1,721,883 research outputs found
Archives orales de la Convention du patrimoine mondial : entrevue menée avec Stephen Morris par Christina Cameron
No full textStephen Morris est chef du Bureau des affaires internationales au National Park Service (NPS) des États-Unis depuis 2004. Il détient un baccalauréat en arts libéraux de l’Oberlin College et une maîtrise en planification urbaine avec spécialisation en préservation historique de l’Université George Washington. Il a occupé différents postes au sein du NPS dans les 30 dernières années, ayant débuté sa carrière comme spécialiste en préservation historique au Registre national des lieux historiques. Il a également été chef de programme pour le programme d’assistance « Rivers, Trails and Conservation » du NPS avant de devenir responsable du programme du patrimoine mondial en 2002. En 2011, il a été rédacteur invité pour le 28e volume du George Wright Forum, au sein duquel on peut lire son article « Linking NPS to the World: The Role of the National Park Service Office of International Affairs ,» co-écrit avec Jonathan Putnam.
En tant que coordinateur du programme patrimoine mondial du Bureau des affaires internationales, il apporte une expertise technique à la délégation américaine à la Convention du patrimoine mondial. À ce titre, il a siégé sur le Comité du patrimoine mondial de 2005 à 2009 et a assisté à presque toutes les réunions du Comité de 2003 jusqu’à nos jours. Son bureau coordonne également les propositions d’inscription des sites américains sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial et fournit des conseils à l’égard de la politique officielle des États-Unis pour le patrimoine mondial.
Les extraits audio suivants sont issus d’une entrevue menée avec Stephen Morris par Christina Cameron au 24 avril 2019 à Springfield, Virginie. Stephen Morris applaudit la prise de conscience vis-à-vis des lieux menacés que suscite la popularité de la Convention, mais déplore le manque de financement pour la conservation des sites du patrimoine mondial. Il s’inquiète également des répercussions de la croissance exponentielle des inscriptions sur la crédibilité de la Liste du patrimoine mondial et sur le travail des organes consultatifs et du Centre du patrimoine mondial.Stephen Morris has been Head of the Office of International Affairs at the United States National Park Service (NPS) since 2004. He holds a Bachelor of Liberal Arts from Oberlin College and a Masters in Urban Planning with a specialization in historical preservation from George Washington University. He has held various positions with the NPS in the past 30 years, having started his career as a specialist in historical preservation at the National Register of Historic Places. He also managed the NPS Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance program before becoming head of the World Heritage program in 2002. In 2011, he was guest editor for the 28th volume of the George Wright Forum, in which we can read his article "Linking NPS to the World: The Role of the National Park Service Office of International Affairs," co-written with Jonathan Putnam.
As coordinator of the World Heritage program at the Office of International Affairs, he provides technical expertise for the American delegation to the World Heritage Convention. In this capacity, he served on the World Heritage Committee from 2005 to 2009 and attended almost all meetings of the Committee from 2003 to the present. His office also coordinates nominations for American sites to the World Heritage List and provides advice on official United States policy for World Heritage.
