1,720,954 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Rancang bangun model pelayanan perizinan investasi terintegrasi
Private investment is important at providing development fund resources other than the state budget. The current target of the government is to develop business ease and to promote investment climate at regional level. Indonesia is currently ranked 73 in ease of doing business indexed by the World Bank Group in 2019. This condition is far below neighbouring countries such as Singapore, Malaysia, and Thailand.
Various efforts to promote business climate have been done, one of which is through improving licensing services. Licensing is defined as government authority given to individuals/groups who will carry out certain activities as part of the supervision and control process in the administrative mechanism. It means that the government plays an important role in creating a licensing system that administratively can support the development of the business climate, and at the same time the establishment of good governance in public service sector.
This research was conducted with the aim of (1) analyzing the current situation of the organization and the implementation of investment licensing; (2) analyzing the regulatory map and its implementation on investment licensing; (3) developing a conceptual model of integrated investment licensing, (4) designing strategies for implementing an integrated investment licensing service model. The methods used in this study include Situational Analysis, Regulation Mapping, Soft System Methodology, Regulatory Impact Analysis and Analytical Hierarchy Process.
The results of the study compiled from 230 sample of DPMPTSPs all around Indonesia through the distribution of questionaire and Focus Group Discussions as well as indepth interviews with expert respondents indicated that the quality of licensing services are still far from the ideal as expected by the government. The establishment of Agency of Investment and One-Stop Service or Dinas Penanaman Modal & Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu (DPMPTSP) in all Provinces and Regencies/Cities has not been able to strengthen the relationship between licensing services and investment rate. Moreover, the Ministry of Home Affairs' 2018 data, reveals that only 79.7% of the regional heads delegated all licensing and non-licensing authorities, as mandated by law, to the DPMPTSP. Regarding the nomenclature, 70% regional goverment has formed DPMPTSP with nomenclature in accordance to MoHA Decree Number 138 Year 2017. Moreover, it is found that the composition of DPMPTSP comprised of 32.17% A Type, 35.78% B Type, 25.22% C Type and 7.83% others. The centralization of authority by regional heads had make it difficult for the DPMPTSP to optimize its function as a one stop service agency.
Business actor expectation to receive easy licensing services has not been fullfiled. Convoluted mechanism problems, inadequate on-line application systems, inadequate infrastructure facilities, and inadequate skilled personnel are among problems encountered by business actors. In implementing the licensing service process the DPMPTSP is currently required to coordinate with the technical office to obtain a letter of recommendations before permits can be released. Nationaly, 45.91% of the technical teams are not assigned to be working one-roof in the DPMPTSP, but still situated in their technical office.
The results of the regulation mapping analysis shows that there are 12 Laws, 4 Government Regulations, 4 Presidential Regulations, 26 Ministerial Regulations that regulate the process of licensing services in Indonesia. Further analysis founds several problems regarding regulations arise both in central and regional level, namely: (1) overlapping and colliding regulations; (2) lack of National Standard Guidance; (3) unintegrated National Standard Guidance; (4) Regional Laws do not comply with National Law or National Standard Guidance, especially those which regulate the licensing service institutions.
From the above results, further analysis by utilizing the 6 stages of Soft System Methodology produced conceptual models, namely: (1) evaluation of regulations; (2) improvement of service mechanisms and (3) improvement of human resource quality. The designed model describes linkages among variables, actors, factors and the steps; as well as illustrates diagrammatically the format of the three decomposed submodels, and the format of the whole integrated one model. In order to design a strategy to implement the integrated investment licensing service model developed, the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) was performed. AHP scores show that from the three conceptual models it is known that the first priority is evaluation of regulation with a weight value of 0.539, the second priority is improvement of service mechanisms with a weight value of 0.244 and the third priority is improvement of human resources quality with a weight value of 0.217.
Strategic application of the evaluation of regulation model leads to the importance of National Standard Guidance templates formulation; and the necessity to enact an Omnibus Law. The strategy to apply the improvement of service mechanism model is done through an Institutional Arrangement advancement and Online Single Submission System Advencement. The strategy to execute the Improvement of Human Resource Quality at operational level is carried out by education and training as well as by the improvement of promotion and placement system of personnel; while for the quality improvement of human resources at decision making level (Local Government Head) is conducted by guidance and supervision according to Law Number 23 Year 2014 mechanism and technical assistance. Furthermore, it is nessecary to implement affirmative policy in a form of talent pooling and jobs requirement fulfillment. Finally, the results of the model validation show that the integrated investment licensing service model can be implemented
Rancang Bangun Model Pelayanan Perizinan Investasi Terintegrasi
