19,642 research outputs found
Letter from Daniel F. Goggin, May 1, 1948
No full textThis letter confirms that Tsugitada Kanamori worked for Daniel Goggin in an Ordnance Shop as the superintendent at the Yokohama Area Engineer Equipment Pool. Mr. Goggin explains that Kanamori is "invaluable"and he would absolutely recommend Mr. Kanamori for any position.This collection contains one box of documents belonging to Tsugitada Kanamori. Materials in this collection mostly pertain to Kanamori’s efforts regarding canceling his renunciation and reinstating his American citizenship
Inserção da educação sanitária e ambiental no ensino fundamental
Get PDFDissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro Tecnológico. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia AmbientalEsta Dissertação de Mestrado tem como principal foco tanto a pesquisa sobre a inserção da educação Sanitária e Ambiental no ensino fundamental, como a aplicação de uma metodologia - o PEDS - baseada na teoria da autopoiésis de Maturana e Varela e desenvolvida inicialmente para organizações públicas. A metodologia utilizada para a aplicação dos conceitos específicos do PEDS - Planejamento Estratégico de Desenvolvimento Sustentável - sofreu uma adequação de linguagem e uma adaptação em função da faixa etária dos participantes, alunos de quinta série, com uma média de idade de onze anos. O Modelo cognitivo desenvolvido pelo Professor Dr. Daniel José da Silva, que se utiliza de uma pedagogia construtivista para a apreensão de conceitos e estratégias, mostrou-se extremamente adequado para a construção de conhecimentos, em sala de aula, na faixa etária pesquisada
Dimorphandra macrostachya subsp. glabrifolia M. F. Silva
No full text[782] Dimorphandra macrostachya Benth. subsp. glabrifolia (Ducke) M.F.Silva Fl. Neotrop. Monogr. 44: 106 [2 Oct. 1986] (Silva 1986). Dimorphandra glabrifolia Ducke, J.Wash. Acad. Sci. 25: 196 (Ducke 1935). HERBARIUM DATA (FG). — A single collection, S.A. Mori et al. 21691. SIZE. — Up to 41 m tall (Barneby & Heald 2002).Published as part of Molino, Jean-François, Sabatier, Daniel, Grenand, Pierre, Engel, Julien, Frame, Dawn, Delprete, Piero G., Fleury, Marie, Odonne, Guillaume, Davy, Damien, Lucas, Eve J. & Martin, Claire A., 2022, An annotated checklist of the tree species of French Guiana, including vernacular nomenclature, pp. 345-903 in Adansonia (3) (3) 44 (26) on page 512, DOI: 10.5252/adansonia2022v44a26, http://zenodo.org/record/745877
Modelo não linear de viga para a obtenção de esforços em serviço aplicado a lajes de barragem de enrocamento com face de concreto
Get PDFDissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro Tecnológico, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Civil, Florianópolis, 2009Em projetos estruturais, a determinação das solicitações para a verificação dos Estados Limites de Serviço é feita usualmente, com uma análise elástico-linear. Porém, pode ser que ocorram pequenas redistribuições de esforços mesmo em condições de utilização, devido à fissuração das seções mais solicitadas, principalmente no caso de peças dimensionadas com redistribuição de esforços. Neste caso, seria recomendável uma análise não linear para a determinação dos esforços solicitantes em serviço. Contudo, estas análises são geralmente complexas, necessitando certo grau de conhecimento teórico pelo projetista e modelos que exigem tempos de processamento computacional relativamente elevados, dificultando assim o seu uso em projetos usuais. Este trabalho tem por objetivo desenvolver um procedimento simplificado para a determinação dos esforços solicitantes em elementos sob condições de serviço, onde são utilizados diagramas momento curvatura para a consideração da não-linearidade dos materiais. Foi desenvolvido um programa computacional como forma de automatizar o processo iterativo que envolvem essas análises. Foram implementados no programa três tipos de diagramas momento-curvatura para se levar em conta a contribuição do concreto entre fissuras, o primeiro deles indicado pela NBR6118 proposto por Branson, o segundo retirado do CEB-FIP Model Code e o terceiro um diagrama bilinear simplificado. Foram estudados inicialmente exemplos de vigas contínuas, averiguando se há redistribuição de esforços em serviço, comparando os resultados obtidos pelos três diferentes diagramas com os resultados usuais de uma análise elástico-linear.O mesmo procedimento, com pequenas alterações, foi utilizado para o estudo de lajes de barragens de enrocamento com face de concreto, onde exercem função de