1,721,165 research outputs found

    Timepix3 detector for measuring radon decay products

    Full text link
    The present work is focused on the characterization of a Timepix3 (TPX3) based test system for the identification of particles produced by the complex decay chain of 222^{222}Rn. The detector used is composed of a pixelated Cadmium Telluride (CdTe) semiconductor (500 μm thick) bump-bonded on an ASIC TPX3 chip. Measurements were carried out at the NIXT Laboratory (ENEA Frascati) using radioactive sources and exploiting the presence of natural radon gas by collecting its decay products on the sensor surface. Estimation of the radon gas risk is one of the most important problems in radiation protection and has stimulated further development of new advanced methods suitable for detecting this gas in confined environments. A study of the spatial uniformity and high energy calibration is also presented and an improved cluster analysis is introduced. The performance highlighted in this study will allow a detailed and faster analysis of the radon products and may have an important impact on the environmental radioprotection applications. This paper describes the application and use of this test system to identify the different decay signatures and follow the temporal evolution of the Radon decay chain

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore