1,720,954 research outputs found
Analisis Rasch Model pada Instrumen Pre-Test Mahasiswa Program Studi Profesi Dokter Bagian Ilmu Kedokteran Forensik dan Medikolegal Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung
Pre-Test mahasiswa Program Studi Profesi Dokter (PSPD) di bagian Ilmu Kedokteran Forensik dan Medikolegal (IKFM) merupakan instrumen test pada tahap awal pendidikan. Pre-Test tersebut dikembangkan oleh staf pengajar bagian IKFM sebagai instrumen untuk mengetahui kemampuan mahasiswa dan mengenalkan hal-hal yang perlu diketahui pada proses pendidikan. Rasch model digunakan untuk menganalisis Pre-Test tersebut. Penggunaan Rasch model ditujukan untuk menguji validitas dan reliabilitas instrument Pre-Test. Metodologi yang digunakan adalah kuantitatif. Pre-Test menggunakan pilihan berganda terediri dari 3 pilihan. Sampel hasil Pre-Test terdiri dari 291 sampel. Hasil penelitian menunjukan Person measure = 0,37; Nilai Alpha Cronbach (mengukur reliabilitas) 0,74, menunjukan bagus; Person reliability 0.71, menunjukan cukup; Item reliability 0,99, menunjukan istimewa; Untuk person nilai INFIT MNSQ 0,99 dan OUTFIT MNSQ 1,06, menunjukan kualitas yang baik; Nilai separation person H= [(4x1,57) +1]/3 = 2,43, bermakna terdapat dua kelompok responden. Nilai separation item H= [(4xseparation) +1]/3=[(4x8.6) +1]/3= 11.8, bermakna terdapat 12 kelompok item. Berdasarkan Outfit MNSQ terdapat 1aitem yang misfit, yaitu n24. Instrumen Pre-test dapat disimpulkan baik dan dapat digunakan dengan modifikasi atau mengganti 1 aitem yang misfit
Gambaran Pengetahuan dan Keterampilan Dokter tentang Pengisian Penyebab Kematian Medis (Medical Cause of Death) Berdasarkan Standar ICD-10 di RS Tersier di Bandung
Penyebab kematian medis perlu dicantumkan pada setiap rekam medis pasien yang meninggal. Dokter di Rumah Sakit berperan penting dalam menentukan sebab kematian medis (medical cause of death). Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk menilai pengetahuan dan keterampilan dokter tentang cara penulisan penyebab kematian medis (medical cause of death) pada rekam medis di RS Tersier di Bandung yang sesuai dengan standar WHO International Classification of Disease (ICD) 10. Penelitian ini berupa studi deskriptif analitik dengan memberikan kuesioner pada dokter klinis di suatu RS Tersier di Bandung untuk menilai pengetahuan dan keterampilan dokter tentang cara penulisan penyebab kematian medis (medical cause of death) dan kesesuaiannya dengan standar WHO ICD-10. Dari total 928 orang dokter klinis, didapatkan 90 sampel. Sampel mewakili setiap departemen/bagian yang terlibat langsung pembuatan penyebab kematian medis di suatu RS Tersier di Bandung. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan 58,1% dokter yang memahami tentang cara penulisan penyebab kematian medis yang benar, sedangkan 41,9% belum memahami secara teori. Keterampilan dokter dalam mengisi penyebab kematian medis yang benar dan lengkap sebesar 20,7%, sedangkan 23,3% mengisi penyebab kematian medis dengan benar namun tidak lengkap. Sebanyak 75,4% mengisi penyebab kematian yang salah, terutama karena menuliskan kondisi akhir sebelum kematian (terminal events). Masih separuh dokter (58,1%) mengetahui cara penulisan penyebab kematian medis yang benar sesuai standar WHO ICD-10. Tingkat keterampilan dalam mengisi penyebab kematian medis yang lengkap, masih sangat rendah (20,7%)
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