vedação. Essas lajes possuem um comportamento pouco usual, já que pouco contribuem para a resistência da estrutura, estando praticamente submetidas a deslocamentos impostos.In structural design, the verification of serviceability limit states is usually done, by means of a linear-elastic analysis. However, small redistributions may occur, even under service conditions, due to cracking in the sections subjected to highest action effects, particularly in the case of structures designed with redistribution. In this case, is recommended a nonlinear analysis to determine the solicitations in service. Nevertheless, these analyses are usually complex, requiring some theoretical knowledge by the designer and models that require high computational processing time, making it difficult for use in regular projects. This work has the purpose to develop a simplified procedure to determine member efforts under service loads, where moment curvature diagrams are used to account for material nonlinearities. A computer program was developed as a way to automate the iterative process involving the analysis. To take into account the contribution of concrete between cracks, three types of momentcurvature diagrams were implemented. The first one indicated by NBR6118, as proposed by Branson; the second one taken from the CEB-FIP Model Code; and the third one is a simplified bi-linear diagram. Examples of continuous beams were initially studied, by checking if there is bending redistribution under service, and then comparing the results obtained by using the three different diagrams with the usual results of a linear-elastic analysis. The same procedure, with minor modifications, was used to study slabs of concrete face rockfill dams, where they exert sealing function. These slabs have an unusual behavior, since they provide a little contribution to the resistance of the structure, being subjected to imposed displacements
Translation technique and textual studies in the Old Greek and Theodotion versions of Daniel.
Get PDFThis thesis focuses on two separate, but related areas: the analysis of translation technique and the Greek texts of Daniel. Foremost in the research of Translation Technique (TT) in the Septuagint is the need for a model that is appropriate for the analysis of different ancient languages. In recent years there has been an increasing emphasis on the features of literalism in a translation, but it is argued in this thesis that the focus on literalism is inadequate as a methodology for the analysis of TT. The contention of this thesis is that the analysis of TT should incorporate insights from modem linguistic research. Therefore, the main purpose of this thesis is to develop and apply such a model to the Old Greek (CG) and Theodotion (Th)versions of Daniel. The existence of two complete Greek versions of the book of Daniel that are closely related to the same Vorlage (at least in chapters 1-3 and 7-12), furnish ideal examples for the application of the methodology. Unfortunately, it is no straightforward matter to employ the OG of Daniel, because the available critical edition can no longer be regarded as reliable. The most important witness to the OG version of Daniel is Papyrus 967, and large portions of this manuscript have been published since the appearance of the critical edition of the OG of Daniel in 1954. Therefore, in order to analyze and compare the two Greek texts of Daniel, it is necessary to evaluate all of the variants of Papyrus 967 in order to establish a preliminary critical text of OG. Once a critical text is established the proposed methodology for translation technique is applied to selected passages in the OG and Th versions of Daniel. An analysis and comparison of TT in OG and Th makes it possible to: 1) characterize the TT employed by OG and Th in detail; 2) determine Th's relationship to OG, i.e. is it a revision or independent translation; 3) demonstrate how the Greek texts can be employed effectively for textual criticism of the Hebrew Bible. On the basis of the analysis of Th's text it is also possible to determine Th's relationship to the body of works, which exhibit a close formal correspondence to the Masoretic text, known as Kaige-Theodotion
Melanesiandra solomonensis Santos-Silva & Heffern & Matsuda 2010