The following audio clips are from an interview with Stephen Morris by Christina Cameron on 24 April 2019 in Springfield, Virginia. Stephen Morris applauds the awareness of the endangered places that the popularity of the Convention is raising, but deplores the lack of funding for the conservation of World Heritage sites. He is also concerned about the repercussions of the exponential growth of inscriptions on the credibility of the World Heritage List and on the work of the advisory bodies and the World Heritage Centre.1. La Convention du patrimoine mondial ; a. Implication de Stephen Morris dans le patrimoine mondial ; b. Objectifs clés de la Convention du patrimoine mondial ; c. Programme de réformes à Cairns ; d. Décisions ayant influencé la mise en œuvre de la Convention ; e. Réussites et échecs de la Convention ; 2. Le Comité du patrimoine mondial et l’Assemblée générale des États parties ; 3. La performance des organisations consultatives : l’ICOMOS ; 4. Le Centre du patrimoine mondial ; 5. L’engagement des États parties ; 6. La destruction intentionnelle du patrimoine mondial
7. Le rôle de la société civil
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Archives orales de la Convention du patrimoine mondial : entrevue menée avec Stephen Morris par Christina Cameron
No full text1. La Convention du patrimoine mondial ; a. Implication de Stephen Morris dans le patrimoine mondial ; b. Objectifs clés de la Convention du patrimoine mondial ; c. Programme de réformes à Cairns ; d. Décisions ayant influencé la mise en œuvre de la Convention ; e. Réussites et échecs de la Convention ; 2. Le Comité du patrimoine mondial et l’Assemblée générale des États parties ; 3. La performance des organisations consultatives : l’ICOMOS ; 4. Le Centre du patrimoine mondial ; 5. L’engagement des États parties ; 6. La destruction intentionnelle du patrimoine mondial
7. Le rôle de la société civileStephen Morris est chef du Bureau des affaires internationales au National Park Service (NPS) des États-Unis depuis 2004. Il détient un baccalauréat en arts libéraux de l’Oberlin College et une maîtrise en planification urbaine avec spécialisation en préservation historique de l’Université George Washington. Il a occupé différents postes au sein du NPS dans les 30 dernières années, ayant débuté sa carrière comme spécialiste en préservation historique au Registre national des lieux historiques. Il a également été chef de programme pour le programme d’assistance « Rivers, Trails and Conservation » du NPS avant de devenir responsable du programme du patrimoine mondial en 2002. En 2011, il a été rédacteur invité pour le 28e volume du George Wright Forum, au sein duquel on peut lire son article « Linking NPS to the World: The Role of the National Park Service Office of International Affairs ,» co-écrit avec Jonathan Putnam.
En tant que coordinateur du programme patrimoine mondial du Bureau des affaires internationales, il apporte une expertise technique à la délégation américaine à la Convention du patrimoine mondial. À ce titre, il a siégé sur le Comité du patrimoine mondial de 2005 à 2009 et a assisté à presque toutes les réunions du Comité de 2003 jusqu’à nos jours. Son bureau coordonne également les propositions d’inscription des sites américains sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial et fournit des conseils à l’égard de la politique officielle des États-Unis pour le patrimoine mondial.
Les extraits audio suivants sont issus d’une entrevue menée avec Stephen Morris par Christina Cameron au 24 avril 2019 à Springfield, Virginie. Stephen Morris applaudit la prise de conscience vis-à-vis des lieux menacés que suscite la popularité de la Convention, mais déplore le manque de financement pour la conservation des sites du patrimoine mondial. Il s’inquiète également des répercussions de la croissance exponentielle des inscriptions sur la crédibilité de la Liste du patrimoine mondial et sur le travail des organes consultatifs et du Centre du patrimoine mondial.Stephen Morris has been Head of the Office of International Affairs at the United States National Park Service (NPS) since 2004. He holds a Bachelor of Liberal Arts from Oberlin College and a Masters in Urban Planning with a specialization in historical preservation from George Washington University. He has held various positions with the NPS in the past 30 years, having started his career as a specialist in historical preservation at the National Register of Historic Places. He also managed the NPS Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance program before becoming head of the World Heritage program in 2002. In 2011, he was guest editor for the 28th volume of the George Wright Forum, in which we can read his article "Linking NPS to the World: The Role of the National Park Service Office of International Affairs," co-written with Jonathan Putnam.
As coordinator of the World Heritage program at the Office of International Affairs, he provides technical expertise for the American delegation to the World Heritage Convention. In this capacity, he served on the World Heritage Committee from 2005 to 2009 and attended almost all meetings of the Committee from 2003 to the present. His office also coordinates nominations for American sites to the World Heritage List and provides advice on official United States policy for World Heritage.
The following audio clips are from an interview with Stephen Morris by Christina Cameron on 24 April 2019 in Springfield, Virginia. Stephen Morris applauds the awareness of the endangered places that the popularity of the Convention is raising, but deplores the lack of funding for the conservation of World Heritage sites. He is also concerned about the repercussions of the exponential growth of inscriptions on the credibility of the World Heritage List and on the work of the advisory bodies and the World Heritage Centre
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
