1,720,955 research outputs found
PROSES PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA PEMALSUAN TANDA TANGAN PADA SURAT PENJAMIN DAN PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN PIDANA BAGI YANG MEMAKAI SURAT PALSU ( STUDI KASUS DI POLRESTABES SEMARANG )
Full text linkTindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat adalah tindak pidana yang implikasinya berdampak pada kebenaran dan kepercayaan terhadap orang. Pelaku memakai surat palsu bertujuan untuk memperoleh keuntungan bagi diri sendiri. Untuk membuktikan pemalsuan tanda tangan korban atas perbuatan pelaku, korban harus melapor ke Polisi untuk dasar melakukan penyelidikan dan penyidikan atas pemalsuan surat. Permasalahan yang di teliti adalah : Bagaimana proses penyidikan tindak pidana pemalsuan surat, Bagaimana pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pemakai surat palsu ditinjau dari pasal 263 ayat (2) KUHP tentang pemakai surat palsu, Apakah dasar pertimbangan hukum oleh hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan pemakai surat palsu , Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis normatif dengan wawancara langsung terhadap penyidik Satreskrim Polrestabes Semarang yang menangani perkara pemalsuan surat , peneliti mengambil contoh kasus tentang pemalsuan surat, berdasarkan putusan Pengadilan Negeri Semarang Nomor : 636/Pid.Sus/2016/PN. Smg dengan terdakwa bernama NURCAHYA ARIESETIAWAN yang terbukti sah dan meyakinkan bersalah dengan mempertimbangkan bahwa Hakim meyakini bahwa perbuatan terdakwa dengan sengaja dan menghendaki serta menyadari adanya suatu keuntungan untuk dirinya bahwa surat palsu telah dipakai sehingga dapat menimbulkan kerugian, terhadap pelaku terbukti telah melakukan tindak pidana memakai surat palsu, harus mempertangungjawabkan secara pidana dengan vonis hukuman 1 tahun penjara dari ancaman maksimal 6 tahun penjara.
Hasil penelitiannya adalah bahwa Proses Penyidikan terdakwa pemalsuan surat telah di ungkap dalam proses Penyidikan di Kepolisian, Penuntutan di Kejaksaan, dan Persidangan di Pengadilan dan terdakwa dinyatakan bersalah, Pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pelaku pemalsuan surat adalah pelaku dituntut dan dijatuhi hukuman 1 tahun penjara, Dasar pertimbangan hukum oleh hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan bagi yang memakai surat palsu adalah dua alat bukti yang sah hakim memperoleh keyakinan bahwa suatu tindak pidana benar – benar terjadi dan terdakwalah yang bersalah melakukannya ( Pasal 183 KUHAP ).
Kata Kunci : Pertanggungjawaban pidana, pemakai surat palsu
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Pertanggungjawaban PidanaYang Memakai Surat Palsu DitinjauDari Pasal 263 Ayat ( 2) KUHP
Full text linkABSTRACTCriminal act of user letter forgery are violation that the implication take effect on trust and truth on people.The perperatorused letterforgery with the aim gained an advantage for himself. To Prove counterfeiting signature of the victim, the victim must report to the police for investigation of letter forgery. The problem research is : Criminal liability to users letters forgery in term ofarticle 263 verse (2) KUHP about counterfeiting letter. The research method that used is normative juridicial that support from direct interview withsat reskrim ( department of criminal investigation) investigator Polrestabes semarang that handle criminal act of letter forgery. Researcher take an example case about letter forgerybased on decision of distric court number636/Pid.Sus /2016/PN. Smg with the defendant named NURCAHYA ARIE SETIAWAN bin (alm) AMANTJIK AGUS who has prove guilty, with consideration that the judget believe if the defendant deliberately,willing and realize there is a benefit for himself, that the letter forgery had been use so causingdisadvantage,to the Person who has prove used counterfeiting letter, must be accounted for criminal law with the convict 1 years in prison frommaximal 6 yearsKey words: criminal liabilty, user of letter forgery ABSTRAKTindak pidana pemalsuan surat palsuadalah tindak pidana yang implikasinya berdampak pada kebenaran dan kepercayaan terhadap orang. Pelakumemakai surat palsu bertujuan untuk memperoleh keuntungan bagi diri sendiri. Untuk membuktikan pemalsuan tanda tangan korban atas perbuatan pelaku, korban harus melapor ke Polisi untuk dasarmelakukan penyelidikan dan penyidikan atas pemalsuan surat. Permasalahan yang di teliti adalah : Pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pemakai surat palsu ditinjau dari pasal 263 ayat (2) KUHP tentang pemalsuan surat Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis normatif dengan wawancara langsung terhadap penyidik Satreskrim Polrestabes Semarang yang menangani perkarapemalsuan surat,peneliti mengambil contoh kasus tentang pemalsuan surat, berdasarkan putusan Pengadilan Negeri Semarang Nomor :636/Pid.Sus/2016/PN. Smg denganterdakwa bernama NURCAHYA ARIESETIAWANbin (alm) AMANTJIK AGUS yang terbukti sah dan meyakinkan bersalah dengan mempertimbangkan bahwa Hakim meyakini bahwa perbuatan terdakwa dengan sengaja dan menghendaki serta menyadari adanya suatu keuntungan untuk dirinya bahwa surat palsu telah dipakai sehingga dapat menimbulkan kerugian,terhadap pelaku terbukti telah melakukan tindak pidana memakai surat palsu, harus mempertangungjawabkan secara pidana dengan vonis hukuman 1 tahun penjara dari ancaman maksimal 6 tahun penjara.Kata Kunci :Pertanggungjawaban pidana, pemakai surat palsu
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