No full textMelanesiandra solomonensis (Arigony, 1983) (Fig. 24, 25, 83, 136, 137, 223, 266, 327, 379-381) Parandra solomonensis Arigony, 1983: 40, fig. 1-18; 1984: 89, 94, 95, 96, 97, 111, 115, fig. 51, 63-66; Santos-Silva 2002: 32 (note). Birandra (Birandra) solomonensis; Santos-Silva and Shute 2009: 32. Description. Integument shining, dark-brown; anterior edge of head, parts of mandibles, lateral edges of pronotum and of scutellum, and elytral suture blackish or very dark-brown. Male (Fig. 379). Head wide, proportionally very large in relation to body size; gibbosities of dorsal surface with punctures coarse, abundant and not confluent; area between gibbosities and ocular carina smooth; area near ocular posterior edge and of occiput with coarse punctation; area behind eyes with punctures very coarse, abundant, in part confluent. Central region of clypeus strongly convex together with labrum. Central projection of labrum (Fig. 24), very distinct, wide, and with one small projection on each side. Eyes (Fig. 83) emarginate. Mandibles (Fig. 136) falciform, as long as or just shorter than head; inner margin with two large teeth together protracted. Submentum clearly delimited by fine suture; surface coarsely and abundantly punctate; margin close to mentum wide and barely elevated; pilosity moderately short and very sparse. Antennae not notably short (reaching basal fourth of pronotum); ventral sensorial area of antennae (Fig. 223) visible from side only in apical antennomeres; ventral sensorial area of antennomeres III-V not divided by carina; remaining antennomeres divided by carina gradually more elevated towards antennomere XI; dorsal sensorial area of antennomere XI large. Pronotum convex; disc punctation fine and sparse, gradually coarser laterally (mainly towards anterior angles); anterior margin concave; anterior angles not projected forward; lateral angles well marked, rounded or obtuse; posterior angle well marked. Elytra finely and abundantly punctate (punctures just coarser laterally); elytral carinae absent. Metasternum with some coarse punctures. Metafemur (Fig. 380) moderately short. Metatarsus (without claws) (Fig. 266) longer than metatibia; metatarsomere V longer than I-III together. Female (Fig. 381). Dorsal surface of head and area behind eyes with same kind of punctuation as in males, except sparser. Central projection of labrum (Fig. 25) narrow and rounded or subacute, without lateral projections. Mandibles as in Fig. 137. Variability. Integument brown to dark-brown. Males: dorsal surface of head, between gibbosities and ocular carina, with some fine punctures; submentum clearly delimited by fine suture just laterally; antennae notably short (reaching the basal third of pronotum); antennomeres III-VI or III-VII not divided by carina; elytral punctures fine; elytral carinae barely visible. Dimensions in mm (M / F). Total length (including mandibles), 16.8-20.5/17.7-20.0; prothorax: length, 3.4-4.3/3.5-4.2; anterior width, 4.5-5.5/4.4-4.8; posterior width, 3.6-4.3/4.1-4.6; humeral width, 4.4-5.4/ 5.0-5.7; elytral length, 9.4-11.3/10.3-11.9. Geographical distribution (Fig. 327). Solomon Islands (Santa Ana Island, Santa Isabel Island). Material examined. (6 M, 4 F), as follows: SOLOMON ISLANDS. Isabel: Santa Isabel Island (Molao), paratype F, VI.29.1960, C. W. O’Brien coll. (MCNZ). Makira-Ulawa: Santa Ana Island, 2 paratypes M, 1 paratype F, [no date indicated] (MCNZ); 3 M, 2 F [no date indicated] (USNM); M, [no date indicated] (MZSP); paratype F, [no date indicated] (MZSP). Types, type locality. Holotype M, from Solomon Islands, Santa Ana Island, deposited at SMTD. Arigony (1983) stated that the material examined from the Solomon Islands included two pairs (deposited at the Museu de Ciências Naturais da FundaÇÃo Zoobotânica [MCN], Porto Alegre), the holotype and some paratypes (from Staaliches Mueum für Tierkunde [SMTD] Dresden), and the other paratypes at Bernice P. Bishop Museum (BPBM), Honolulu and Smithisonian Institution – United States National Museum (USNM), Washington. However, in the list of type material she listed: holotype at SMTD; 3 M and 2 F at MCN (paratypes), therefore, 5 paratypes and not two pairs; 3 M and 4 F at SMTD (paratypes); 1 F at BPBM. Therefore, there are not any types deposited at USNM, and there are five paratypes deposited at MCNZ (= MCN). Besides, one of the paratypes (female) deposited at MCNZ is not from Santa Ana Island, but from Santa Isabel Island, and the paratypes are 2 M and 3 F, not 3 M and 2 F. The number of males and females deposited at MCNZ was clearly an error, because Arigony (op.cit.) wrote in the list of type material: “3 [male symbol] MCN 56502, 56503, 2 [female symbol] MCN 56501, 56504, 61212”. We received all specimens of Parandrinae from the Oriental province deposited at