Investasi swasta merupakan bagian sumber pembiayaan pembangunan yang penting di tengah keterbatasan Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Negara (APBN). Target pemerintah saat ini adalah membangun kemudahan berusaha dan iklim investasi di Daerah. Indonesia saat ini berada pada peringkat 73 dalam ease of doing business berdasarkan indeks World Bank Group tahun 2019. Kondisi tersebut jauh di bawah negara tetangga Singapura, Malaysia, dan Thailand. Berbagai upaya membangun iklim berusaha telah dilakukan, salah satunya melalui perbaikan pelayanan perizinan. Perizinan diartikan sebagai kewenangan pemerintah yang diberikan kepada individu/kelompok yang akan melaksanakan kegiatan tertentu sebagai bagian dari proses pengawasan dan pengendalian dalam mekanisme administrasi. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa pemerintah memegang peranan penting dalam menciptakan sistem perizinan yang secara administrasi dapat mendukung perkembangan iklim berusaha, dan sekaligus dalam rangka mewujudkan good governance dalam sektor pelayanan publik. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk (1) menganalisis situasi organisasi dan pelaksanaan perizinan investasi saat ini; (2) menganalisis peta regulasi dan implementasinya terhadap perizinan investasi; (3) mengembangkan model konseptual perizinan investasi terintegrasi; dan (4) merancang strategi penerapan model perizinan investasi terintegrasi. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Analisis Situasional, Regulatory Mapping, Soft System Methodology (SSM), Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) dan Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Hasil penelitian yang diperoleh dari 230 sampel DPMPTSP seluruh Indonesia dan responden pakar melalui penyebaran kuesioner, Focus Group Discussion (FGD), dan in-depth interview diketahui bahwa pelayanan perizinan masih jauh dari kondisi ideal, sebagaimana diharapkan pemerintah. Pembentukan Dinas Penanaman Modal Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu (DPMPTSP) belum sepenuhnya mampu memperkuat hubungan antara pelayanan perizinan dan peningkatan penanaman modal/investasi. Berdasarkan data pokok Kementerian Dalam Negeri Tahun 2018 diketahui bahwa baru 79.70% Kepala Daerah yang telah mendelegasikan seluruh kewenangan perizinan dan nonperizinan secara penuh kepada DPMPTSP sebagaimana ditentukan. Memperhatikan sisi nomenklaturnya, 70% daerah telah membentuk nomenklatur DPMPTSP sesuai Permendagri Nomor 138 Tahun 2017. Dilihat dari tipe struktur organisasi DPMPTSP ditemukan bahwa 32.17% Tipe A, 35.78% Tipe B, 25.22% Tipe C dan 7.83% lainnya. Sentralisasi kewenangan Kepala Daerah atas beberapa jenis izin menghambat proses pelayanan DPMPTSP. Kewenangan beberapa jenis perizinan yang bersifat sektoral juga masih belum diserahkan kepada DPMPTSP, sebagian masih dipegang oleh Kepala Daerah dan Dinas Teknis. Permasalahan pendelegasian kewenangan oleh Kepala Daerah menjadikan peran DPMPTSP belum optimal menjalankan fungsinya sebagai One Stop Service.
Ekspektasi pelayanan perizinan yang mudah bagi pelaku usaha juga belum terpenuhi. Permasalahan mekanisme yang berbelit-belit, sistem aplikasi elektronik yang belum optimal, sarana prasarana yang tidak memadai, dan sumber daya manusia yang kurang baik dari segi jumlah (kuantitatif) maupun mutu (kualitatif) menjadi masalah yang masih ditemui pelaku usaha. Dalam penyelenggaraan proses pelayanan perizinan saat ini DPMPTSP masih banyak tergantung kepada Dinas Teknis terkait penerbitan rekomendasi teknis. Penempatan tim teknis dari Dinas Teknis ke DPMPTSP kondisinya saat ini 45.91% tidak bertempat dan tidak berkantor di DPMPTSP, melainkan masih berkantor di Dinas Teknis masing-masing.Berdasarkan hasil Regulatory Mapping diketahui bahwa terdapat 12 Undang-Undang, 4 Peraturan Pemerintah, 4 Peraturan Presiden, 26 Peraturan Menteri/Kepala Lembaga yang mengatur pelayanan perizinan di Indonesia. Analisis pemetaan regulasi menghasilkan temuan permasalahan baik pada peraturan di tingkat pusat maupun daerah yaitu: (1) regulasi yang tumpang tindih dan bertabrakan; (2) perizinan belum memiliki Norma, Standar, Prosedur, Kriteria (NSPK); (3) NSPK tidak sesuai dengan prinsip integrasi; (4) Peraturan Daerah belum menyesuaikan dengan NSPK atau peraturan pusat, terutama mengenai kelembagaan pelayanan perizinan. Hasil analisis di atas kemudian diolah melalui 6 tahapan Soft System Methodology (SSM), menghasilkan model konseptual yang meliputi (1) evaluasi regulasi; (2) perbaikan mekanisme pelayanan; dan (3) peningkatan kualitas Sumber Daya Manusia (SDM). Model yang dibangun menguraikan keterkaitan antar variabel, aktor, faktor dan langkah-langkahnya; serta sekaligus menggambarkannya secara diagramatis dalam bentuk dekomposisi tiga submodel maupun dalam bentuk satu model menyeluruh secara terintegrasi. Dalam upaya merancang strategi penerapan model perizinan investasi terintegrasi dilakukan melalui Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Hasil AHP menunjukkan bahwa dari ketiga sub model konseptual diketahui bahwa prioritas pertama adalah evaluasi regulasi dengan nilai bobot 0.539; prioritas kedua adalah perbaikan mekanisme pelayanan dengan nilai bobot 0.244; dan prioritas ketiga adalah peningkatkan kualitas SDM dengan nilai bobot 0.217. Strategi penerapan model pada sub model evaluasi regulasi mengarah pada perlunya penyusunan format (template) NSPK dan penerbitan omnibus law berupa Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang (Perppu). Strategi penerapan model pada sub model perbaikan mekanisme pelayanan dilakukan melalui penguatan kelembagaan dan perbaikan sistem Online Single Submission (OSS). Strategi untuk sub model peningkatan kualitas SDM dilakukan dengan peningkatan kompetensi SDM operasional melalui pendidikan dan pelatihan serta perbaikan pola mutasi dan promosi personil, sedangkan SDM Kepala Daerah (pengambil keputusan) melalui mekanisme pembinaan dan pengawasan serta bimbingan teknis. Disamping itu, diperlukan juga affirmative policy berupa talent pooling dan pemenuhan persyaratan jabatan secara sistematis. Hasil validasi model menunjukkan bahwa model pelayanan perizinan investasi terintegrasi dapat diimplementasikan. Kat
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
