1,720,955 research outputs found
Promotion of the pro-social behaviours during the Covid 19 pandemic
No full textPoznavanjem pozitivnih, negativnih i ometajućih osobnih i socijalnih čimbenika u prihvaćanju prosocijalnih mjera u sučeljavanju s Covid pandemijom moći će se bolje planirati javno-zdravstveni postupci.
Pozitivni učinci mjera bili su: rad s lokalnim zajednicama i dopiranje do različitih populacija smatra se instrumentalnim kada je riječ o motiviranju ljudi na cijepljenje. Pozitivni privatni uzori rađaju pozitivnije ponašanje, što rezultira prosocijalnim ponašanjem; suprotno vrijedi za negativne uzore
Negativni učinci mjera bili su infodemija i širenje lažnih panike i pogriješnih informacija
Ometajući čimbenici promocije prosocijalnog ponašanja bili su osim religiojskih vjerovanja i negativnih socijalnih uzora: prakticiranje nezdravstvenih obrasca ponašanja prije pandemije Covid-19 (konzumacija duhana, alkohola); niži stupanj obrazovanja/informiranosti pojedinca/roditelja; prisutnost psihičkih poremećaja (anksioznost, depresija; religijska vjerovanja koja mogu imati negativan utjecaj na odluke vezane za cijepljenje ukoliko cjepiva koji koriste sadrže embrinalne stanice dok s druge mogu imati pozitivni utjecaj na zaštitu mentalnog zdravlja tijekom socijalne izolacije i nepovjerenje u vladu, zdravstveni sustav ili određene političke opcije dovode do lošijeg pridržavanja prosocijalnih mjeraBy knowing the positive, negative and hindering personal and social factors in the acceptance of prosocial measures in the face of the Covid pandemic, it will be possible to better plan public health procedures.
The positive effects of the measures were: working with local communities and reaching out to different populations is considered instrumental when it comes to motivating people to get vaccinated. Positive private role models breed more positive behavior, which results in prosocial behavior; the opposite is true for negative role models
The negative effects of the measures were an infodemic and the spread of false panic and wrong information
In addition to religious beliefs and negative social role models, the factors hindering the promotion of prosocial behavior were: practicing unhealthy patterns of behavior before the Covid-19 pandemic (tobacco, alcohol consumption); lower level of education/information of the individual/parent; the presence of psychological disorders (anxiety, depression; religious beliefs that can have a negative impact on decisions related to vaccination if the vaccines they use contain embryonic cells, while on the other hand they can have a positive impact on the protection of mental health during social isolation and mistrust in the government, the health system or certain political options lead to worse adherence to prosocial measure
Promotion of the pro-social behaviours during the Covid 19 pandemic
No full textPoznavanjem pozitivnih, negativnih i ometajućih osobnih i socijalnih čimbenika u prihvaćanju prosocijalnih mjera u sučeljavanju s Covid pandemijom moći će se bolje planirati javno-zdravstveni postupci.
Pozitivni učinci mjera bili su: rad s lokalnim zajednicama i dopiranje do različitih populacija smatra se instrumentalnim kada je riječ o motiviranju ljudi na cijepljenje. Pozitivni privatni uzori rađaju pozitivnije ponašanje, što rezultira prosocijalnim ponašanjem; suprotno vrijedi za negativne uzore
Negativni učinci mjera bili su infodemija i širenje lažnih panike i pogriješnih informacija
Ometajući čimbenici promocije prosocijalnog ponašanja bili su osim religiojskih vjerovanja i negativnih socijalnih uzora: prakticiranje nezdravstvenih obrasca ponašanja prije pandemije Covid-19 (konzumacija duhana, alkohola); niži stupanj obrazovanja/informiranosti pojedinca/roditelja; prisutnost psihičkih poremećaja (anksioznost, depresija; religijska vjerovanja koja mogu imati negativan utjecaj na odluke vezane za cijepljenje ukoliko cjepiva koji koriste sadrže embrinalne stanice dok s druge mogu imati pozitivni utjecaj na zaštitu mentalnog zdravlja tijekom socijalne izolacije i nepovjerenje u vladu, zdravstveni sustav ili određene političke opcije dovode do lošijeg pridržavanja prosocijalnih mjeraBy knowing the positive, negative and hindering personal and social factors in the acceptance of prosocial measures in the face of the Covid pandemic, it will be possible to better plan public health procedures.