USNM, among which, there are specimens of M. solomonensis, but none of them have a type label. Additionally, even if one of those specimens had a type label, it would not be a type, because it was not recorded in the list of type material. One paratype female originally deposited at MCNZ is currently deposited at MZSP (donation of Dr. Maria Helena Galileo). We concluded that the paratype female from Santa Isabel Island belongs to BPBM, and was forgotten in MCNZ by Tania Arigony. Dr. Maria Helena Galileo (MCNZ) authorized us to return the paratype to BPBM. This paratype from Santa Isabel Island was collected on VI.29.1960, and not VI.24.1960, as written by Arigony (1983). Additionally, this paratype has the number 61212, the same number listed by Arigony (1983) as a female from Santa Ana Island, deposited at MCNZ. The most important problem, related to the “ paratype ” from Santa Isabel Island, is that the specimen is not a female of M. solomonensis, but a female of M. bougainvillensis. Comments. Although the general appearance of the males of M. solomonensis (Fig. 379) is very different from that of M. striatifrons (Fig. 376), the females of both species are very similar, mainly in head shape.Published as part of Santos-Silva, Antonio, Heffern, Daniel & Matsuda, Kiyoshi, 2010, Revision of Hawaiian, Australasian, Oriental, and Japanese Parandrinae (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae), pp. 1-120 in Insecta Mundi 2010 (130) on pages 45-47, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.516448
Storeyandra frenchi Santos-Silva & Heffern & Matsuda 2010
No full text<i>Storeyandra frenchi</i> (Blackburn, 1895) <p>(Fig. 16, 17, 76, 124, 125, 202, 217, 260, 321, 355-359)</p> <p> <i>Parandra Frenchi</i> Blackburn, 1895: 57; Lameere 1902: 95.</p> <p> <i>Parandra frenchi</i>; Lea 1919: 260 (plate XXVII, fig. 91, 92); Illidge 1924: 78; Duffy 1963: 31; Hawkeswood 1992: 208 (host); Webb 1994: 325-327 (distribution, host).</p> <p> <i>Parandra</i> (<i>Parandra</i>) <i>Frenchi</i>; Lameere 1913: 6 (cat.); 1919: 17.</p> <p> <i>Parandra</i> (<i>Parandra</i>) <i>frenchi</i>; Arigony 1984: 89, 90, 94, 95, 97, 98 (fig. 54, 63, 64, 65, 66); Santos-Silva 2002: 32 (note).</p> <p> <i>Birandra</i> (<i>Birandra</i>) <i>frenchi</i>; Santos-Silva and Shute 2009: 32.</p> <p> <b>Description</b>. Integument dark-brown; parts of head and mandibles blackish.</p> <p>Male (Fig. 355). Head and prothorax together longer than elytral length. Head proportionally very wide in relation to body length; dorsal surface slightly convex; punctures on gibbosities fine and abundant, clearly coarser and confluent towards eyes and occiput; area behind eyes coarsely and confluently punctate, except on protuberances where eyes are inserted, that are finer and sparsely punctate; area between gibbosities and ocular carina barely depressed; ocular carina (Fig. 355) not bifurcated in “Y”; pilosity microscopic and sparse between eyes, very short and sparse on protuberances where eyes are inserted. Eyes as in Fig. 76. Clypeus coarsely and confluently punctate; pilosity short, moderately sparse. Central projection of labrum (Fig. 16) with short, moderately abundant hair. Submentum with transverse and wide carinae; punctures coarse, oblong, deep and confluent in central region, and clearly finer towards mentum; pilosity moderately long and sparse; margin close to mentum just elevated. Antennae (Fig. 217) reaching apical fourth of pronotum; dorsal sensorial area of antennomere XI divided by carina at its apical third. Maxillary palp as in Fig. 202.</p> <p>Pronotum finely, abundantly punctate in central area, with punctures somewhat coarser and sparser laterally. Elytra with punctures sparse and barely fine on anterior two-thirds, and fine on apical third; each elytron with shallow depression, longitudinal, that begins at basal fourth and finishes just after middle of elytron. Femora (Fig. 356) short and wide. Metatarsus (without claws) (Fig. 260) shorter than metatibia; metatarsomere V shorter than I-III together.</p> <p>Female (Fig. 357). Punctures and pilosity on dorsal surface of head and of clypeus as in male. Punctures of pronotum as in male. Elytral punctures fine and abundant towards the suture, and coarser laterally. Submentum coarsely and abundantly punctate; anterior margin as in males.