1,721,021 research outputs found
Deterministic non-adaptive contention resolution on a shared channel
In a multiple access channel, autonomous stations are able to transmit and listen to a shared device. A fundamental problem, called contention resolution, is to allow any station to successfully deliver its message by resolving the conflicts that arise when several stations transmit simultaneously. Despite a long history on such a problem, most of the results deal with the static setting when all stations start simultaneously, while many fundamental questions remain open in the realistic scenario when stations can join the channel at arbitrary times. In this paper, we explore the impact that three major channel features (asynchrony among stations, knowledge of the number of contenders and possibility of switching off stations after a successful transmission) can have on the time complexity of non-adaptive deterministic algorithms. We establish upper and lower bounds allowing to understand which parameters permit time-efficient contention resolution and which do not.(c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Deterministic Contention Resolution without Collision Detection: Throughput vs Energy
This paper studies the Contention resolution problem on a shared channel (also known as a multiple access channel). A set of n stations are connected to a common device and are able to communicate by transmitting and listening. Each station may have a message to broadcast. At any round, a transmission is successful if and only if exactly one station is transmitting at that round. Simultaneous transmissions interfere one another and, as a result, the respective messages are lost. The Contention resolution is the fundamental problem of scheduling the transmissions into rounds in such a way that any station delivers successfully its message on the channel.We consider a general dynamic distributed setting. We assume that the stations can join (or be activated on) the channel at arbitrary times (dynamic scenario). This has to be contrasted with the simplified static scenario, in which all stations are assumed to be activated simultaneously. We also assume that the stations are not able to detect whether a collision among simultaneous transmissions occurred (model without collision detection). Finally, there is no global clock in the system: each station measures the time using its own local clock which starts when the station is activated and is possibly out of sync with respect to the other stations.We study non-adaptive deterministic distributed algorithms for the contention resolution problem and assess their efficiency both in terms of channel utilization (also called throughput) and energy consumption.While this topic has been quite extensively examined for randomized algorithms, this is, to the best of our knowledge, the first paper to discuss to which extent deterministic contention resolution algorithms can be efficient in terms of both channel utilization and energy consumption.Our results imply an exponential separation gap between static and dynamic setting with respect to channel utilization. We also show that the knowledge of the number of participating stations k (or an upper bound on it) has a substantial impact on the energy consumption
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
