914 research outputs found

    EPISTIMOLOGI KRITISISME IMMANUEL KANT

    No full text
    This research is motivated by Immanuel Kant's tho This research is motivated by Immanuel Kant's thoughts regarding his efforts to reconcile the prolonged conflict of rationalism and empiricism groups, which in the future Kant's thinking became the forerunner of the initial foothold of the thinkers after him. The research method that the author uses is qualitative with a library research approach. The data collection technique in this study is a documentation technique, namely by collecting important data files that support research. The result of this research is that Immanuel Kant's criticism, philosophy of criticism is a combination of rationalism and empiricism. This school of criticism is also known as Kant's criticism, because Kant was the first to criticize and analyze the two sources of knowledge and combine them. During his 80 years (w. 1804)  of life, Kant produced many works, including: (1) his 1781 essay on a critique of pure reason. (2) 1788 his essay on the critique of the ratio of practice. (3) 1790 his essay on the critique of the ratio of judgment/judgment, and Immanuel Kant's Epistemology of criticism, Immanuel Kant's thoughts in the field of epistemology are fully devoted in his work entitled “Critique of Pure Reason”. Kant's thoughts inspired many philosophers after him to present the idea of ​​human knowledge. ughts regarding his efforts to reconcile the prolonged conflict of rationalism and empiricism groups, which in the future Kant's thinking became the forerunner of the initial foothold of the thinkers after him. The research method that the author uses is qualitative with a library research approach. The data collection technique in this study is a documentation technique, namely by collecting important data files that support research, both primary sources such as the book Characters of Philosophers and the Golden Era of Philosophy by Nurnaningsih Nawawi as well as other secondary sources that support the topic of discussion. The result of this research is that Immanuel Kant's criticism, philosophy of criticism is a combination of rationalism and empiricism. This school of criticism is also known as Kant's criticism, because Kant was the first to criticize and analyze the two sources of knowledge and combine them. Then, Immanuel Kant, Flashes of Life and his major works, Immanuel Kant was born in Konigsberg, East Prussia (now Germany), on April 22, 1724. Born as the fourth of six children of his father, of Scottish descent. Her mother is of German descent. Kant's parents were saddle-makers and staunch followers of the Pietism movement. During his 80 (1804 w) years of life, Kant produced many works, including: (1) his 1781 essay on a critique of pure reason. (2) 1788 his essay on the critique of the ratio of practice. (3) 1790 his essay on the criticism of the ratio of judgment/judgment, and Immanuel Kant's Epistemology of criticism, Immanuel Kant's thoughts in the field of epistemology are fully devoted in his work entitled Critique of Pure Reason. Kant's thoughts inspired many philosophers after him to present the idea of ​​human knowledge.Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh pemikiran Immanuel Kant terkait usahanya untuk mendamaikan konflik berkepanjangan rasionalisme dan kelompok empirisme, yang dimana dikemudian hari pemikiran Kant menjadi cikal bakal pijakan awal dari para pemikir setelahnya. Metode penelitian yang penulis lakukan ialah kualitatif dengan pendekatan library research. Teknik pengumpulan data pada penelitian ini adalah teknik dokumentasi, yaitu dengan cara mengumpulkan data-data berkas penting yang menunjang penelitian baik sumber primer seperti buku Tokoh Filsuf dan Era Keemasan Filsafat karya Nurnaningsih Nawawi maupun sumber skunder lainnya yang menunjang terkait topik bahasan. Hasil penelitian ini bahwa kritisisme Immanuel Kant, filsafat kritisisme merupakan penggabungan antara rasionalisme dan empirisme. Aliran kritisisme ini dikenal pula sebagai kritisisme Kant, karena Kant sebagai penggagas pertama kali yang mengkritik dan menganalisis kedua macam sumber pengetahuan itu dan menggabungkan keduanya. Kemudian, Immanuel Kant, Kilasan Hidup dan Karya-karya utamanya, Immanuel Kant lahir di Konigsberg, Prussia Timur (sekarang Jerman), pada tanggal 22 April 1724. Lahir sebagai anak keempat dari enam bersaudara Ayahnya, berdarah Skotlandia. Ibunya, berdarah Jerman. Orang tua Kant adalah seorang pembuat pelana kuda dan penganut setia gerakan Pietisme. Selama 80 (1804 w) tahun hidup, Kant banyak melahirkan karya-karya di antaranya yaitu: (1) 1781 karangannya tentang kritik atas rasio murni. (2) 1788 karangannya tentang kritik atas rasio praktik. (3) 1790 karangannya tentang kritik atas rasio daya pertimbangan/putusan, dan Epistemologi kritisisme Immanuel Kant, pemikiran Immanuel Kant dalam bidang epistemologi sepenuhnya tercurah dalam karyanya yang berjudul Critique of Pure Reason. Pemikiran Kant tersebut menginspirasi banyak filsuf setelahnya untuk menyajikan gagasan tentang pengetahuan manusia

    “Kant’s theory of politics” in “existential liberalism” of Gerhardt

    No full text
    This article focuses on the interpretation of Immanuel Kant’s political views in V. Gerhardt’s “existential liberalism”. The author considers the basic elements of the “theory of politics” presented in this interpretation, emphasises the components of interpretation per se and additional reception, and offers a critical analysis of certain conclusion from the general point of view of contemporary discussion on Kant’s political works

    Honoring A Giant: Immanuel Wallerstein And His Contributions to Social Sciences

    No full text
    As a salute to a preeminent social scholar of our times, Immanuel M. Wallerstein (1930-2019), this paper briefly highlights his biography, education, and academic career; however, it is mainly concerned with his scholarly concepts and theories. The author attempts to follow the development process of one of his main contributions to social sciences, the world-systems approach, as well as to analyze various important aspects of it, including its historic and philosophic significance. All efforts have been made to keep the paper informative yet also accessible and transparent, deferring, when appropriate, to Immanuel Wallerstein himself to expound his ideas to the reader

    Sobre la noción de experiencia en la Crítica a la Razón pura de Immanuel Kant

    No full text
    The article proposes an exploration of the notion of experience in Immanuel Kant's thought, taking as areference, mainly, the author's proposal in the Critique of Pure Reason. An attempt will be made toestablish an itinerary that can help follow the trail of this notion throughout the Critique, trying tobriefly develop the implications, both ontological and epistemological, that the author's conclusionsentail.El articulo se propone una exploración sobre la noción de experiencia en el pensamiento de Immanuel Kant, tomando como referencia, principalmente, la propuesta del autor en la Crítica de la Razón Pura. Se procurará establecer un itinerario que pueda ayudar a seguir el rastro de esta noción a lo largo de la Crítica, intentando desarrollar, brevemente, las implicaciones, tanto ontológicas como gnoseológicas, que conllevan las conclusiones del autor

    Sobre la noción de experiencia en la Crítica a la Razón pura de Immanuel Kant

    No full text
    The article proposes an exploration of the notion of experience in Immanuel Kant's thought, taking as areference, mainly, the author's proposal in the Critique of Pure Reason. An attempt will be made toestablish an itinerary that can help follow the trail of this notion throughout the Critique, trying tobriefly develop the implications, both ontological and epistemological, that the author's conclusionsentail.El articulo se propone una exploración sobre la noción de experiencia en el pensamiento de Immanuel Kant, tomando como referencia, principalmente, la propuesta del autor en la Crítica de la Razón Pura. Se procurará establecer un itinerario que pueda ayudar a seguir el rastro de esta noción a lo largo de la Crítica, intentando desarrollar, brevemente, las implicaciones, tanto ontológicas como gnoseológicas, que conllevan las conclusiones del autor

    El debate en torno a la economía política de: el moderno Sistema-Mundial

    No full text
    Este ensayo expone una sucinta pero profunda evaluación panorámica de la totalidad del debate suscitado en torno al magnum opus de Immanuel Wallerstein: El Moderno Sistema-Mundial. Una obra cuya trilogía ha sido traducida a más de 20 idiomas y que está por ampliarse con la publicación de su Vol. IV –aunque aquí el autor informa que el programa de su proyecto abarca hasta 7 volúmenes–. Wallerstein clasifica en tres tipos las críticas de que ha sido objeto: críticas principales, críticas mínimas y revisionismo sobre el análisis de los sistemas-mundo. Y se dedica a evaluar el impacto que ellas le propiciaron y las contestaciones que ha forjado para cada una. Construye un balance panorámico de la rica discusión desatada en torno a la que, sin duda, es una de las obras más relevantes en la historia de la ciencia histórico-social moderna.This essay presents a brief but thorough overview of the discussion about the Immanuel Wallerstein´s magnum opus: The Modern World-System. A work whose trilogy has been translated into over 20 languages and soon will be extended with the publication of Volume IV –though here the author reports that the program of his project includes up to 7 volumes. Wallerstein classified into three types the criticism that has been submitted his work: main criticism, minimum criticism and revisionism about the analysis of world-systems. He dedicates to evaluate the impact that they had it on him and replies that he prepared for each one. He builds a panoramic balance about the rich discussion unleashed around this work that, no doubt, is one of the most important in the history of modern social and historical science

    A comparative assessment of the innovation potential of the Baltic Sea region countries

    No full text
    This article offers a comparative assessment of the Baltic region countries on the basis of three groups of indicators — indicators of economic and research potential, indicators of dynamics of economic and research potential development, and indicators of economic and innovation potential of the states of the region. The author emphasises the need for Russia to cooperate with other countries of the region in the field of innovations as well as the possible role for the Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University in this process

    Sravnitel'naja ocenka innovacionnogo potenciala stran Baltijskogo regiona [A comparative assessment of the innovation potential of the Baltic Sea region countries]

    No full text
    This article offers a comparative assessment of the Baltic region countries on the basis of three groups of indicators — indicators of economic and research potential, indicators of dynamics of economic and research potential development, and indicators of economic and innovation potential of the states of the region. The author emphasises the need for Russia to cooperate with other countries of the region in the field of innovations as well as the possible role for the Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University in this process
    corecore