Poets” in St. Petersburg in the 1910s, and the third being the poet’s wife during 1919–1938.«Доказывать сейчас, что история литературы не только история писателей, но и история читателей <…> – значит ломиться в открытые двери», – утверждал А. И. Белецкий век назад, но задача конкретного выявления разрозненных читательских групп, или «школ», по слову Б. В. Томашевского, остается остро-насущной для историков новой русской поэзии. Ниже следует попытка обрисовать первых абитуриентов школы читателей лирики Осипа Мандельштама. Двое из них разделяли с ним опыт сотрудничества в рабочей поэтической мастерской «Цеха поэтов», третья была его женой с 1919 года до его смерти
Из Именного указателя к «Записным книжкам» Ахматовой: Томас Венцлова
Full text linkThe note continues a series of more than fifty publications that provide detailed commentary on the names of individuals recorded in Anna Akhmatova’s working notebooks. It analyzes the topics of Akhmatova’s conversations with the poet and translator of her poems into Lithuanian, Tomas Venclova. These conversations concern Akhmatova’s book of poems published in Lithuania in 1964, as well as Lithuanian poets and translators – both those documented in the notebooks and those presumably known to Akhmatova. A recurring topic of their discussions was the episode of Akhmatova’s and Nikolai Gumilyov’s brief stay in Vilnius in December 1914. In Venclova’s memoirs, we find Akhmatova’s remarks on Ivan Bunin’s Nobel lecture, selected poems by Osip Mandelstam, and the composer Andrei Volkonsky. The note also clarifies the identity of the ‘hero’ of one of Akhmatova’s favorite oral stories, which is likewise recorded in her Lithuanian interlocutor’s recollections.Заметка продолжает серию из пятидесяти с лишком публикаций, в которых подробно комментируются имена лиц, занесенные в рабочие блокноты Анны Ахматовой. В заметке анализируются темы бесед Ахматовой с поэтом и переводчиком ее стихов на литовский языкТомасом Венцловой. В этих беседах обсуждалась книга стихов Ахматовой, изданная в Литве в 1964 г., а также литовские поэты и переводчики, как зафиксированные в записных книжках, так и предположительно известные Ахматовой. Неизменной темой бесед был эпизод краткого пребывания Ахматовой и Николая Гумилева в Вильнюсе в декабре 1914 г. В воспоминаниях Венцловы зафиксированы отзывы Ахматовой о Нобелевской речи Ивана Бунина, отдельных стихах Осипа Мандельштама и композиторе Андрее Волконском. В заметке уточняется «герой» одной из излюбленных устных историй Ахматовой, которая также изложена в воспоминаниях литовского собеседника Ахматовой
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