The positive effects of the measures were: working with local communities and reaching out to different populations is considered instrumental when it comes to motivating people to get vaccinated. Positive private role models breed more positive behavior, which results in prosocial behavior; the opposite is true for negative role models
The negative effects of the measures were an infodemic and the spread of false panic and wrong information
In addition to religious beliefs and negative social role models, the factors hindering the promotion of prosocial behavior were: practicing unhealthy patterns of behavior before the Covid-19 pandemic (tobacco, alcohol consumption); lower level of education/information of the individual/parent; the presence of psychological disorders (anxiety, depression; religious beliefs that can have a negative impact on decisions related to vaccination if the vaccines they use contain embryonic cells, while on the other hand they can have a positive impact on the protection of mental health during social isolation and mistrust in the government, the health system or certain political options lead to worse adherence to prosocial measure
Promotion of the pro-social behaviours during the Covid 19 pandemic
No full textPoznavanjem pozitivnih, negativnih i ometajućih osobnih i socijalnih čimbenika u prihvaćanju prosocijalnih mjera u sučeljavanju s Covid pandemijom moći će se bolje planirati javno-zdravstveni postupci.
Pozitivni učinci mjera bili su: rad s lokalnim zajednicama i dopiranje do različitih populacija smatra se instrumentalnim kada je riječ o motiviranju ljudi na cijepljenje. Pozitivni privatni uzori rađaju pozitivnije ponašanje, što rezultira prosocijalnim ponašanjem; suprotno vrijedi za negativne uzore
Negativni učinci mjera bili su infodemija i širenje lažnih panike i pogriješnih informacija
Ometajući čimbenici promocije prosocijalnog ponašanja bili su osim religiojskih vjerovanja i negativnih socijalnih uzora: prakticiranje nezdravstvenih obrasca ponašanja prije pandemije Covid-19 (konzumacija duhana, alkohola); niži stupanj obrazovanja/informiranosti pojedinca/roditelja; prisutnost psihičkih poremećaja (anksioznost, depresija; religijska vjerovanja koja mogu imati negativan utjecaj na odluke vezane za cijepljenje ukoliko cjepiva koji koriste sadrže embrinalne stanice dok s druge mogu imati pozitivni utjecaj na zaštitu mentalnog zdravlja tijekom socijalne izolacije i nepovjerenje u vladu, zdravstveni sustav ili određene političke opcije dovode do lošijeg pridržavanja prosocijalnih mjeraBy knowing the positive, negative and hindering personal and social factors in the acceptance of prosocial measures in the face of the Covid pandemic, it will be possible to better plan public health procedures.
The positive effects of the measures were: working with local communities and reaching out to different populations is considered instrumental when it comes to motivating people to get vaccinated. Positive private role models breed more positive behavior, which results in prosocial behavior; the opposite is true for negative role models
The negative effects of the measures were an infodemic and the spread of false panic and wrong information
In addition to religious beliefs and negative social role models, the factors hindering the promotion of prosocial behavior were: practicing unhealthy patterns of behavior before the Covid-19 pandemic (tobacco, alcohol consumption); lower level of education/information of the individual/parent; the presence of psychological disorders (anxiety, depression; religious beliefs that can have a negative impact on decisions related to vaccination if the vaccines they use contain embryonic cells, while on the other hand they can have a positive impact on the protection of mental health during social isolation and mistrust in the government, the health system or certain political options lead to worse adherence to prosocial measure
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
