1,721,034 research outputs found
A Land for All Season: The Effect of Travelers’ Orientation on Awareness, Satisfaction, Place Image, and Travelers’ Loyalty(1st Edition)
Connecting Tourist Experiences to Places Pantea Foroudi, Chiara Mauri, Charles
Dennis, T C Melewar ... Two texts can be considered as seminal contributions to
the place branding literature, both published in 2002: the book Destination
Branding, edited by Morgan, Pritchard and ... The authors of the first book are two
academicians and one practitioner (Pride); the editor of the special issue (Anholt)
, ..
Correction to: Design, Branding and Marketing: Experience and Value Creation in Design, Branding, Marketing, Corporate Reputation and Identity (Corporate Reputation Review, (2024), 27, 2, (90-92), 10.1057/s41299-024-00187-1)
\ua9 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2024. The original version of this article, published on 8 April 2024, unfortunately contained a mistake. The following Authors and their affiliations were missing from the author list. Ann Petermans, Hasselt University, Belgium T C Melewar, Middlesex University, UK Charles Dennis, Middlesex University, UK The publisher apologizes for the error. The original article has been corrected
Correction to:‘The Good Place’: investigating the social responsibility image of countries and its impact on the attractiveness of highly skilled workers (Journal of Brand Management, (2025), 32, 3, (238-255), 10.1057/s41262-024-00373-w)
In this article, the affiliation details for the co-authors T. C. Melewar, Charles Dennis and Keith Dinnie were incorrectly published. For completeness and transparency, the incorrect and correct affiliations are displayed below The affiliation details for authors T. C. Melewar and Charles Dennis were incorrectly given as 'School of Business, University of Leicester, Brookfield Campus, 223 London Road, Leicester LE2 1ZE, UK ' but should have been 'Department of Marketing, Enterprise and Tourism, Middlesex University, The Burroughs, Hendon, London NW4 4BT, UK '. The affiliation details for author Keith Dinnie were incorrectly given as 'School of Business, University of Leicester, Brookfield Campus, 223 London Road, Leicester LE2 1ZE, UK ' but should have been 'School of Business, University of Dundee, Nethergate, Dundee, DD1 4HN, Scotland, UK'. The affiliation details for authors T. C. Melewar and Charles Dennis were incorrectly given as 'School of Business, University of Leicester, Brookfield Campus, 223 London Road, Leicester LE2 1ZE, UK ' but should have been 'Department of Marketing, Enterprise and Tourism, Middlesex University, The Burroughs, Hendon, London NW4 4BT, UK '. The affiliation details for author Keith Dinnie were incorrectly given as 'School of Business, University of Leicester, Brookfield Campus, 223 London Road, Leicester LE2 1ZE, UK ' but should have been 'School of Business, University of Dundee, Nethergate, Dundee, DD1 4HN, Scotland, UK'. The original article has been corrected.</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
An Attitudinal operationalisation of corporate reputation
Argues for an attitudinal conceptualisation of the corporate reputation construct
Vision, image, reputation and relationships: Critical drivers in shaping an airport city
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
