1,721,962 research outputs found

    Smith Kenneth.- The Malthusien Controversy

    No full text
    Sauvy Alfred. Smith Kenneth.- The Malthusien Controversy. In: Population, 8ᵉ année, n°1, 1953. p. 166

    Invitations to Write: Declined -- 1946-57 -- Correspondence, Miscellaneous -- letter, 1956-11-17

    No full text
    Letter from Smith, Kenneth M. to Sabin, Albert B. dated 1956-11-17.Sabin Collection Fair Use Policy</a

    Invitations to Write: Declined -- 1946-57 -- Correspondence, Miscellaneous -- letter, 1955-10-18

    No full text
    Letter from Smith, Kenneth M. to Sabin, Albert B. dated 1955-10-18.Sabin Collection Fair Use Policy</a

    Alien Registration- Smith, Kenneth (Augusta, Kennebec County)

    Full text link
    https://digitalmaine.com/alien_docs/17373/thumbnail.jp

    Alien Registration- Smith, Kenneth (Andover, Oxford County)

    Full text link
    https://digitalmaine.com/alien_docs/12547/thumbnail.jp

    Hylson-Smith (Kenneth) Evangelicals in the Church of England, 1734-1984

    No full text
    Séguy Jean. Hylson-Smith (Kenneth) Evangelicals in the Church of England, 1734-1984. In: Archives de sciences sociales des religions, n°74, 1991. pp. 256-257

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore