1,720,954 research outputs found
Women's experience of miscarriage : A literature review
Bakgrund: En graviditet ses hos många kvinnor som något positivt och för med sig mycket glädje, men en graviditet innebär också en risk för missfall. Omkring 20–30 procent av alla gravida kvinnor kan komma att drabbas. Ett missfall kan göra kvinnor extra sårbara och utsatta. Det är betydelsefullt att undersöka kvinnors upplevelser vid missfall för att få ökad förståelse och kunskap om hur missfall kan upplevas. Syfte: Syftet var att beskriva kvinnors upplevelser vid missfall. Metod: En litteraturöversikt har använts som metod för arbetet. Tio vetenskapliga originalartiklar med kvalitativ metod har analyserats utifrån Fribergs analysmodell. Litteraturöversikten utgick från kvinnor som haft missfall innan graviditetsvecka 22. Resultat: Resultatet innehåller tre huvudteman: Kvinnors emotionella smärta, Stöd från familj och vänner, Omvårdnad vid missfall samt två underteman: Missfall - ett stigma, och Känslig omvårdnad. Slutsats: Slutsatsen i denna litteraturöversikt var att kvinnor upplever en emotionell smärta med känslor av sorg, tomhet och hjälplöshet, och ett stöd från familj, vänner och andra kvinnor som genomgått missfall är viktigt för att de ska kunna bearbeta sitt missfall. Kvinnor beskrev att omvårdnaden var avgörande i hur de upplevde sitt missfall, och en känslig omvårdnad där vårdpersonalen visar empati och förståelse för kvinnan är väsentligt för hennes välmående vid ett missfall. Background: A pregnancy is seen by many women as something positive and brings a lot of joy, but a pregnancy also entails a risk of miscarriage. Around 20-30 percent of all pregnant women may be affected. A miscarriage can make women extra vulnerable and exposed. It is important to investigate women's experiences of miscarriage in order to gain increased understanding and knowledge of how miscarriage can be experienced. Aim: The aim was to describe women’s experiences of miscarriage. Method: A literature review has been used as a method for this work. Ten original scientific articles using a qualitative method have been analyzed based on Friberg’s model of analysis. The literature study was based on women who had miscarried before 22 weeks of pregnancy. Results: The result contains three main themes: Women's emotional pain, Support from family and friends, Nursing care in case of miscarriage, and two sub-themes: Miscarriage - a stigma, and Sensitive care. Summary: The conclusion of this literature review was that women experience an emotional pain with feelings of sadness, emptiness and helplessness, and support from family, friends and other women who have experienced a miscarriage is important for them to be able to process their miscarriage. Women described that the care was decisive in how they experienced their miscarriage, and sensitive care where the care staff shows empathy and understanding for the woman is essential for her well-being in the event of a miscarriage
Women's experience of miscarriage : A literature review
Bakgrund: En graviditet ses hos många kvinnor som något positivt och för med sig mycket glädje, men en graviditet innebär också en risk för missfall. Omkring 20–30 procent av alla gravida kvinnor kan komma att drabbas. Ett missfall kan göra kvinnor extra sårbara och utsatta. Det är betydelsefullt att undersöka kvinnors upplevelser vid missfall för att få ökad förståelse och kunskap om hur missfall kan upplevas. Syfte: Syftet var att beskriva kvinnors upplevelser vid missfall. Metod: En litteraturöversikt har använts som metod för arbetet. Tio vetenskapliga originalartiklar med kvalitativ metod har analyserats utifrån Fribergs analysmodell. Litteraturöversikten utgick från kvinnor som haft missfall innan graviditetsvecka 22. Resultat: Resultatet innehåller tre huvudteman: Kvinnors emotionella smärta, Stöd från familj och vänner, Omvårdnad vid missfall samt två underteman: Missfall - ett stigma, och Känslig omvårdnad. Slutsats: Slutsatsen i denna litteraturöversikt var att kvinnor upplever en emotionell smärta med känslor av sorg, tomhet och hjälplöshet, och ett stöd från familj, vänner och andra kvinnor som genomgått missfall är viktigt för att de ska kunna bearbeta sitt missfall. Kvinnor beskrev att omvårdnaden var avgörande i hur de upplevde sitt missfall, och en känslig omvårdnad där vårdpersonalen visar empati och förståelse för kvinnan är väsentligt för hennes välmående vid ett missfall. Background: A pregnancy is seen by many women as something positive and brings a lot of joy, but a pregnancy also entails a risk of miscarriage. Around 20-30 percent of all pregnant women may be affected. A miscarriage can make women extra vulnerable and exposed. It is important to investigate women's experiences of miscarriage in order to gain increased understanding and knowledge of how miscarriage can be experienced. Aim: The aim was to describe women’s experiences of miscarriage. Method: A literature review has been used as a method for this work. Ten original scientific articles using a qualitative method have been analyzed based on Friberg’s model of analysis. The literature study was based on women who had miscarried before 22 weeks of pregnancy. Results: The result contains three main themes: Women's emotional pain, Support from family and friends, Nursing care in case of miscarriage, and two sub-themes: Miscarriage - a stigma, and Sensitive care. Summary: The conclusion of this literature review was that women experience an emotional pain with feelings of sadness, emptiness and helplessness, and support from family, friends and other women who have experienced a miscarriage is important for them to be able to process their miscarriage. Women described that the care was decisive in how they experienced their miscarriage, and sensitive care where the care staff shows empathy and understanding for the woman is essential for her well-being in the event of a miscarriage
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
