1,316 research outputs found
sj-pdf-1-srd-10.1177_23780231231171581 – Supplemental material for Unjust Income Inequality Prevails Across 29 Countries
No full textSupplemental material, sj-pdf-1-srd-10.1177_23780231231171581 for Unjust Income Inequality Prevails Across 29 Countries by Cristóbal Moya, Jule Adriaans and Carsten Sauer in Socius</p
sj-pdf-1-spq-10.1177_01902725231151671 – Supplemental material for Pay Justice and Pay Satisfaction: The Influence of Reciprocity, Social Comparisons, and Standard of Living
No full textSupplemental material, sj-pdf-1-spq-10.1177_01902725231151671 for Pay Justice and Pay Satisfaction: The Influence of Reciprocity, Social Comparisons, and Standard of Living by Jule Adriaans, Carsten Sauer and Cristóbal Moya in Social Psychology Quarterly</p
sj-pptx-2-spq-10.1177_01902725231151671 – Supplemental material for Pay Justice and Pay Satisfaction: The Influence of Reciprocity, Social Comparisons, and Standard of Living
No full textSupplemental material, sj-pptx-2-spq-10.1177_01902725231151671 for Pay Justice and Pay Satisfaction: The Influence of Reciprocity, Social Comparisons, and Standard of Living by Jule Adriaans, Carsten Sauer and Cristóbal Moya in Social Psychology Quarterly</p
Single-Molecule STED Microscopy with Photostable Organic Fluorophores
No full textKasper R, Harke B, Forthmann C, Tinnefeld P, Hell SW, Sauer M. Single-Molecule STED Microscopy with Photostable Organic Fluorophores. SMALL. 2010;6(13):1379-1384
Designing Multi-Factorial Survey Experiments: Effects of Presentation Style (Text or Table), Answering Scales, and Vignette Order
No full textMulti-factorial survey experiments have become a well-established tool in social sciences as they combine experimental designs with advantages of heterogeneous respondent samples. This survey was conducted to investigate methods problems that can be related with different design features of factorial surveys. Three questions can be investigated: how to present vignettes (running text vs. table), how to measure responses (rating vs. open scale), and how to sort vignettes (random vs. extreme-cases-first, to prevent censored responses). Experiments were conducted in a 2 x 2 x 2 between-subject design with 408 university students rating decks à 20 vignettes. Results were published in Carsten Sauer, Katrin Auspurg, Thomas Hinz (2020).Multi-factorial survey experiments have become a well-established tool in social sciences as they combine experimental designs with advantages of heterogeneous respondent samples. This survey was conducted to investigate methods problems that can be related with different design features of factorial surveys. Three questions can be investigated: how to present vignettes (running text vs. table), how to measure responses (rating vs. open scale), and how to sort vignettes (random vs. extreme-cases-first, to prevent censored responses). Experiments were conducted in a 2 x 2 x 2 between-subject design with 408 university students rating decks à 20 vignettes. Results were published in Carsten Sauer, Katrin Auspurg, Thomas Hinz (2020)
sj-pdf-1-asr-10.1177_00031224211038507 – Supplemental material for Categorical Distinctions and Claims-Making: Opportunity, Agency, and Returns from Wage Negotiations
No full textSupplemental material, sj-pdf-1-asr-10.1177_00031224211038507 for Categorical Distinctions and Claims-Making: Opportunity, Agency, and Returns from Wage Negotiations by Carsten Sauer, Peter Valet, Safi Shams and Donald Tomaskovic-Devey in American Sociological Review</p
Gender Bias in Justice Evaluations of Earnings: Evidence From Three Survey Experiments
No full textSauer C. Gender Bias in Justice Evaluations of Earnings: Evidence From Three Survey Experiments. Frontiers in Sociology. 2020;5: 22
Stata tip 118: Orthogonalizing powered and product terms using residual centering
No full textSauer C. Stata tip 118: Orthogonalizing powered and product terms using residual centering. Stata Journal. 2014;14(1):226-229
Correction to: When terminology hinders research: the colloquialisms of transitions of control in automated driving (Cognition, Technology & Work, (2022), 10.1007/s10111-022-00705-3)
Full text linkIn the original article, author affiliation published with error. The correct affiliations are: Davide Maggi—Institute for Transport Studies, Leeds, UK. Richard Romano—Institute for Transport Studies, Leeds, UK. Oliver Carsten—Institute for Transport Studies, Leeds, UK. Joost C. F. De Winter—Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands. The original article has been corrected.Human-Robot Interactio
- …
