1,721,312 research outputs found

    Stephen Harrison interview, 05 September 2008

    No full text
    Stephen Harrison, curator of Decorative Art & Design at the Cleveland Museum of Art, discusses the career of influential artist and designer, Victor Schrekengost. Harrison reflects on Schrekengost\u27s artistic contributions in Cleveland and beyond

    Stephen Harrison interview, 05 September 2008

    No full text
    Stephen Harrison, curator of Decorative Art & Design at the Cleveland Museum of Art, discusses the career of influential artist and designer, Victor Schrekengost. Harrison reflects on Schrekengost\u27s artistic contributions in Cleveland and beyond

    Stephen Harrison (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Horace, 2007

    No full text
    Tordeur Pol. Stephen Harrison (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Horace, 2007. In: L'antiquité classique, Tome 77, 2008. pp. 444-445

    Simon Swain, Stephen Harrison & Jás Elsner (Ed.), Severan Culture, 2007

    No full text
    Molinier-Arbo Agnès. Simon Swain, Stephen Harrison & Jás Elsner (Ed.), Severan Culture, 2007. In: L'antiquité classique, Tome 78, 2009. pp. 349-351

    Stephen HARRISON, Michael PASCHALIS, Stavros FRANGOULIDIS (Ed.), Metaphor and the Ancient Novel.

    No full text
    Donnet Daniel. Stephen HARRISON, Michael PASCHALIS, Stavros FRANGOULIDIS (Ed.), Metaphor and the Ancient Novel.. In: L'antiquité classique, Tome 76, 2007. pp. 268-272

    Stephen HARRISON, Michael PASCHALIS, Stavros FRANGOULIDIS (Ed.), Metaphor and the Ancient Novel.

    No full text
    Donnet Daniel. Stephen HARRISON, Michael PASCHALIS, Stavros FRANGOULIDIS (Ed.), Metaphor and the Ancient Novel.. In: L'antiquité classique, Tome 76, 2007. pp. 268-272

    SEVERAN CULTURE, Edited by Simon Swain, Stephen Harrison, Jaś Elsner, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2007, 569 str., 117

    Get PDF
    Prikaz knjige SEVERAN CULTURE, Edited by Simon Swain, Stephen Harrison, Jaś Elsner, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2007, 569 str., 117 crno-bijelih ilustracija (fotografije, crteži, table, karte), popis literature (str. 512-560), indeks (str. 561-569)

    Kingship and Empire under the Achaemenids, Alexander the Great and the Early Seleucids

    No full text
    This book offers the first systematic, comparative analysis of the ideology of kingship and empire under the Achaemenids, Alexander the Great and the early Seleucids. It explores key issues thematically such as legitimation, representations of empire and royal space. Through this method, Stephen Harrison breaks traditional periodisation offering new insights into long-term trends. The book challenges existing narratives about the relationship between the Achaemenids and their successors.Rather than focusing on the mere facts of continuity and change, the study advocates for a more complex understanding of the Achaemenids’ impact on monarchical ideology under Alexander and the Seleucids. Harrison's comparative approach brings the three empires into dialogue with one another and thus treats them all equally through this lens. The methodology highlights the uniqueness of particular strategies deployed by different rulers and isolate ideas which were distinctively ‘Achaemenid’, ‘Alexandrine’ or ‘Seleucid’ as opposed merely to identifying monarchical commonalities

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore