1,720,954 research outputs found
GOENAWAN MOHAMAD: STUDI SEJARAH INTELEKTUAL 1960-2001
This study attempts to review vitae Goenawan Mohamad as an intellectual
in the history of modern Indonesia literature, especially his acts as a of man of
letters and journalist. Further of showing thought Goenawan Mohamad
concerning power, freedom, and democracy set out in his works. Limit early this
study is 1960, when Goenawan Mohamad start intersect with community
intellectual in Jakarta during he began in the University of Indonesia and his
writings start shown on a number of literature magazines. While, the ends of this
study was the year 2001, when Goenawan Mohamad aged sixty years and a few
years before Goenawan back in front Tempo magazine after being ‘pembredelan’.
In 2001 chosen also as an momentum authorship Goenawan Mohamad career,
characterized by publishing a complete essays and poems.
This research in a historical presented in the form of descriptive analysis.
As for source used is the source of written, good primary and secondary. Source
written primary used between of essays and poem written by Goenawan
Mohamad. While, of secondary written was the relevant books, newspaper, and
magazines in accordance with discussion on the and writing Goenawan
Mohamad.
The results of study show that the background of families who have
attention to books and intellectuality and experiences intersection of a number of
communities with intellectual participate help he horizon intellectuality
Goenawan Mohamad to the modern Indonesia history. Then pertaining to thought
Goenawan concerning power, freedom, and democracy was one links could not
be separated. Because criticism of power, Goenawan shows that individual
freedom is the tahat should be esteemed and precedence, and democracy is a
sytem that enables it was reached. Because democracy is management essence
hope to an effort to freedom man unkempt. This is closely related to experience
and acts of Goenawan Mohamad as individuals wrought by a history
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Asuhan keperawatan pada klien NY.S dengan post operasi laparoskopi Kolesistektomi diruang mawar lantai V RS.Puri cinere depok
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