</p> <p> <b>Variability</b>. Integument brown to dark-brown; margins of pronotum blackish. Male: punctures on gibbosities of dorsal face of head rather fine and not notably abundant; labrum with short hair, moderately punctate throughout extension; submentum with transverse carinae only laterally; antennae reaching only to middle of pronotum; sensorial dorsal area of antennomere XI not divided by carina; elytra with fine punctures throughout length, but more abundant on apical third.</p> <p> <b>Dimensions in mm (M / F)</b>. Total length (including mandibles), 15.0-25.3/13.5-22.4; prothorax: length, 3.7-6.2/2.8-4.7; anterior width, 4.8-8.4/3.0-4.9; posterior width, 3.6-6.0/3.0-4.8; humeral width, 4.1-6.8/ 3.8-6.0; elytral length, 7.2-11.7/8.5-13.8.</p> <p> <b>Geographical distribution</b> (Fig. 321). Australia (Queensland, New South Wales).</p> <p> <b>Material examined</b>. (11 M, 21 F), as follows: AUSTRALIA. F, 1878, Deyrolle coll. (MCGD); 2 F, [date not indicated] (IRSN). <i>New South Wales</i>: F, XII.10.1923, W. W. Froggatt coll. (AUMU); Cascade, F, [date not indicated] (AUMU); M, F, I.1934, F. E. Wilson coll. (MZSP); F, I.1934, F. E. Wilson coll. (AUMU); 4 F, I.1934, F. E. Wilson coll. (MVMA); Condong (Tweed River), M, [date not indicated], Brown coll. (MVMA); Dorrigo, M (ex. Tippmann Collection), [date not indicated] (USNM); M, [date not indicated] (AUMU); 2 M, [date not indicated], W. Heron coll. (AUMU); M, F, [date not indicated] (MVMA); M, F, [date not indicated], W. Heron coll. (MVMA); M, F, I.1931, C. Oke coll. (MVMA); Sydney, F, XI.03.1923, W. W. Froggatt coll. (AUMU); Ulong, M, [date not indicated], W. Heron coll. (MVMA). <i>Queensland</i>: Mount Bithongabel, F, XII.1963, F. T. Fricke coll. (AUMU); Mountains Bunya, F, XII.14.1937, N. Geary coll. (AUMU); F, XII.15.1937, N. Geary coll. (AUMU); 2 F, XII.21.1937, N. Geary coll. (AUMU); F, II.07.1961, D. K. McAlpine coll. (AUMU); N. Queensland, M, III.02.1905, (MVMA).</p> <p> <b>Type, type locality.</b> Holotype F, from Australia, Queensland. Dr. Peter Lillywhite (Senior Collection Manager, Entomology / Arachnology Sciences Department) sent us photographs of a female (Fig. 358) identified as the holotype of <i>Parandra frenchi</i> Blackburn, 1895, deposited at MVMA. Among those photographs is one with the labels (Fig. 359). One of those labels, not handwritten, refers to locality of collection: “Endeavour River”. That river is in Queensland and not in New South Wales. Blackburn (1895) wrote: “N.S. Wales; in the collection of Mr. French”. Lillywhite (pers. comm.) explained: “Charles French (Sr) is quote as saying to Musgrave that he “did not take up the insects again until about 1860, when my friend, Tom Gulliver, late of Townsville, gave me a start.” I may be drawing a long bow but Queensland was a part of NSW up until 1859. As Townsville is also in what is now North Queensland it is possible that French was collecting there around the time that Statehood was conferred. He would have labeled his material in his collection at the time as NSW. We received this collection in 1908, after the date of Blackburn’s publishing of the species. The Queensland on the photograph may have been a later addition. Please also note that this is the only <i>P. frenchi</i> we have from the collection of C. French”.</p>Published as part of <i>Santos-Silva, Antonio, Heffern, Daniel & Matsuda, Kiyoshi, 2010, Revision of Hawaiian, Australasian, Oriental, and Japanese Parandrinae (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae), pp. 1-120 in Insecta Mundi 2010 (130)</i> on pages 62-63, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5164485">10.5281/zenodo.5164485</a>
Identificação de plantas indesejadas em sementeiro de cornichão.
Get PDFResumo.Fernando Flores Cardoso, Daniel Portella Montardo, José Carlos Ferrugem Moraes, Marcos Flávio Silva Borba, Sandro da Silva Camargo, editores técnicos
FIGURE 2 in A new species of Chironius Fitzinger, 1826 from the state of Bahia, Northeastern Brazil (Serpentes: Colubridae)
No full textFIGURE 2. Color pattern variation in preservative (alcohol 70%) of adult male (A–F, paratype MZUSP 7804, SVL 640 mm, TL 371 mm), and adult female (G–H, paratype MZUSP 7805, SVL 504 mm, TL 306 mm) of Chironius diamantina.Published as part of Fernandes, Daniel Silva & Hamdan, Breno, 2014, A new species of Chironius Fitzinger, 1826 from the state of Bahia, Northeastern Brazil (Serpentes: Colubridae), pp. 563-575 in Zootaxa 3881 (6) on page 567, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3881.6.5, http://zenodo.org/record/22652
Avaliação da umidade de sementes de cevadilha vacariana.
Get PDFResumo.Fernando Flores Cardoso, Daniel Portella Montardo, José Carlos Ferrugem Moraes, Marcos Flávio Silva Borba, Sandro da Silva Camargo, editores técnicos
- …
