1,721,993 research outputs found
Approcci partecipativi alla formazione docenti basati sulla progettazione iterativa di percorsi didattici
No full text9781316809723, $103.99 Hbk
No full textThis article proposes a critical analysis on the relation between habit and reflexivity, evaluating Andreja Novakovic's contribution to this issue in light of recent literature on the subject of second natur
Progettazione in web di percorsi didattici sui circuiti elettrici e logici da parte di insegnanti di scuola primaria in formazione
No full textExploring the Relationships Between Undergraduate and High School Students’ Self-Efficacy, Engagement, and Attitudes Towards Physics
No full textThe aim of this study was to investigate the relationships between attitudes, engagement and self-efficacy in physics. The analysis was based on three Likert-scale surveys designed to measure the constructs addressed and administered online to N = 1,971 Italian undergraduate and high school students. After exploring several possible models, we validated a structural model in which attitudes play the role of the independent variable, self-efficacy represents the dependent variable, and engagement acts as the overall mediator. The results have implications for teaching in terms of understanding the mechanism underlying the promotion of students’ self-efficacy in physics
CHILDREN'S NAIVE IDEAS REASONING ABOUT SOME LOGIC CIRCUITS EXPLORED IN AN INFORMAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENT
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
