1,721,015 research outputs found
Diagnostic Accuracy of Dynamic Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
No full textContext: A dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy (DSNB) is used for inguinal lymph node staging in patients presenting with primary penile cancer with clinically impalpable inguinal lymph nodes (cN0). Further completion radical inguinal lymph node dissection (RLND) is offered to patients diagnosed with metastatic inguinal nodes following a DSNB. Objective: To identify the diagnostic accuracy of a DSNB and RLND to detect lymph node metastasis. Evidence acquisition: A systematic literature search was performed on PubMed Medscape, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane database for relevant studies between January 1, 2000 and April 30, 2022. Studies were included if a DSNB was offered to cN0 patients and if RLND was offered to patients with positive histology at the DSNB. Risk of bias and confounding assessments were performed. Diagnostic odds ratio, pooled sensitivity/specificity, and heterogeneity analyses were displayed. Evidence synthesis: Overall, 2893 patients in the 28 studies analysed underwent a DSNB. Twenty-one studies reported patients undergoing RLND for a positive DSNB. A DSNB showed pooled weighted sensitivity of 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.82-0.91) and pooled log diagnostic odds ratio of 6.17 (95% CI: 5.47-6.87). A DSNB showed pooled weighted sensitivity of 0.50 (95% CI: 0.24-0.59), specificity of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78-0.87), and a log diagnostic odds ratio of 1.18 (95% CI: 0.29-2.97) for detecting further positive lymph nodes at RLND. High heterogeneity, mostly caused by study design, characteristics of the included patients, DSNB technique used, surgical experience/centre case volumes, and follow-up schedule, represents the main limitation of this meta-analysis. Several sensitivity analyses to address these issues support our findings. Conclusions: A positive DSNB is poorly able to discriminate which patients will have further metastatic involvement at completion RLND. Better stratification of these patients would avoid unnecessary overtreatment and possible postoperative comorbidities. Patient summary: This analysis of the data from the published literature provides evidence that the diagnostic accuracy of a dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy (DSNB) requires further improvement. Moreover, a high proportion of patients with a positive DSNB undergo unnecessary radical lymph node dissection; better stratification of these patients might help determine avoidable overtreatment and postoperative comorbidities
Management of patients who opt for radical prostatectomy during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: an international accelerated consensus statement
No full textObjective: Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic caused delays in definitive treatment of patients with prostate cancer. Beyond the immediate delay a backlog for future patients is expected. The objective of this work is to develop guidance on criteria for prioritisation of surgery and reconfiguring management pathways for patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer who opt for surgical treatment. A second aim was to identify the infection prevention and control (IPC) measures to achieve a low likelihood of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hazard if radical prostatectomy (RP) was to be carried out during the outbreak and whilst the disease is endemic. Methods: We conducted an accelerated consensus process and systematic review of the evidence on COVID-19 and reviewed international guidance on prostate cancer. These were presented to an international prostate cancer expert panel (n = 34) through an online meeting. The consensus process underwent three rounds of survey in total. Additions to the second- and third-round surveys were formulated based on the answers and comments from the previous rounds. The Consensus opinion was defined as ≥80% agreement and this was used to reconfigure the prostate cancer pathways. Results: Evidence on the delayed management of patients with prostate cancer is scarce. There was 100% agreement that prostate cancer pathways should be reconfigured and measures developed to prevent nosocomial COVID-19 for patients treated surgically. Consensus was reached on prioritisation criteria of patients for surgery and management pathways for those who have delayed treatment. IPC measures to achieve a low likelihood of nosocomial COVID-19 were coined as ‘COVID-19 cold’ sites. Conclusion: Reconfiguring management pathways for patients with prostate cancer is recommended if significant delay (>3–6 months) in surgical management is unavoidable. The mapped pathways provide guidance for such patients. The IPC processes proposed provide a framework for providing RP within an environment with low COVID-19 risk during the outbreak or when the disease remains endemic. The broader concepts could be adapted to other indications beyond prostate cancer surgery
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
